SCYB ranks 1st and CDX 74th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
CDX vs SCYB
SCYB −0.47pt a year
0.50%0.03%
SCYB 9.1×the volume
122K1.1M
SCYB +1.9pt
+6.5%+8.4%
CDX vs SCYB Performance
−3.7%+2.0%
- CDX 0.50%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- CDX $304M
- SCYB $2.8B
- CDX −3.7%
- SCYB +2.0%, better
- CDX 8.22%, better
- SCYB 7.14%
- CDX 115
- SCYB 1844
- CDX 122K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- CDX $20.15
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CDX | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A100Higher |
| Mission | D27 | A100Higher |
| Risk | F11 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | F9 | A99Higher |
| Durability | C49 | B68Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. CDX and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CDXC
SCYBA
In short
CDX Most high yield ETFs buy the bonds. Simplify's CDX rents the exposure through swaps and layers a quality-versus-junk hedge on top. An active, derivatives-first route into junk credit, priced like one.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
CDX Effective September 2, 2025, the fund's stated objective is to maximize total return. Its strategy continues to obtain primarily high-yield bond exposure through swaps and a credit-hedge derivatives approach.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CDX vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CDX vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying CDX vs SCYB
$9,341
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CDX 0.50%
$9,979
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CDX | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $55 | $845 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $216 | $3,244 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $638 | $9,341 |
- 0.50%CDX
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
CDX 55th cheapest of 84 funds
CDX vs SCYB Dividends
- CDX 8.22%, better
- SCYB 7.14%
- CDX $1.66
- SCYB $1.80
- CDX $0.13
- SCYB $0.16
- CDX Oct 27, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- CDX Oct 30, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- CDX Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
CDX vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CDX 5.2%SCYB 4.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CDX 0.38SCYB 0.82, better
- Worst fall
- CDX −13.3%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- CDX 0.56SCYB 0.28
CDX and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
