Skip to content
etf.net

CCML vs RACK

Roundhill MLCC & Electronic Components ETF

CCML—Nasdaq

VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF

RACKACboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

RACK −0.15pt a year

CCML0.65%RACK0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

RACK 1.02×the volume

CCML37.1KRACK38K

CCML vs RACK Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−20.2%CCML−11.7%RACK

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CCML −20.2%. RACK −11.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%10%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
CCML 0.65%
RACK 0.50%, better
Fund size
CCML $9M
RACK $71M
Holdings
CCML 14
RACK 52
Avg volume (30D)
CCML 37.1K sh
RACK 38K sh, better
NAV per share
CCML $21.50
RACK $43.07
52W range

ETF.net Grade

  • —CCMLNot yet graded
RACK: Cost 82, Risk 43, Mission not scored, Tradability 71, Holdings 79, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for CCML, RACK, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCCMLRACK
Cost30% weightNot scoredA82
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightNot scoredC43
Tradability15% weightNot scoredA71
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA79
Durability5% weightNot scoredB64

Rank among AI Data Infrastructure funds

How we build Categories ›

AI Data Infrastructure⁠

Category · 11 funds
See all 11 ›

RACK ranks 3rd of 11 funds in the AI Data Infrastructure Category.

  1. Rank 1AWTAIWisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation FundScore 78
  2. Rank 2ADTCRGlobal X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETFScore 75
  3. Rank 3ARACKVanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4BTCAITortoise AI Infrastructure ETFScore 55
  5. CCMLNot yet graded

CCML vs RACK Holdings

How CCML and RACK differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CCML and 0.0% of RACK.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile4.0%
  • Sector6 Sectors56.2%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in CCML and RACK, widest gap first
SectorMore in CCMLMore in RACK
TechnologyCCML +43.8 points
IndustrialsRACK +20.2 points
UtilitiesRACK +10.8 points
EnergyRACK +6.7 points
Real EstateRACK +3.6 points
MaterialsRACK +2.5 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CCML and RACK, widest gap first
CountryMore in CCMLMore in RACK
United StatesRACK +88.8 points
JapanCCML +51.5 points
South KoreaCCML +26.1 points
TaiwanCCML +18.4 points
CanadaRACK +6.5 points
United KingdomRACK +0.7 points

Outside the US: CCML 51% developed, 49% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CCML146.9%
  • RACK43.2%

Securities held

  • CCML8
  • RACK51

Asset class

CCML
Equity
RACK
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in CCML8
  • In both0
  • Only in RACK51

Only in CCML

8 securities, 100% of CCML by weight

  • United States Treasury Bill 12/03/202647.42%
  • Murata Manufacturing Co Ltd22.86%
  • Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co Ltd17.68%

Only in RACK

51 securities, 100% of RACK by weight

  • Amphenol Corp4.92%
  • Nvidia Corp4.66%
  • Eaton Corp Plc4.62%

Weight gaps

CCML and RACK share no securities.

All 13 CCML holdings⁠All RACK holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CCML vs RACK Cost

Overpaying CCML vs RACK

$2,738

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CCML 0.65%

    $12,717

  • RACK 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CCML 0.65%
  • RACK 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530CCML $12,717RACK $9,979

Year by year

YearCCMLRACKOverpaying
10$1,163$900$263
20$4,440$3,460$980
30$12,717$9,979$2,738

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%CCML
  • 0.50%RACK, cheaper
  • Middle half of AI Data Infrastructure funds
  • Median 0.65%

RACK 2nd cheapest of 11 funds

CCML 5th cheapest of 11 funds

CCML vs RACK Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
CCML None
RACK None

Distribution history

CCMLAll CCML payments⁠

No distribution history available.

RACKAll RACK payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CCML vs RACK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CCML 0.00RACK 2.45

CCML and RACK in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • CCML—vsWTAIA

    Roundhill MLCC & Electronic Components ETF · WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • RACKAvsWTAIA

    VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF · WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CCML—vsDTCRA

    Roundhill MLCC & Electronic Components ETF · Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • RACKAvsDTCRA

    VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF · Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CCML—vsTCAIB

    Roundhill MLCC & Electronic Components ETF · Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • RACKAvsTCAIB

    VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF · Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.