HBDC ranks 2nd and CLSE 11th of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
CLSE vs HBDC
HBDC −1.13pt a year
1.52%0.39%
CLSE 49.8×the volume
391K7.84K
CLSE vs HBDC Performance
+23.5%+2.0%
- CLSE 1.52%
- HBDC 0.39%, better
- CLSE $1B
- HBDC $90M
- CLSE +23.5%, better
- HBDC +2.0%
- CLSE 0.79%
- HBDC 5.15%, better
- CLSE 165
- HBDC 156
- CLSE 391K sh, better
- HBDC 7.84K sh
- CLSE $32.78
- HBDC $24.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CLSE | HBDC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B63 | B63 |
| Tradability | A95Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | A86 | |
| Durability | A82Higher | C49 |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. CLSE and HBDC are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CLSEB
HBDCA
In short
CLSE A hedge-fund playbook in an ETF wrapper: Convergence buys the US mid- and large-caps it expects to outperform and shorts the ones it expects to lag, running a strategy that dates back to 2009.
HBDC Private credit's lenders have to borrow too. HBDC owns the senior unsecured bonds that business development companies issue, a first-mover take on BDC debt instead of BDC stock, wrapped in a rules-based index.
Stated mandate
CLSE The Fund seeks long-term capital growth through an actively managed portfolio of long and short positions in domestic companies’ equity securities. It generally favors medium- and large-capitalization companies, buying securities expected to outperform and shorting those expected to underperform.
HBDC The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive Hilton Capital BDC Corporate Bond TR Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CLSE vs HBDC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CLSE vs HBDC Cost
Overpaying CLSE vs HBDC
$18,668
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CLSE 1.52%
$26,566
HBDC 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CLSE | HBDC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,622 | $705 | $1,917 |
| 20 | $9,630 | $2,725 | $6,905 |
| 30 | $26,566 | $7,898 | $18,668 |
- 1.52%CLSE
- 0.39%HBDC, cheaper
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
HBDC cheapest of 29 funds
CLSE 21st cheapest of 29 funds
CLSE vs HBDC Dividends
- CLSE 0.79%
- HBDC 5.15%, better
- CLSE $0.26
- HBDC $1.25
- CLSE $0.26
- HBDC $0.11
- CLSE Dec 15, 2025
- HBDC Oct 29, 2026
- CLSE Dec 16, 2025
- HBDC Oct 30, 2026
- CLSE Annual
- HBDC Monthly
Distribution history
CLSE vs HBDC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CLSE 11.9%HBDC 2.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- CLSE 1.76HBDC −0.28
- Worst fall
- CLSE −16.4%HBDC −3.0%
- Market sensitivity
- CLSE 0.75HBDC 0.13
CLSE and HBDC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.52% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.52% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.52% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

