Skip to content

BGIG vs ZINC

Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF

BGIGANYSE Arca

Zacks Income ETF

ZINCCNYSE Arca

Overlap

13.3%by weight

Expense ratio

BGIG −0.10pt a year

BGIG0.45%ZINC0.55%

Avg volume · 30D

BGIG 25.0×the volume

BGIG184KZINC7.37K

BGIG vs ZINC Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

−0.6%BGIG+0.9%ZINC

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. BGIG −0.6%. ZINC +0.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−4%−2%2%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BGIG 0.45%, better
ZINC 0.55%
Fund size
BGIG $2.23B
ZINC $10M
1Y total return
BGIG +18.1%
ZINC No data
Yield (12M)
BGIG 1.68%
ZINC No data
Holdings
BGIG 50
ZINC 58
Avg volume (30D)
BGIG 184K sh, better
ZINC 7.37K sh
NAV per share
BGIG $36.15
ZINC $25.83
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BGIG: Cost 73, Risk 65, Mission 40, Tradability 81, Holdings 55, Durability 83. ZINC: Cost 38, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 40, Holdings 61, Durability 22.
Pillar letters and Scores for BGIG, ZINC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBGIGZINC
Cost30% weightA73HigherD38
Mission25% weightC40Not scored
Risk15% weightB65HigherC45
Tradability15% weightA81HigherC40
Holdings10% weightB55B61Higher
Durability5% weightA83HigherF22

Rank among US Active Dividend Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BGIG and ZINC are both graded against the same 40 US Active Dividend Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Dividend Income⁠

Category · 40 funds
See all 40 ›

BGIG ranks 3rd and ZINC 26th of 40 funds in the US Active Dividend Income Category.

  1. Rank 1ACGDVCapital Group Dividend Value ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2AHIDVAB US High Dividend ETFScore 74
  3. Rank 3ABGIGBahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETFScore 71
  4. Rank 4BBGDVBahl & Gaynor Dividend ETFScore 67
  5. Rank 26CSPCTLiberty One Spectrum ETFScore 41
  6. Rank 26CZINCZacks Income ETFScore 41
  7. Rank 28CDVVYInvesco Diversified Dividend Opportunities ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BGIGABahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF

ZINCCZacks Income ETF

In short

BGIG An active dividend fund that writes the cushion into its own mandate: rising income, downside protection versus the broad market, and growth. Distributions land monthly, and it charges less than the typical active dividend-income fund.

ZINC An active dividend fund built around a payout policy: the prospectus sets a target distribution of roughly 8% annualized on NAV, funded by dividends and, when needed, return of capital. Fee is 0.55% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027.

Stated mandate

BGIG The Fund seeks growing dividend income, downside protection relative to the broader equity market, and long-term capital appreciation.

ZINC The Fund is an actively managed ETF whose stated principal strategy applies hybrid research.

Why people hold it

  • BGIG The stated objective names three jobs at once: growing dividend income, downside protection relative to the broader equity market, and long-term capital appreciation.
  • Income arrives monthly, not on the quarterly schedule most equity funds keep.
  • At 0.45% a year, it sits below the median fee for active US dividend-income funds.
  • One of the strongest implementations in its peer group of active US dividend-income funds, with a portfolio that matches the mandate on the label.
  • ZINC Income is the design, not a by-product: managed distributions aim at a target rate of about 8% annualized on per-share NAV at declaration, rather than whatever the portfolio happens to yield.sec.gov
  • Plain stocks, no options overlay. At least 80% of assets go to securities that paid a dividend or interest in the prior year, picked bottom-up, usually large caps of $10 billion or more.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • At 0.55% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027, the fee sits near the category norm for active dividend funds, though peers like VUS at 0.25% and CGDV at 0.33% charge less.

Worth knowing

  • BGIG Cheaper active dividend options exist: CGDV runs 0.33% and HIDV 0.35%.
  • Hunting rising dividends means skipping most of the non-payers inside the S&P 500 it measures itself against, so results can look very different from the index.
  • Launched in 2023, so there is no live record spanning a full market cycle yet.
  • ZINC That payout can include your own money back: the prospectus says distributions may be partly return of capital, so a check is not proof of profit. The target can also be raised or lowered without notice.sec.gov
  • Concentration is deliberate: the fund intends to put more than 25% of net assets in financial services, so bank and insurer stress lands harder here than in a broad dividend fund.sec.gov
  • Young and small. It launched in 2026, is thinly traded with a modest asset base, and the gross fee of 1.07% is what applies if the waiver ends June 30, 2027 without renewal.

Full BGIG profile⁠

Full ZINC profile⁠

BGIG vs ZINC Holdings

How BGIG and ZINC differ

Overlap by weight

13.3%

Shared holdings make up 15.6% of BGIG and 15.2% of ZINC.

