HIDV ranks 2nd and ZINC 26th of 40 funds in the US Active Dividend Income Category.
HIDV vs ZINC
HIDV −0.20pt a year
0.35%0.55%
ZINC 1.00×the volume
7.35K7.37K
HIDV vs ZINC Performance
−2.4%+0.9%
- HIDV 0.35%, better
- ZINC 0.55%
- HIDV $200M
- ZINC $10M
- HIDV +17.5%
- ZINC
- HIDV 2.53%
- ZINC
- HIDV 110
- ZINC 58
- HIDV 7.35K sh
- ZINC 7.37K sh, better
- HIDV $87.92
- ZINC $25.83
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HIDV | ZINC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91Higher | D38 |
| Mission | A81 | |
| Risk | D34 | C45Higher |
| Tradability | A84Higher | C40 |
| Holdings | B66Higher | B61 |
| Durability | A79Higher | F22 |
Rank among US Active Dividend Income funds
Same Category. HIDV and ZINC are both graded against the same 40 US Active Dividend Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HIDVA
ZINCC
In short
HIDV HIDV hunts dividends without wandering off the map: an active, systematic screen on value, quality and momentum, wrapped around S&P 500-like market participation. Income tilt, core-equity shape.
ZINC An active dividend fund built around a payout policy: the prospectus sets a target distribution of roughly 8% annualized on NAV, funded by dividends and, when needed, return of capital. Fee is 0.55% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
HIDV HIDV is an active U.S. equity ETF seeking core U.S. equity exposure, attractive dividend income, and capital appreciation. Its systematic process is designed to identify dividend opportunities while maintaining diversified, market-like participation.
ZINC The Fund is an actively managed ETF whose stated principal strategy applies hybrid research.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HIDV vs ZINC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HIDV vs ZINC Cost
Overpaying ZINC vs HIDV
$3,778
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HIDV 0.35%
$7,126
ZINC 0.55%
$10,904
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HIDV | ZINC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $988 | $354 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $3,790 | $1,336 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $10,904 | $3,778 |
- 0.35%HIDV, cheaper
- 0.55%ZINC
- Middle half of US Active Dividend Income funds
- Median 0.50%
HIDV 4th cheapest of 40 funds
ZINC 24th cheapest of 40 funds
HIDV vs ZINC Dividends
- HIDV 2.53%
- ZINC
- HIDV $2.28
- ZINC
- HIDV $0.67
- ZINC $0.16
- HIDV Sep 18, 2026
- ZINC Sep 30, 2026
- HIDV Sep 21, 2026
- ZINC Oct 6, 2026
- HIDV Quarterly
- ZINC Irregular
Distribution history
HIDV vs ZINC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HIDV 12.1%ZINC
- Return per unit of risk
- HIDV 1.43ZINC
- Worst fall
- HIDV −18.8%ZINC
- Market sensitivity
- HIDV 0.97ZINC 1.00
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.