FLSP ranks 1st and CLSE 11th of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
CLSE vs FLSP
FLSP −0.87pt a year
1.52%0.65%
CLSE 2.4×the volume
391K161K
CLSE +17.0pt
+27.7%+10.7%
CLSE vs FLSP Performance
+23.5%+11.5%
- CLSE 1.52%
- FLSP 0.65%, better
- CLSE $1B
- FLSP $1.1B
- CLSE +23.5%, better
- FLSP +11.5%
- CLSE 0.79%
- FLSP 2.45%, better
- CLSE 165
- FLSP 295
- CLSE 391K sh, better
- FLSP 161K sh
- CLSE $32.78
- FLSP $28.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CLSE | FLSP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31 | A93Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B63 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | A95Higher | C53 |
| Holdings | A84 | |
| Durability | A82 | A85Higher |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. CLSE and FLSP are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CLSEB
FLSPA
In short
CLSE A hedge-fund playbook in an ETF wrapper: Convergence buys the US mid- and large-caps it expects to outperform and shorts the ones it expects to lag, running a strategy that dates back to 2009.
FLSP A hedge-fund style trade in an ETF wrapper. FLSP goes long and short across value, momentum and carry rather than just owning cheap stocks, which makes it the odd one out in a cohort of long-only factor funds.
Stated mandate
CLSE The Fund seeks long-term capital growth through an actively managed portfolio of long and short positions in domestic companies’ equity securities. It generally favors medium- and large-capitalization companies, buying securities expected to outperform and shorting those expected to underperform.
FLSP The fund uses a top-down risk-premia strategy focused on value, momentum, and carry factors, taking both long and short positions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CLSE vs FLSP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CLSE vs FLSP Cost
Overpaying CLSE vs FLSP
$13,849
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CLSE 1.52%
$26,566
FLSP 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CLSE | FLSP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,622 | $1,163 | $1,459 |
| 20 | $9,630 | $4,440 | $5,190 |
| 30 | $26,566 | $12,717 | $13,849 |
- 1.52%CLSE
- 0.65%FLSP, cheaper
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
FLSP 3rd cheapest of 29 funds
CLSE 21st cheapest of 29 funds
CLSE vs FLSP Dividends
- CLSE 0.79%
- FLSP 2.45%, better
- CLSE $0.26
- FLSP $0.71
- CLSE $0.26
- FLSP $0.71
- CLSE Dec 15, 2025
- FLSP Dec 19, 2025
- CLSE Dec 16, 2025
- FLSP Dec 29, 2025
- CLSE Annual
- FLSP Annual
Distribution history
CLSE vs FLSP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CLSE 11.9%FLSP 6.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CLSE 1.76, betterFLSP 0.87
- Worst fall
- CLSE −16.4%FLSP −9.5%
- Market sensitivity
- CLSE 0.75FLSP 0.01
CLSE and FLSP in the news
Category Review
The largest alternatives fund has no one-year record

Popular comparisons
- 1.52% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.52% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.52% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.