HYLB ranks 3rd and CDX 74th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
CDX vs HYLB
HYLB −0.45pt a year
0.50%0.05%
HYLB 10.0×the volume
122K1.22M
HYLB +2.0pt
+6.5%+8.5%
CDX vs HYLB Performance
−3.7%+1.9%
- CDX 0.50%
- HYLB 0.05%, better
- CDX $304M
- HYLB $3.3B
- CDX −3.7%
- HYLB +1.9%, better
- CDX 8.22%, better
- HYLB 6.73%
- CDX 115
- HYLB 1280
- CDX 122K sh
- HYLB 1.22M sh, better
- CDX $20.15
- HYLB $35.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CDX | HYLB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A98Higher |
| Mission | D27 | A100Higher |
| Risk | F11 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | F9 | A88Higher |
| Durability | C49 | A77Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. CDX and HYLB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CDXC
HYLBA
In short
CDX Most high yield ETFs buy the bonds. Simplify's CDX rents the exposure through swaps and layers a quality-versus-junk hedge on top. An active, derivatives-first route into junk credit, priced like one.
HYLB Broad-market junk bonds at index-fund pricing: 0.05% a year, a fraction of what the typical high-yield bond ETF charges, spread across roughly 1,300 issues. Running since 2016, it pays monthly.
Stated mandate
CDX Effective September 2, 2025, the fund's stated objective is to maximize total return. Its strategy continues to obtain primarily high-yield bond exposure through swaps and a credit-hedge derivatives approach.
HYLB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. It uses a passive representative-sampling indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CDX vs HYLB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CDX vs HYLB Cost
Overpaying CDX vs HYLB
$8,919
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CDX 0.50%
$9,979
HYLB 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CDX | HYLB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $92 | $808 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $360 | $3,100 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,060 | $8,919 |
- 0.50%CDX
- 0.05%HYLB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
HYLB 2nd cheapest of 84 funds
CDX 55th cheapest of 84 funds
CDX vs HYLB Dividends
- CDX 8.22%, better
- HYLB 6.73%
- CDX $1.66
- HYLB $2.37
- CDX $0.13
- HYLB $0.20
- CDX Oct 27, 2026
- HYLB Oct 1, 2026
- CDX Oct 30, 2026
- HYLB Oct 8, 2026
- CDX Monthly
- HYLB Monthly
Distribution history
CDX vs HYLB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CDX 5.2%HYLB 4.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CDX 0.38HYLB 0.82, better
- Worst fall
- CDX −13.3%HYLB −15.5%
- Market sensitivity
- CDX 0.56HYLB 0.66
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.