CMDT ranks 4th and KCCA 11th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.
CMDT vs KCCA
CMDT −0.30pt a year
0.65%0.95%
CMDT 2.7×the volume
65.9K24.1K
CMDT +22.2pt
+14.2%−8.0%
CMDT vs KCCA Performance
+28.0%−0.6%
- CMDT 0.65%, better
- KCCA 0.95%
- CMDT $890M
- KCCA $121M
- CMDT +28.0%, better
- KCCA −0.6%
- CMDT 12.09%, better
- KCCA 2.85%
- CMDT 357
- KCCA 3
- CMDT 65.9K sh, better
- KCCA 24.1K sh
- CMDT $31.84
- KCCA $17.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CMDT | KCCA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B61Higher | F16 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A81Higher | D32 |
| Tradability | C51Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | A70Higher | D39 |
| Durability | A72Higher | B55 |
Rank among Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. CMDT and KCCA are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CMDTB
KCCAD
In short
CMDT PIMCO took the standard commodity futures fund and added the thing it is known for: an actively managed bond portfolio sitting behind the commodity bets. The mandate is to beat the Bloomberg Commodity Index, not mirror it.
KCCA Most commodity funds ride weather and geology. KCCA tracks futures on California carbon allowances, a market where supply is set by state regulators and the auction floor price ratchets up 5% plus inflation every year.
Stated mandate
CMDT The fund aims to achieve a total return that outperforms the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, while maintaining prudent investment management.
KCCA KCCA provides targeted exposure to California Carbon Allowances through the cap-and-invest market and is benchmarked to an index tracking actively traded CCA futures.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CMDT vs KCCA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CMDT vs KCCA Cost
Overpaying KCCA vs CMDT
$5,152
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CMDT 0.65%
$12,717
KCCA 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CMDT | KCCA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,678 | $515 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $6,322 | $1,882 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $17,869 | $5,152 |
- 0.65%CMDT, cheaper
- 0.95%KCCA
- Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.79%
CMDT 6th cheapest of 13 funds
KCCA 11th cheapest of 13 funds
CMDT vs KCCA Dividends
- CMDT 12.09%, better
- KCCA 2.85%
- CMDT $3.83
- KCCA $0.48
- CMDT $3.20
- KCCA $0.48
- CMDT Oct 1, 2026
- KCCA Dec 22, 2025
- CMDT Oct 5, 2026
- KCCA Dec 23, 2025
- CMDT Quarterly
- KCCA Annual
Distribution history
CMDT vs KCCA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CMDT 11.5%, betterKCCA 19.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- CMDT 0.83, betterKCCA −0.56
- Worst fall
- CMDT −13.2%KCCA −41.1%
- Market sensitivity
- CMDT 0.78KCCA −0.14
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.62%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.62%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.