Level by level

  • Holdings8 in both13.3%
  • Sector11 Sectors53.8%
  • Countryby domicile89.4%
  • Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in BGIG and ZINC, widest gap first
SectorMore in BGIGMore in ZINCGap
TechnologyBGIG +22.0 points
UtilitiesZINC +15.9 points
Health CareBGIG +11.7 points
Consumer StaplesZINC +11.5 points
FinancialsZINC +10.9 points
IndustrialsBGIG +9.5 points
Real EstateBGIG +3.2 points
MaterialsZINC +2.6 points
Consumer DiscretionaryZINC +2.4 points
CommunicationZINC +1.9 points
EnergyZINC +1.0 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BGIG and ZINC, widest gap first
CountryMore in BGIGMore in ZINCGap
United StatesZINC +10.6 points
TaiwanBGIG +4.1 points
ChinaBGIG +2.2 points
SwitzerlandBGIG +1.9 points
United KingdomBGIG +1.3 points
FinlandBGIG +0.7 points
IrelandBGIG +0.4 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BGIG40.3%
  • ZINC34.1%

Securities held

  • BGIG50
  • ZINC58

Asset class

BGIG
Stocks
ZINC
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in BGIG42
  • In both8
  • Only in ZINC50

Only in BGIG

42 securities, 84.4% of BGIG by weight

  • Microsoft Corp5.29%
  • AbbVie Inc4.61%
  • UnitedHealth Group Inc4.53%

Only in ZINC

50 securities, 85.1% of ZINC by weight

  • Altria Group Inc5.15%
  • Northwestern Ene3.67%
  • Pinnacle West3.15%

Weight gaps

All 8 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in BGIG and ZINC, widest gap first
HoldingMore in BGIGMore in ZINCGap
JPMorgan Chase & Co.JPMZINC +1.20 points
ONEOK IncOKEZINC +0.61 points
NextEra Energy IncNEEBGIG +0.52 points
Philip Morris International IncPMBGIG +0.47 points
Chevron CorpCVXBGIG +0.44 points
Smurfit Westrock PLCSWBGIG +0.42 points
PPL CorpPPLBGIG +0.41 points
ExxonMobil Holdings CorpXOMZINC +0.06 points

All 50 BGIG holdings⁠All ZINC holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BGIG vs ZINC Cost

Overpaying ZINC vs BGIG

$1,863

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BGIG 0.45%

    $9,041

  • ZINC 0.55%

    $10,904

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BGIG 0.45%
  • ZINC 0.55%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530ZINC $10,904BGIG $9,041

Year by year

YearBGIGZINCOverpaying
10$812$988$176
20$3,128$3,790$662
30$9,041$10,904$1,863

Expense ratio

  • 0.45%BGIG, cheaper
  • 0.55%ZINC
  • Middle half of US Active Dividend Income funds
  • Median 0.50%

BGIG 9th cheapest of 40 funds

ZINC 24th cheapest of 40 funds

BGIG vs ZINC Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
BGIG 1.68%
ZINC No data
Payout (12M)
BGIG $0.62
ZINC No data
Last payment
BGIG $0.05
ZINC $0.16
Ex-dividend
BGIG Oct 29, 2026
ZINC Sep 30, 2026
Paid on
BGIG Nov 2, 2026
ZINC Oct 6, 2026
Frequency
BGIG Monthly
ZINC Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

BGIGMonthly · 38 paymentsAll BGIG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 38 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Sep 27, 2023 $0.01; Oct 27, 2023 $0.05; Nov 28, 2023 $0.05; Dec 28, 2023 $0.09; Jan 29, 2024 $0.05; Feb 27, 2024 $0.05; Mar 26, 2024 $0.05; Apr 26, 2024 $0.05; May 30, 2024 $0.05; Jun 27, 2024 $0.05; Jul 30, 2024 $0.05; Aug 29, 2024 $0.05; Sep 27, 2024 $0.05; Oct 30, 2024 $0.05; Nov 27, 2024 $0.05; Dec 31, 2024 $0.06; Jan 30, 2025 $0.05; Feb 27, 2025 $0.05; Mar 28, 2025 $0.05; Apr 29, 2025 $0.05; May 29, 2025 $0.05; Jun 27, 2025 $0.05; Jul 30, 2025 $0.05; Aug 28, 2025 $0.05; Sep 29, 2025 $0.05; Oct 30, 2025 $0.05; Nov 26, 2025 $0.05; Dec 31, 2025 $0.05; Jan 29, 2026 $0.05; Feb 26, 2026 $0.05; Mar 26, 2026 $0.05; Apr 29, 2026 $0.05; May 28, 2026 $0.05; Jun 29, 2026 $0.05; Jul 30, 2026 $0.05; Aug 28, 2026 $0.05; Sep 29, 2026 $0.05; Oct 29, 2026 $0.05. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.1020232026YTD
ZINCIrregular · 1 paymentAll ZINC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Sep 30, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.1020232026YTD

BGIG vs ZINC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BGIG 9.5%ZINC No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BGIG 1.49ZINC No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BGIG −13.2%since Sep 2023ZINC No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BGIG 0.51ZINC 1.00

BGIG and ZINC in the news

Popular comparisons

  • BGIGAvsCGDVA

    Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF · Capital Group Dividend Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZINCCvsCGDVA

    Zacks Income ETF · Capital Group Dividend Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BGIGAvsHIDVA

    Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF · AB US High Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZINCCvsHIDVA

    Zacks Income ETF · AB US High Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BGIGAvsBGDVB

    Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF · Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZINCCvsBGDVB

    Zacks Income ETF · Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.