UNHG ranks 2nd and CIFG 71st of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
CIFG vs UNHG
12.2%by weight
CIFG −0.02pt a year
0.75%0.77%
CIFG 1.8×the volume
1.34M726K
CIFG vs UNHG Performance
−93.5%+18.4%
- CIFG 0.75%, better
- UNHG 0.77%
- CIFG $7M
- UNHG $63M
- CIFG
- UNHG +8.4%
- CIFG 5
- UNHG 5
- CIFG 1.34M sh, better
- UNHG 726K sh
- CIFG $0.6600
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CIFG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | B60 |
| Mission | A98Higher | A90 |
| Risk | F21 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | B58 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C50 | B66Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. CIFG and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CIFGC
UNHGA
In short
CIFG Two-times daily exposure to Cipher Digital, the bitcoin miner building industrial-scale data centers. Same geared math as the rest of the aisle, at 0.75% a year, under the typical leveraged single-stock fee.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
CIFG The fund seeks daily returns equal to 200% of the daily performance of Cipher Digital stock, before fees and expenses.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CIFG vs UNHG Holdings
How CIFG and UNHG differ
12.2%
Shared holdings make up 13.5% of UNHG and 12.2% of CIFG.
Level by level
- Holdings12.2%
Sector
No Sector split for CIFG and UNHG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CIFGMore in UNHG | CIFG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- CIFG212.4%
- UNHG213.5%
- CIFG1
- UNHG1
Asset class
- CIFG
- Equity
- UNHG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in CIFG0
- In both1
- Only in UNHG0
Only in CIFG
0 securities, 0.0% of CIFG by weight
Only in UNHG
0 securities, 0.0% of UNHG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in CIFGMore in UNHG | CIFG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | UNHG +1.27 points | 12.20% | 13.47% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CIFG vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying UNHG vs CIFG
$347
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CIFG 0.75%
$14,482
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CIFG | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,371 | $35 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $5,205 | $127 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $14,829 | $347 |
- 0.75%CIFG, cheaper
- 0.77%UNHG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
CIFG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
CIFG vs UNHG Dividends
- CIFG None
- UNHG
- CIFG
- UNHG $1.90
- CIFG
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- CIFG
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- CIFG
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
CIFG vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CIFG UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- CIFG UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- CIFG UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- CIFG 7.76UNHG 5.19
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.