SCYB ranks 1st and CGHY 34th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
CGHY vs SCYB
SCYB −0.36pt a year
0.39%0.03%
SCYB 22.6×the volume
50.5K1.14M
CGHY vs SCYB Performance
+3.0%+2.6%
- CGHY 0.39%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- CGHY $168M
- SCYB $2.73B
- CGHY +3.0%, better
- SCYB +2.6%
- CGHY 5.38%
- SCYB 7.16%, better
- CGHY 378
- SCYB 1838
- CGHY 50.5K sh
- SCYB 1.14M sh, better
- CGHY $24.59
- SCYB $25.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGHY | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B58 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A90 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B61Higher | B60 |
| Tradability | C52 | A79Higher |
| Holdings | C45 | A99Higher |
| Durability | C52 | B68Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. CGHY and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGHYB
SCYBA
In short
CGHY Capital Group's swing at high yield: an actively managed junk-bond fund with no index to follow, priced at 0.39% in a corner of the market where index rivals charge pennies.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
CGHY The fund seeks a high level of current income, with capital appreciation as a secondary objective.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGHY vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGHY vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying CGHY vs SCYB
$7,260
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGHY 0.39%
$7,898
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGHY | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $55 | $650 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $216 | $2,509 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $638 | $7,260 |
- 0.39%CGHY
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
CGHY 31st cheapest of 84 funds
CGHY vs SCYB Dividends
- CGHY 5.38%
- SCYB 7.16%, better
- CGHY $1.33
- SCYB $1.81
- CGHY $0.11
- SCYB $0.16
- CGHY Oct 30, 2026
- SCYB Nov 2, 2026
- CGHY Nov 2, 2026
- SCYB Nov 6, 2026
- CGHY Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
CGHY vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGHY 3.4%SCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- CGHY −0.09SCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- CGHY −2.9%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- CGHY 0.14SCYB 0.28
CGHY and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
