QLV ranks 2nd and CFA 10th of 16 funds in the US Low Volatility Index Category.
CFA vs QLV
QLV −0.27pt a year
0.35%0.08%
QLV 1.5×the volume
5.74K8.83K
QLV +2.7pt
+7.6%+10.3%
CFA vs QLV Performance
+44.4%+63.3%
- CFA 0.35%
- QLV 0.08%, better
- CFA $535M
- QLV $189M
- CFA +13.8%
- QLV +17.0%, better
- CFA 1.21%
- QLV 1.43%, better
- CFA 501
- QLV 122
- CFA 5.74K sh
- QLV 8.83K sh, better
- CFA $101.04
- QLV $82.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CFA | QLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F7 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A92Higher | A76 |
| Risk | C47 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | C40 | B67Higher |
| Holdings | A88Higher | D34 |
| Durability | C54Higher | D31 |
Rank among US Low Volatility Index funds
Same Category. CFA and QLV are both graded against the same 16 US Low Volatility Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CFAC
QLVA
In short
CFA CFA puts its low-volatility tilt in the weighting rather than a screen: roughly 500 US large caps, each sized by its own volatility instead of its market value. A 2014-vintage take on the factor.
QLV Low vol with a quality gate: the index cuts the weakest-scoring fifth of US large and mid caps, then optimizes what's left for calm. Fee is 0.08% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
CFA The fund aims to track the performance of the CEMP US Large Cap 500 Volatility Weighted Index before accounting for fees and expenses.
QLV The fund seeks to track the Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index and provide exposure to U.S. companies selected for lower overall volatility and quality characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CFA vs QLV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CFA vs QLV Cost
Overpaying CFA vs QLV
$5,437
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CFA 0.35%
$7,126
QLV 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CFA | QLV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $147 | $487 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $575 | $1,879 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $1,689 | $5,437 |
- 0.35%CFA
- 0.08%QLV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Low Volatility Index funds
- Median 0.20%
QLV cheapest of 16 funds
CFA 14th cheapest of 16 funds
CFA vs QLV Dividends
- CFA 1.21%
- QLV 1.43%, better
- CFA $1.22
- QLV $1.18
- CFA $0.10
- QLV $0.28
- CFA Oct 8, 2026
- QLV Sep 18, 2026
- CFA Oct 9, 2026
- QLV Sep 24, 2026
- CFA Monthly
- QLV Quarterly
Distribution history
CFA vs QLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CFA
- QLV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CFA 12.0%QLV 8.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CFA 1.00QLV 1.56, better
- Worst fall
- CFA −20.9%QLV −17.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CFA 0.86QLV 0.58
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.