Skip to content

CGDV vs ZINC

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF

CGDVANYSE Arca

Zacks Income ETF

ZINCCNYSE Arca

Overlap

8.5%by weight

Expense ratio

CGDV −0.22pt a year

CGDV0.33%ZINC0.55%

Avg volume · 30D

CGDV 458.0×the volume

CGDV3.37MZINC7.37K

CGDV vs ZINC Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

−5.1%CGDV+0.9%ZINC

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. CGDV −5.1%. ZINC +0.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−4%−2%2%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CGDV 0.33%, better
ZINC 0.55%
Fund size
CGDV $37.8B
ZINC $10M
1Y total return
CGDV +15.4%
ZINC No data
Yield (12M)
CGDV 1.24%
ZINC No data
Holdings
CGDV 57
ZINC 58
Avg volume (30D)
CGDV 3.37M sh, better
ZINC 7.37K sh
NAV per share
CGDV $47.40
ZINC $25.83
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CGDV: Cost 96, Risk 43, Mission 88, Tradability 81, Holdings 50, Durability 95. ZINC: Cost 38, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 40, Holdings 61, Durability 22.
Pillar letters and Scores for CGDV, ZINC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCGDVZINC
Cost30% weightA96HigherD38
Mission25% weightA88Not scored
Risk15% weightC43C45Higher
Tradability15% weightA81HigherC40
Holdings10% weightC50B61Higher
Durability5% weightA95HigherF22

Rank among US Active Dividend Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CGDV and ZINC are both graded against the same 40 US Active Dividend Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Dividend Income⁠

Category · 40 funds
See all 40 ›

CGDV ranks 1st and ZINC 26th of 40 funds in the US Active Dividend Income Category.

  1. Rank 1ACGDVCapital Group Dividend Value ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2AHIDVAB US High Dividend ETFScore 74
  3. Rank 26CSPCTLiberty One Spectrum ETFScore 41
  4. Rank 26CZINCZacks Income ETFScore 41
  5. Rank 28CDVVYInvesco Diversified Dividend Opportunities ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CGDVACapital Group Dividend Value ETF

ZINCCZacks Income ETF

In short

CGDV A stock picker's dividend fund at near-index pricing: 0.33% a year, roughly 60 names, and a mandate for above-average yield plus growth. Live since 2022 and already grown into a multi-billion-dollar fund.

ZINC An active dividend fund built around a payout policy: the prospectus sets a target distribution of roughly 8% annualized on NAV, funded by dividends and, when needed, return of capital. Fee is 0.55% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027.

Stated mandate

CGDV The fund seeks income above the average yield of U.S. stocks while also offering capital-growth potential.

ZINC The Fund is an actively managed ETF whose stated principal strategy applies hybrid research.

Why people hold it

  • CGDV Costs 0.33% a year while the typical fund in its active dividend peer group charges around 0.55%. Active stock picking, index-fund pricing.
  • Dual mandate: income above the average yield of U.S. stocks plus capital-growth potential. Not a pure yield chase.capitalgroup.com
  • Tens of billions in assets and heavy daily trading make it one of the easier funds in its peer group to get in and out of at a fair spread.
  • Delivers its stated mandate with unusual consistency for an active fund, placing it among the strongest implementations in its dividend-income peer group.
  • ZINC Income is the design, not a by-product: managed distributions aim at a target rate of about 8% annualized on per-share NAV at declaration, rather than whatever the portfolio happens to yield.sec.gov
  • Plain stocks, no options overlay. At least 80% of assets go to securities that paid a dividend or interest in the prior year, picked bottom-up, usually large caps of $10 billion or more.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • At 0.55% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027, the fee sits near the category norm for active dividend funds, though peers like VUS at 0.25% and CGDV at 0.33% charge less.

Worth knowing

  • CGDV About 60 holdings. That concentration means individual company stumbles land harder than in a fund holding hundreds of names.
  • Active and benchmark-agnostic: results track the managers' calls, not an index, so it can drift well away from the broad market in either direction.
  • Pays quarterly, not monthly. Worth knowing if you're building an income schedule.
  • ZINC That payout can include your own money back: the prospectus says distributions may be partly return of capital, so a check is not proof of profit. The target can also be raised or lowered without notice.sec.gov
  • Concentration is deliberate: the fund intends to put more than 25% of net assets in financial services, so bank and insurer stress lands harder here than in a broad dividend fund.sec.gov
  • Young and small. It launched in 2026, is thinly traded with a modest asset base, and the gross fee of 1.07% is what applies if the waiver ends June 30, 2027 without renewal.

Full CGDV profile⁠

Full ZINC profile⁠

CGDV vs ZINC Holdings

How CGDV and ZINC differ

Overlap by weight

8.5%

Shared holdings make up 15.3% of ZINC and 12.4% of CGDV.

