PTBD ranks 3rd and CLSM 26th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
CLSM vs PTBD
PTBD −0.22pt a year
0.82%0.60%
PTBD 2.1×the volume
8.75K18.6K
CLSM +2.7pt
+1.1%−1.6%
CLSM vs PTBD Performance
+5.7%−7.9%
- CLSM 0.82%
- PTBD 0.60%, better
- CLSM $98M
- PTBD $83M
- CLSM +15.4%, better
- PTBD −0.1%
- CLSM 0.77%
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- CLSM 5
- PTBD 1047
- CLSM 8.75K sh
- PTBD 18.6K sh, better
- CLSM $27.68
- PTBD $18.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CLSM | PTBD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B66 | A83Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C40 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | C51Higher | C50 |
| Holdings | D31 | A90Higher |
| Durability | B60 | A83Higher |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. CLSM and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CLSMC
PTBDA
In short
CLSM A tactical allocation fund whose name states the plan: tilt toward leading sectors, dialed to a moderate risk setting. The mandate is plain long-term growth, and its 0.82% fee sits under the typical charge in the tactical crowd.
PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.
Stated mandate
CLSM The Fund seeks to provide long-term growth.
PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CLSM vs PTBD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CLSM vs PTBD Cost
Overpaying CLSM vs PTBD
$3,872
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CLSM 0.82%
$15,689
PTBD 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CLSM | PTBD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,457 | $1,076 | $381 |
| 20 | $5,519 | $4,116 | $1,403 |
| 30 | $15,689 | $11,817 | $3,872 |
- 0.82%CLSM
- 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds
CLSM 16th cheapest of 46 funds
CLSM vs PTBD Dividends
- CLSM 0.77%
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- CLSM $0.21
- PTBD $1.17
- CLSM $0.21
- PTBD $0.10
- CLSM Dec 30, 2025
- PTBD Oct 22, 2026
- CLSM Dec 31, 2025
- PTBD Oct 26, 2026
- CLSM Annual
- PTBD Monthly
Distribution history
CLSM vs PTBD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CLSM
- PTBD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CLSM 11.5%PTBD 5.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CLSM 0.66, betterPTBD 0.08
- Worst fall
- CLSM −31.7%PTBD −24.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CLSM 0.87PTBD 0.74
Popular comparisons
- 0.82% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.82% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.82% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.