Skip to content

CLSM vs ENDW

ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF

CLSMCNasdaq

Cambria Endowment Style ETF

ENDWANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

ENDW −0.60pt a year

CLSM0.82%ENDW0.22%

Avg volume · 30D

ENDW 2.0×the volume

CLSM8.75KENDW17.1K

CLSM vs ENDW Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+15.4%CLSM+14.9%ENDW

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CLSM +15.4%. ENDW +14.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CLSM 0.82%
ENDW 0.22%, better
Fund size
CLSM $98M
ENDW $160M
1Y total return
CLSM +15.4%, better
ENDW +14.9%
Yield (12M)
CLSM 0.77%
ENDW 2.37%, better
Holdings
CLSM 5
ENDW 73
Avg volume (30D)
CLSM 8.75K sh
ENDW 17.1K sh, better
NAV per share
CLSM $27.68
ENDW $34.35
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CLSM: Cost 66, Risk 40, Mission not scored, Tradability 51, Holdings 31, Durability 60. ENDW: Cost 100, Risk 75, Mission 81, Tradability 69, Holdings 62, Durability 65.
Pillar letters and Scores for CLSM, ENDW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCLSMENDW
Cost30% weightB66A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA81
Risk15% weightC40A75Higher
Tradability15% weightC51B69Higher
Holdings10% weightD31B62Higher
Durability5% weightB60B65Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CLSM and ENDW are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

ENDW ranks 1st and CLSM 26th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 25CKAMOKensington Credit Opportunities ETFScore 53
  4. Rank 26CCLSMETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETFScore 52
  5. Rank 26CFPAAFPA Global Allocation ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CLSMCETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF

ENDWACambria Endowment Style ETF

In short

CLSM A tactical allocation fund whose name states the plan: tilt toward leading sectors, dialed to a moderate risk setting. The mandate is plain long-term growth, and its 0.82% fee sits under the typical charge in the tactical crowd.

ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.

Stated mandate

CLSM The Fund seeks to provide long-term growth.

ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.

Why people hold it

  • CLSM 0.82% a year, below the median expense ratio for its tactical allocation peer group.
  • One stated job in the prospectus: long-term growth. No index to shadow, so the sector mix can move as the model reads conditions.
  • Trading since 2021, so there is a live multi-year record behind the strategy rather than a backtest.
  • ENDW 0.22% a year against a roughly 0.95% median for tactical allocation funds, and cheaper than the other standouts in the group such as ONOF (0.39%) and GMOD (0.50%).
  • One ticker spans US, developed and emerging markets across equities, bonds and real assets, roughly 70 positions, with value and momentum screens applied on top.cambriafunds.com
  • Capital efficient by design: the manager expects notional exposure of 100% to 150% of assets, using Treasury futures alongside the underlying ETF sleeves.usnews.combusinesswire.com
  • Pays income quarterly, and on our review it sits among the strongest implementations in the tactical allocation group.

Worth knowing

  • CLSM Thinly traded, so spreads can run wider and larger orders are harder to fill than in heavily traded funds.
  • Cheap for its cohort, not cheap outright. Other tactical funds in the same group charge less, including ENDW at 0.22% and ONOF at 0.39%.
  • Discretionary with no declared index: the stated goal is simply long-term growth, so there is no benchmark contract to measure the sector calls against.
  • ENDW It owns other ETFs, which charge their own fees on top of the 0.22% management fee, so the all-in cost of ownership runs higher than the headline.cambriafunds.com
  • Leverage works both ways. Notional exposure above 100% of assets magnifies moves in either direction, and Cambria itself calls the risk profile aggressive.businesswire.com
  • Launched in 2025 and still modest in size, so the record is short and shares change hands less often than mainstream index funds.

Full CLSM profile⁠

Full ENDW profile⁠

CLSM vs ENDW Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CLSM vs ENDW Cost

Overpaying CLSM vs ENDW

$11,131

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CLSM 0.82%

    $15,689

  • ENDW 0.22%

    $4,558

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CLSM 0.82%
  • ENDW 0.22%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530CLSM $15,689ENDW $4,558

Year by year

YearCLSMENDWOverpaying
10$1,457$401$1,056
20$5,519$1,561$3,958
30$15,689$4,558$11,131

Expense ratio

  • 0.82%CLSM
  • 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

ENDW cheapest of 46 funds

CLSM 16th cheapest of 46 funds

CLSM vs ENDW Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CLSM 0.77%
ENDW 2.37%, better
Payout (12M)
CLSM $0.21
ENDW $0.82
Last payment
CLSM $0.21
ENDW $0.16
Ex-dividend
CLSM Dec 30, 2025
ENDW Sep 28, 2026
Paid on
CLSM Dec 31, 2025
ENDW Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
CLSM Annual
ENDW Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

CLSMAnnual · 3 paymentsAll CLSM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.16; Dec 30, 2024 $0.43; Dec 30, 2025 $0.21. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
ENDWQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll ENDW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2025 $0.06; Sep 29, 2025 $0.18; Dec 30, 2025 $0.35; Mar 30, 2026 $0.16; Jun 29, 2026 $0.15; Sep 28, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

CLSM vs ENDW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CLSM 11.5%ENDW 9.2%since May 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CLSM 0.66ENDW 1.99since May 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CLSM −31.7%ENDW −6.4%since Apr 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CLSM 0.87ENDW 0.61

Popular comparisons

  • CLSMCvsGMODA

    ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.82% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsGMODA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CLSMCvsPTBDA

    ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.82% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsPTBDA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CLSMCvsRISNA

    ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.82% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsRISNA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.