SFGV ranks 3rd and CGV 12th of 15 funds in the Global Active Value Category.
CGV vs SFGV
SFGV −1.24pt a year
1.57%0.33%
CGV 1.2×the volume
16.6K14.3K
CGV vs SFGV Performance
+13.2%+18.5%
- CGV 1.57%
- SFGV 0.33%, better
- CGV $134M
- SFGV $1.18B
- CGV +13.2%
- SFGV +18.5%, better
- CGV 5.22%, better
- SFGV 2.23%
- CGV 99
- SFGV 517
- CGV 16.6K sh, better
- SFGV 14.3K sh
- CGV $15.53
- SFGV $36.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGV | SFGV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F7 | A93Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D35 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | C46 | C53Higher |
| Holdings | B67Higher | C43 |
| Durability | B58 | A75Higher |
Rank among Global Active Value funds
Same Category. CGV and SFGV are both graded against the same 15 Global Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGVD
SFGVA
In short
CGV A 2013-vintage global value strategy that moved into an ETF wrapper in 2022. Cheapness alone does not earn a slot here: fundamental, quantitative and technical screens all weigh in, and the book stays compact at roughly 50 names.
SFGV A wealth manager's global value model in ETF clothing: SFGV hunts profitable companies with cheap cash flows and a habit of paying shareholders back, at 0.33% net of a waiver through March 31, 2027, below most global value rivals.
Stated mandate
CGV The actively managed fund seeks long-term risk-adjusted total return. It normally invests at least 80% of assets in equity securities or economically equity-linked investments, selecting securities through technical, fundamental, and quantitative analysis focused on value-oriented criteria.
SFGV The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGV vs SFGV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGV vs SFGV Cost
Overpaying CGV vs SFGV
$20,529
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGV 1.57%
$27,266
SFGV 0.33%
$6,737
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGV | SFGV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,703 | $598 | $2,105 |
| 20 | $9,904 | $2,318 | $7,586 |
| 30 | $27,266 | $6,737 | $20,529 |
- 1.57%CGV
- 0.33%SFGV, cheaper
- Middle half of Global Active Value funds
- Median 0.68%
SFGV 2nd cheapest of 15 funds
CGV 14th cheapest of 15 funds
CGV vs SFGV Dividends
- CGV 5.22%, better
- SFGV 2.23%
- CGV $0.81
- SFGV $0.80
- CGV $0.08
- SFGV $0.14
- CGV Sep 29, 2026
- SFGV Sep 28, 2026
- CGV Oct 2, 2026
- SFGV Sep 30, 2026
- CGV Quarterly
- SFGV Quarterly
Distribution history
CGV vs SFGV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGV 13.6%SFGV 10.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- CGV 0.63SFGV 1.02
- Worst fall
- CGV −16.6%SFGV −14.5%
- Market sensitivity
- CGV 0.83SFGV 0.59
Popular comparisons
- 1.57% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.57% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.57% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.