OKTG ranks 3rd and CIFG 71st of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
CIFG vs OKTG
7.4%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.75%0.75%
CIFG 34.8×the volume
1.34M38.5K
CIFG vs OKTG Performance
−93.5%+170.5%
- CIFG 0.75%
- OKTG 0.75%
- CIFG $7M
- OKTG $8M
- CIFG 5
- OKTG 6
- CIFG 1.34M sh, better
- OKTG 38.5K sh
- CIFG $0.6600
- OKTG $53.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CIFG | OKTG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A70 |
| Mission | A98Higher | A94 |
| Risk | F21 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | B58 | A73Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C50 | C51Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. CIFG and OKTG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CIFGC
OKTGA
In short
CIFG Two-times daily exposure to Cipher Digital, the bitcoin miner building industrial-scale data centers. Same geared math as the rest of the aisle, at 0.75% a year, under the typical leveraged single-stock fee.
OKTG A 2x daily amplifier on Okta, the identity-security stock, in an ETF wrapper. Leverage Shares prices it at 0.75%, under the typical leveraged single-stock fund, in a corner of the market built mostly around mega-caps.
Stated mandate
CIFG The fund seeks daily returns equal to 200% of the daily performance of Cipher Digital stock, before fees and expenses.
OKTG The fund seeks daily leveraged investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of the publicly traded common stock identified as OKTA, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CIFG vs OKTG Holdings
How CIFG and OKTG differ
7.4%
Shared holdings make up 12.2% of CIFG and 7.4% of OKTG.
Level by level
- Holdings7.4%
Sector
No Sector split for CIFG and OKTG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CIFGMore in OKTG | CIFG | OKTG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- CIFG212.4%
- OKTG207.4%
- CIFG1
- OKTG1
Asset class
- CIFG
- Equity
- OKTG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in CIFG0
- In both1
- Only in OKTG0
Only in CIFG
0 securities, 0.0% of CIFG by weight
Only in OKTG
0 securities, 0.0% of OKTG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in CIFGMore in OKTG | CIFG | OKTG |
|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | CIFG +4.85 points | 12.20% | 7.35% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CIFG vs OKTG Cost
Same expense ratio
$14,482
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CIFG 0.75%
$14,482
OKTG 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CIFG | OKTG |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,336 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $5,078 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $14,482 |
- 0.75%CIFG
- 0.75%OKTG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
CIFG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
OKTG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
CIFG vs OKTG Dividends
- CIFG None
- OKTG None
Distribution history
CIFG vs OKTG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- CIFG 7.76OKTG 2.39
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.