LGLV ranks 1st and CFA 10th of 16 funds in the US Low Volatility Index Category.
CFA vs LGLV
LGLV −0.23pt a year
0.35%0.12%
LGLV 4.6×the volume
5.74K26.6K
LGLV +0.1pt
+11.8%+11.9%
CFA vs LGLV Performance
+44.4%+45.7%
- CFA 0.35%
- LGLV 0.12%, better
- CFA $535M
- LGLV $1.2B
- CFA +13.8%, better
- LGLV +11.7%
- CFA 1.21%
- LGLV 2.06%, better
- CFA 501
- LGLV 174
- CFA 5.74K sh
- LGLV 26.6K sh, better
- CFA $101.04
- LGLV $187.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CFA | LGLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F7 | A90Higher |
| Mission | A92 | A93Higher |
| Risk | C47Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | C40 | A82Higher |
| Holdings | A88Higher | C52 |
| Durability | C54 | A74Higher |
Rank among US Low Volatility Index funds
Same Category. CFA and LGLV are both graded against the same 16 US Low Volatility Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CFAC
LGLVA
In short
CFA CFA puts its low-volatility tilt in the weighting rather than a screen: roughly 500 US large caps, each sized by its own volatility instead of its market value. A 2014-vintage take on the factor.
LGLV Most low-vol funds run an optimizer. LGLV just ranks the biggest 1,000 US stocks by how calm they have been and gives the quietest ones the heaviest weights, for 0.12% a year.
Stated mandate
CFA The fund aims to track the performance of the CEMP US Large Cap 500 Volatility Weighted Index before accounting for fees and expenses.
LGLV The fund is designed to provide exposure to U.S. large-capitalization equities selected through a low-volatility index strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CFA vs LGLV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CFA vs LGLV Cost
Overpaying CFA vs LGLV
$4,606
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CFA 0.35%
$7,126
LGLV 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CFA | LGLV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $220 | $414 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $859 | $1,595 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $2,520 | $4,606 |
- 0.35%CFA
- 0.12%LGLV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Low Volatility Index funds
- Median 0.20%
LGLV 2nd cheapest of 16 funds
CFA 14th cheapest of 16 funds
CFA vs LGLV Dividends
- CFA 1.21%
- LGLV 2.06%, better
- CFA $1.22
- LGLV $3.88
- CFA $0.10
- LGLV $0.99
- CFA Oct 8, 2026
- LGLV Sep 21, 2026
- CFA Oct 9, 2026
- LGLV Sep 23, 2026
- CFA Monthly
- LGLV Quarterly
Distribution history
CFA vs LGLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CFA
- LGLV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CFA 12.0%LGLV 11.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CFA 1.00, betterLGLV 0.86
- Worst fall
- CFA −20.9%LGLV −17.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CFA 0.86LGLV 0.48
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.