COMB ranks 3rd and FTGC 12th of 22 funds in the Broad Commodity Futures Category.
COMB vs FTGC
COMB −0.73pt a year
0.25%0.98%
FTGC 13.4×the volume
38.9K523K
FTGC +3.0pt
+9.2%+12.2%
COMB vs FTGC Performance
+55.1%+77.8%
- COMB 0.25%, better
- FTGC 0.98%
- COMB $152M
- FTGC $3.24B
- COMB +28.9%
- FTGC +29.5%, better
- COMB 7.22%
- FTGC 15.09%, better
- COMB 40
- FTGC 35
- COMB 38.9K sh
- FTGC 523K sh, better
- COMB $26.65
- FTGC $29.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COMB | FTGC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | F7 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C52 | A71Higher |
| Tradability | B55 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | B67 | |
| Durability | D31 | A87Higher |
Rank among Broad Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. COMB and FTGC are both graded against the same 22 Broad Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COMBB
FTGCC
In short
COMB The cheapest ticket in the K-1-free commodity aisle: 0.25% for a broad basket of energy, metals, grain and livestock futures, wrapped so your tax packet is a Form 1099 instead of a Schedule K-1.
FTGC The broad-commodity fund that picks its own weights. Running since 2013, it sizes futures by volatility instead of copying a production-weighted index, and holds them through a Cayman subsidiary so tax time brings a 1099, not a K-1.
Stated mandate
COMB The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation mainly through exposure to commodity futures markets.
FTGC The Fund seeks total returns through commodity exposure while aiming for a relatively stable risk profile.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COMB vs FTGC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COMB vs FTGC Cost
Overpaying FTGC vs COMB
$13,203
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COMB 0.25%
$5,159
FTGC 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COMB | FTGC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $1,729 | $1,274 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $6,504 | $4,735 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $18,362 | $13,203 |
- 0.25%COMB, cheaper
- 0.98%FTGC
- Middle half of Broad Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.67%
COMB 2nd cheapest of 22 funds
FTGC 20th cheapest of 22 funds
COMB vs FTGC Dividends
- COMB 7.22%
- FTGC 15.09%, better
- COMB $1.91
- FTGC $4.37
- COMB $1.91
- FTGC $0.13
- COMB Dec 29, 2025
- FTGC Sep 24, 2026
- COMB Dec 31, 2025
- FTGC Sep 30, 2026
- COMB Annual
- FTGC Quarterly
Distribution history
COMB vs FTGC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- COMB
- FTGC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COMB 14.2%FTGC 13.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- COMB 0.73FTGC 0.90, better
- Worst fall
- COMB −26.5%FTGC −22.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- COMB 1.00FTGC 0.92
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.