QAI ranks 2nd and CLSE 11th of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
CLSE vs QAI
QAI −0.71pt a year
1.52%0.81%
CLSE 7.0×the volume
391K56.1K
CLSE +18.8pt
+27.7%+8.9%
CLSE vs QAI Performance
+23.5%+6.4%
- CLSE 1.52%
- QAI 0.81%, better
- CLSE $1B
- QAI $999M
- CLSE +23.5%, better
- QAI +6.4%
- CLSE 0.79%
- QAI 1.42%, better
- CLSE 165
- QAI 55
- CLSE 391K sh, better
- QAI 56.1K sh
- CLSE $32.78
- QAI $35.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CLSE | QAI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31 | A86Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B63 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | A95Higher | A81 |
| Holdings | C50 | |
| Durability | A82 | A84Higher |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. CLSE and QAI are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CLSEB
QAIA
In short
CLSE A hedge-fund playbook in an ETF wrapper: Convergence buys the US mid- and large-caps it expects to outperform and shorts the ones it expects to lag, running a strategy that dates back to 2009.
QAI The original hedge fund replication ETF, listed in 2009: a fund of roughly 50 exchange-traded products tracking an index built to mimic hedge fund styles, for 0.81% net of a fee waiver (1.03% gross).
Stated mandate
CLSE The Fund seeks long-term capital growth through an actively managed portfolio of long and short positions in domestic companies’ equity securities. It generally favors medium- and large-capitalization companies, buying securities expected to outperform and shorting those expected to underperform.
QAI The Fund seeks to track the performance of the IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Index before fees and expenses. It uses passive indexing and invests primarily in exchange-traded products and related financial instruments representing the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CLSE vs QAI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CLSE vs QAI Cost
Overpaying CLSE vs QAI
$11,048
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CLSE 1.52%
$26,566
QAI 0.81%
$15,518
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CLSE | QAI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,622 | $1,439 | $1,183 |
| 20 | $9,630 | $5,456 | $4,174 |
| 30 | $26,566 | $15,518 | $11,048 |
- 1.52%CLSE
- 0.81%QAI, cheaper
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
QAI 5th cheapest of 29 funds
CLSE 21st cheapest of 29 funds
CLSE vs QAI Dividends
- CLSE 0.79%
- QAI 1.42%, better
- CLSE $0.26
- QAI $0.50
- CLSE $0.26
- QAI $0.50
- CLSE Dec 15, 2025
- QAI Dec 30, 2025
- CLSE Dec 16, 2025
- QAI Jan 5, 2026
- CLSE Annual
- QAI Annual
Distribution history
CLSE vs QAI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CLSE 11.9%QAI 5.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CLSE 1.76, betterQAI 0.81
- Worst fall
- CLSE −16.4%QAI −14.1%
- Market sensitivity
- CLSE 0.75QAI 0.35
CLSE and QAI in the news
Category Review
The largest alternatives fund has no one-year record

Popular comparisons
- 1.52% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.52% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.52% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.