FPAG ranks 4th and CGV 12th of 15 funds in the Global Active Value Category.
CGV vs FPAG
FPAG −1.08pt a year
1.57%0.49%
FPAG 2.5×the volume
16.6K41.5K
CGV vs FPAG Performance
+13.2%+17.1%
- CGV 1.57%
- FPAG 0.49%, better
- CGV $134M
- FPAG $662M
- CGV +13.2%
- FPAG +17.1%, better
- CGV 5.22%, better
- FPAG 1.29%
- CGV 99
- FPAG 72
- CGV 16.6K sh
- FPAG 41.5K sh, better
- CGV $15.53
- FPAG $41.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGV | FPAG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F7 | A82Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D35 | C44Higher |
| Tradability | C46Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | B67Higher | B63 |
| Durability | B58 | A73Higher |
Rank among Global Active Value funds
Same Category. CGV and FPAG are both graded against the same 15 Global Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGVD
FPAGB
In short
CGV A 2013-vintage global value strategy that moved into an ETF wrapper in 2022. Cheapness alone does not earn a slot here: fundamental, quantitative and technical screens all weigh in, and the book stays compact at roughly 50 names.
FPAG FPA's contrarian value desk in ETF form: about 40 out-of-favor global large and mid caps, no sector constraints, 0.49% net of a waiver through January 31, 2027.
Stated mandate
CGV The actively managed fund seeks long-term risk-adjusted total return. It normally invests at least 80% of assets in equity securities or economically equity-linked investments, selecting securities through technical, fundamental, and quantitative analysis focused on value-oriented criteria.
FPAG The Fund seeks long-term growth of principal and income. It normally invests at least 95% of assets in equities, primarily publicly traded common stocks of mid- and large-cap U.S. and non-U.S. companies, including emerging-market companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGV vs FPAG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGV vs FPAG Cost
Overpaying CGV vs FPAG
$17,474
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGV 1.57%
$27,266
FPAG 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGV | FPAG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,703 | $883 | $1,820 |
| 20 | $9,904 | $3,394 | $6,510 |
| 30 | $27,266 | $9,792 | $17,474 |
- 1.57%CGV
- 0.49%FPAG, cheaper
- Middle half of Global Active Value funds
- Median 0.68%
FPAG 3rd cheapest of 15 funds
CGV 14th cheapest of 15 funds
CGV vs FPAG Dividends
- CGV 5.22%, better
- FPAG 1.29%
- CGV $0.81
- FPAG $0.54
- CGV $0.08
- FPAG $0.09
- CGV Sep 29, 2026
- FPAG Sep 15, 2026
- CGV Oct 2, 2026
- FPAG Sep 22, 2026
- CGV Quarterly
- FPAG Quarterly
Distribution history
CGV vs FPAG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGV 13.6%FPAG 12.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- CGV 0.63FPAG 1.01
- Worst fall
- CGV −16.6%FPAG −18.1%
- Market sensitivity
- CGV 0.83FPAG 0.97
Popular comparisons
- 1.57% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.57% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.57% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.