TACU ranks 9th and CCFE 119th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
CCFE vs TACU
TACU −0.96pt a year
0.96%0.00%
TACU 2.1×the volume
2.02K4.15K
CCFE vs TACU Performance
−5.9%+11.2%
- CCFE 0.96%
- TACU 0.00%, better
- CCFE $33M
- TACU $17M
- CCFE −5.8%
- TACU
- CCFE 28
- TACU 411
- CCFE 2.02K sh
- TACU 4.15K sh, better
- CCFE $24.94
- TACU $27.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CCFE | TACU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F18 | A99Higher |
| Mission | C46 | A81Higher |
| Risk | F6 | B69Higher |
| Tradability | F8 | C49Higher |
| Holdings | C40 | A83Higher |
| Durability | D36 | C43Higher |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. CCFE and TACU are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CCFEF
TACUA
In short
CCFE A 20-to-30-stock mid-cap book from a boutique sub-adviser, wrapped in an ETF. Concentrated, bottom-up, and priced like the active management it is at 0.96%.
TACU T. Rowe Price's quant-plus-fundamental take on core large-cap U.S. stock, benchmarked to the Russell 1000. Gross fee 0.14%, fully waived to zero through January 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
CCFE The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed equity portfolio, primarily consisting of mid-capitalization companies. The adviser applies bottom-up fundamental analysis and ranks companies using quality, valuation, and investment-thesis timing criteria.
TACU The fund seeks long-term capital growth through a primarily U.S. equity portfolio. It combines quantitative models with fundamental, bottom-up analysis and seeks excess returns relative to the Russell 1000 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CCFE vs TACU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CCFE vs TACU Cost
Overpaying CCFE vs TACU
$18,034
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CCFE 0.96%
$18,034
TACU 0.00%
$0
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CCFE | TACU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $0 | $1,695 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $0 | $6,383 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $0 | $18,034 |
- 0.96%CCFE
- 0.00%TACU, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
TACU cheapest of 121 funds
CCFE 99th cheapest of 121 funds
CCFE vs TACU Dividends
- CCFE
- TACU None
- CCFE $0.005
- TACU
- CCFE Dec 23, 2025
- TACU
- CCFE Dec 24, 2025
- TACU
- CCFE Irregular
- TACU
Distribution history
CCFE vs TACU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CCFE 24.1%TACU
- Return per unit of risk
- CCFE −0.002TACU
- Worst fall
- CCFE −25.6%TACU
- Market sensitivity
- CCFE 0.99TACU 0.96
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.00% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.00% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.00% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.