Skip to content

CLSM vs PTBD

ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF

CLSMCNasdaq

Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

PTBDANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

PTBD −0.22pt a year

CLSM0.82%PTBD0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

PTBD 2.1×the volume

CLSM8.75KPTBD18.6K

5Y return · a year

CLSM +2.7pt

CLSM+1.1%PTBD−1.6%

CLSM vs PTBD Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.7%CLSM−7.9%PTBD

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. CLSM +5.7%. PTBD −7.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%10%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CLSM 0.82%
PTBD 0.60%, better
Fund size
CLSM $98M
PTBD $83M
1Y total return
CLSM +15.4%, better
PTBD −0.1%
Yield (12M)
CLSM 0.77%
PTBD 6.36%, better
Holdings
CLSM 5
PTBD 1047
Avg volume (30D)
CLSM 8.75K sh
PTBD 18.6K sh, better
NAV per share
CLSM $27.68
PTBD $18.34
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CLSM: Cost 66, Risk 40, Mission not scored, Tradability 51, Holdings 31, Durability 60. PTBD: Cost 83, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 90, Durability 83.
Pillar letters and Scores for CLSM, PTBD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCLSMPTBD
Cost30% weightB66A83Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC40B60Higher
Tradability15% weightC51HigherC50
Holdings10% weightD31A90Higher
Durability5% weightB60A83Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CLSM and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

PTBD ranks 3rd and CLSM 26th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 25CKAMOKensington Credit Opportunities ETFScore 53
  6. Rank 26CCLSMETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETFScore 52
  7. Rank 26CFPAAFPA Global Allocation ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CLSMCETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF

PTBDAPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

In short

CLSM A tactical allocation fund whose name states the plan: tilt toward leading sectors, dialed to a moderate risk setting. The mandate is plain long-term growth, and its 0.82% fee sits under the typical charge in the tactical crowd.

PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.

Stated mandate

CLSM The Fund seeks to provide long-term growth.

PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.

Why people hold it

  • CLSM 0.82% a year, below the median expense ratio for its tactical allocation peer group.
  • One stated job in the prospectus: long-term growth. No index to shadow, so the sector mix can move as the model reads conditions.
  • Trading since 2021, so there is a live multi-year record behind the strategy rather than a backtest.
  • PTBD The rulebook is public and mechanical: high yield measured against Treasuries, compared to its 100-day average, with five straight closes needed to confirm. No manager hunch involved.paceretfs.com
  • 0.60% a year, comfortably below the median for tactical multi-asset funds. Cheap for a strategy that does the reallocating for you.
  • Holds roughly 1,000 bonds in whichever sleeve the signal points to, so no single issuer carries much weight. Income is distributed monthly.
  • Trading since 2019, long enough to have run the rules through a rate shock and a credit wobble, and it sits in the upper tier of the tactical funds we cover.

Worth knowing

  • CLSM Thinly traded, so spreads can run wider and larger orders are harder to fill than in heavily traded funds.
  • Cheap for its cohort, not cheap outright. Other tactical funds in the same group charge less, including ENDW at 0.22% and ONOF at 0.39%.
  • Discretionary with no declared index: the stated goal is simply long-term growth, so there is no benchmark contract to measure the sector calls against.
  • PTBD Trend rules react, they don't anticipate. A sharp reversal can flip the signal after the move has happened, and the confirmation window means the switch lands days later.paceretfs.com
  • In its risk-on position the portfolio is high yield corporate debt, full stop. That is credit risk, a different animal from Treasury rate risk.paceretfs.com
  • Not one of the heavily traded names in its category, so the spread and a limit order matter more here than with a mega-fund.

Full CLSM profile⁠

Full PTBD profile⁠

CLSM vs PTBD Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CLSM vs PTBD Cost

Overpaying CLSM vs PTBD

$3,872

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CLSM 0.82%

    $15,689

  • PTBD 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CLSM 0.82%
  • PTBD 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530CLSM $15,689PTBD $11,817

Year by year

YearCLSMPTBDOverpaying
10$1,457$1,076$381
20$5,519$4,116$1,403
30$15,689$11,817$3,872

Expense ratio

  • 0.82%CLSM
  • 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds

CLSM 16th cheapest of 46 funds

CLSM vs PTBD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CLSM 0.77%
PTBD 6.36%, better
Payout (12M)
CLSM $0.21
PTBD $1.17
Last payment
CLSM $0.21
PTBD $0.10
Ex-dividend
CLSM Dec 30, 2025
PTBD Oct 22, 2026
Paid on
CLSM Dec 31, 2025
PTBD Oct 26, 2026
Frequency
CLSM Annual
PTBD Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CLSMAnnual · 2 paymentsAll CLSM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2024 $0.43; Dec 30, 2025 $0.21. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
PTBDMonthly · 46 paymentsAll PTBD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 46 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jan 26, 2023 $0.09; Feb 23, 2023 $0.11; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Apr 27, 2023 $0.07; May 25, 2023 $0.04; Jun 22, 2023 $0.09; Jul 27, 2023 $0.16; Aug 24, 2023 $0.12; Sep 21, 2023 $0.12; Oct 26, 2023 $0.14; Nov 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 27, 2023 $0.17; Jan 25, 2024 $0.09; Feb 22, 2024 $0.11; Mar 21, 2024 $0.12; Apr 25, 2024 $0.14; May 23, 2024 $0.09; Jun 27, 2024 $0.18; Jul 25, 2024 $0.11; Aug 22, 2024 $0.09; Sep 26, 2024 $0.06; Oct 24, 2024 $0.08; Nov 21, 2024 $0.10; Dec 27, 2024 $0.15; Jan 23, 2025 $0.07; Feb 26, 2025 $0.12; Mar 27, 2025 $0.10; Apr 24, 2025 $0.03; May 22, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.12; Jul 24, 2025 $0.10; Aug 27, 2025 $0.12; Sep 25, 2025 $0.09; Oct 23, 2025 $0.09; Nov 25, 2025 $0.06; Dec 23, 2025 $0.15; Jan 22, 2026 $0.06; Feb 25, 2026 $0.11; Mar 26, 2026 $0.07; Apr 23, 2026 $0.09; May 21, 2026 $0.07; Jun 25, 2026 $0.12; Jul 23, 2026 $0.10; Aug 27, 2026 $0.15; Sep 24, 2026 $0.09; Oct 22, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

CLSM vs PTBD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • CLSM
  • PTBD
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: CLSM −31.7% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CLSM 11.5%PTBD 5.2%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CLSM 0.66, betterPTBD 0.08
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CLSM −31.7%PTBD −24.8%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CLSM 0.87PTBD 0.74

Popular comparisons

  • CLSMCvsENDWA

    ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.82% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsENDWA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CLSMCvsGMODA

    ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.82% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsGMODA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CLSMCvsRISNA

    ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.82% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsRISNA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.