Level by level

  • Holdings8 in both8.5%
  • Sector11 Sectors40.9%
  • Countryby domicile92.8%
  • Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in CGDV and ZINC, widest gap first
SectorMore in CGDVMore in ZINCGap
TechnologyCGDV +33.3 points
UtilitiesZINC +21.0 points
FinancialsZINC +20.5 points
IndustrialsCGDV +12.9 points
Consumer StaplesZINC +10.3 points
EnergyZINC +7.1 points
CommunicationCGDV +6.5 points
Health CareCGDV +3.0 points
Consumer DiscretionaryCGDV +2.1 points
Real EstateCGDV +0.9 points
MaterialsCGDV +0.5 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CGDV and ZINC, widest gap first
CountryMore in CGDVMore in ZINCGap
United StatesZINC +7.2 points
United KingdomCGDV +2.8 points
TaiwanCGDV +2.0 points
CanadaCGDV +1.9 points
IrelandCGDV +0.5 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CGDV39.8%
  • ZINC34.1%

Securities held

  • CGDV52
  • ZINC58

Asset class

CGDV
Stocks
ZINC
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in CGDV44
  • In both8
  • Only in ZINC50

Only in CGDV

44 securities, 84.4% of CGDV by weight

  • Microsoft Corp Common Stock USD.000006256.92%
  • NVIDIA Corp Common Stock USD.0015.91%
  • Meta Platforms Inc Class A Common Stock USD.0000064.06%

Only in ZINC

50 securities, 85.0% of ZINC by weight

  • Northwestern Ene3.67%
  • Chevron Corp3.46%
  • Pinnacle West3.15%

Weight gaps

All 8 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in CGDV and ZINC, widest gap first
HoldingMore in CGDVMore in ZINCGap
Altria Group Inc Common Stock USD.333MOZINC +4.33 points
Comcast Corp Class A Common Stock USD.01CMCSACGDV +2.65 points
JPMorgan Chase & Co Common Stock USD1.0JPMZINC +1.97 points
International Paper Co Common Stock USD1.0IPCGDV +0.83 points
Exxonmobil Holdings Corp Common StockXOMZINC +0.46 points
Philip Morris International Common StockPMCGDV +0.26 points
Seagate Technology Holdings Common Stock USD.00001STXCGDV +0.18 points
Nextera Energy Inc Common Stock USD.01NEEZINC +0.07 points

All 58 CGDV holdings⁠All ZINC holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CGDV vs ZINC Cost

Overpaying ZINC vs CGDV

$4,167

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CGDV 0.33%

    $6,737

  • ZINC 0.55%

    $10,904

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CGDV 0.33%
  • ZINC 0.55%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530ZINC $10,904CGDV $6,737

Year by year

YearCGDVZINCOverpaying
10$598$988$390
20$2,318$3,790$1,472
30$6,737$10,904$4,167

Expense ratio

  • 0.33%CGDV, cheaper
  • 0.55%ZINC
  • Middle half of US Active Dividend Income funds
  • Median 0.50%

CGDV 2nd cheapest of 40 funds

ZINC 24th cheapest of 40 funds

CGDV vs ZINC Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
CGDV 1.24%
ZINC No data
Payout (12M)
CGDV $0.60
ZINC No data
Last payment
CGDV $0.15
ZINC $0.16
Ex-dividend
CGDV Sep 30, 2026
ZINC Sep 30, 2026
Paid on
CGDV Oct 1, 2026
ZINC Oct 6, 2026
Frequency
CGDV Quarterly
ZINC Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

CGDVQuarterly · 19 paymentsAll CGDV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Mar 30, 2022 $0.03; Jun 29, 2022 $0.05; Sep 29, 2022 $0.10; Dec 23, 2022 $0.14; Mar 30, 2023 $0.09; Jun 29, 2023 $0.12; Sep 28, 2023 $0.12; Dec 27, 2023 $0.17; Mar 28, 2024 $0.10; Jun 28, 2024 $0.13; Sep 30, 2024 $0.15; Dec 26, 2024 $0.18; Mar 31, 2025 $0.11; Jun 30, 2025 $0.13; Sep 30, 2025 $0.14; Dec 26, 2025 $0.19; Mar 31, 2026 $0.11; Jun 30, 2026 $0.15; Sep 30, 2026 $0.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD
ZINCIrregular · 1 paymentAll ZINC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Sep 30, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD

CGDV vs ZINC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CGDV 11.9%ZINC No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CGDV 1.59ZINC No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CGDV −21.8%since Feb 2022ZINC No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CGDV 0.89ZINC 1.00

CGDV and ZINC in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CGDVAvsHIDVA

    Capital Group Dividend Value ETF · AB US High Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.33% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZINCCvsHIDVA

    Zacks Income ETF · AB US High Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CGDVAvsBGIGA

    Capital Group Dividend Value ETF · Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.33% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZINCCvsBGIGA

    Zacks Income ETF · Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CGDVAvsBGDVB

    Capital Group Dividend Value ETF · Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.33% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZINCCvsBGDVB

    Zacks Income ETF · Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.