QTUM ranks 1st and CHAT 21st of 30 funds in the Artificial Intelligence Category.
CHAT vs QTUM
QTUM −0.35pt a year
0.75%0.40%
CHAT 1.2×the volume
424K362K
QTUM +1.1pt
+44.2%+45.3%
CHAT vs QTUM Performance
+15.6%+17.5%
- CHAT 0.75%
- QTUM 0.40%, better
- CHAT $1.6B
- QTUM $5.06B
- CHAT +15.6%
- QTUM +17.5%, better
- CHAT
- QTUM 1.05%
- CHAT 38
- QTUM 89
- CHAT 424K sh, better
- QTUM 362K sh
- CHAT $75.84
- QTUM $134.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CHAT | QTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F21 | A86Higher |
| Mission | A74 | |
| Risk | D35 | A70Higher |
| Tradability | B59 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | B59 | A91Higher |
| Durability | A80Higher | A79 |
Rank among Artificial Intelligence funds
Same Category. CHAT and QTUM are both graded against the same 30 Artificial Intelligence funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CHATC
QTUMA
In short
CHAT A concentrated, actively managed take on generative AI: roughly 50 global names chosen by a manager rather than a rules-based index. Roundhill launched it in 2023, when 'generative AI' was still a novelty in fund names.
QTUM Live since 2018, QTUM turns the quantum-computing story into a plain index fund: about 90 global names spanning quantum hardware and machine learning, for 0.40% a year.
Stated mandate
CHAT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio of global exchange-listed equity companies involved in artificial intelligence, particularly generative AI and related technologies.
QTUM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the BlueStar® Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index. It uses a passive indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CHAT vs QTUM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CHAT vs QTUM Cost
Overpaying CHAT vs QTUM
$6,392
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CHAT 0.75%
$14,482
QTUM 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CHAT | QTUM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $723 | $613 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $2,793 | $2,285 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $8,090 | $6,392 |
- 0.75%CHAT
- 0.40%QTUM, cheaper
- Middle half of Artificial Intelligence funds
- Median 0.65%
QTUM 5th cheapest of 30 funds
CHAT 22nd cheapest of 30 funds
CHAT vs QTUM Dividends
- CHAT
- QTUM 1.05%
- CHAT
- QTUM $1.40
- CHAT $1.68
- QTUM $0.46
- CHAT Dec 29, 2025
- QTUM Sep 23, 2026
- CHAT Dec 30, 2025
- QTUM Sep 24, 2026
- CHAT Irregular
- QTUM Quarterly
Distribution history
CHAT vs QTUM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CHAT 34.1%QTUM 28.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CHAT 1.12QTUM 1.30, better
- Worst fall
- CHAT −31.3%QTUM −38.4%
- Market sensitivity
- CHAT 1.89QTUM 1.67
CHAT and QTUM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




