PANG ranks 3rd and CIFG 71st of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
CIFG vs PANG
CIFG −0.01pt a year
0.75%0.76%
CIFG 30.0×the volume
1.34M44.6K
CIFG vs PANG Performance
−93.5%+160.8%
- CIFG 0.75%, better
- PANG 0.76%
- CIFG $7M
- PANG $9M
- CIFG
- PANG +76.3%
- CIFG 5
- PANG 4
- CIFG 1.34M sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- CIFG $0.6600
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CIFG | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A70 |
| Mission | A98Higher | A94 |
| Risk | F21 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | B58 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C50 | B59Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. CIFG and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CIFGC
PANGA
In short
CIFG Two-times daily exposure to Cipher Digital, the bitcoin miner building industrial-scale data centers. Same geared math as the rest of the aisle, at 0.75% a year, under the typical leveraged single-stock fee.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
CIFG The fund seeks daily returns equal to 200% of the daily performance of Cipher Digital stock, before fees and expenses.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CIFG vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CIFG vs PANG Cost
Overpaying PANG vs CIFG
$174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CIFG 0.75%
$14,482
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CIFG | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,353 | $17 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $5,142 | $64 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $14,656 | $174 |
- 0.75%CIFG, cheaper
- 0.76%PANG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
CIFG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
CIFG vs PANG Dividends
- CIFG None
- PANG
- CIFG
- PANG $1.30
- CIFG
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- CIFG
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- CIFG
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
CIFG vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CIFG PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- CIFG PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- CIFG PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- CIFG 7.76PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.