Skip to content

COMB vs FTGC

GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF

COMBBNYSE Arca

First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund

FTGCCNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

COMB −0.73pt a year

COMB0.25%FTGC0.98%

Avg volume · 30D

FTGC 13.4×the volume

COMB38.9KFTGC523K

5Y return · a year

FTGC +3.0pt

COMB+9.2%FTGC+12.2%

COMB vs FTGC Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+55.1%COMB+77.8%FTGC

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. COMB +55.1%. FTGC +77.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%40%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
COMB 0.25%, better
FTGC 0.98%
Fund size
COMB $152M
FTGC $3.24B
1Y total return
COMB +28.9%
FTGC +29.5%, better
Yield (12M)
COMB 7.22%
FTGC 15.09%, better
Holdings
COMB 40
FTGC 35
Avg volume (30D)
COMB 38.9K sh
FTGC 523K sh, better
NAV per share
COMB $26.65
FTGC $29.07
52W range

ETF.net Grade

COMB: Cost 93, Risk 52, Mission not scored, Tradability 55, Holdings not scored, Durability 31. FTGC: Cost 7, Risk 71, Mission not scored, Tradability 84, Holdings 67, Durability 87.
Pillar letters and Scores for COMB, FTGC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCOMBFTGC
Cost30% weightA93HigherF7
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC52A71Higher
Tradability15% weightB55A84Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB67
Durability5% weightD31A87Higher

Rank among Broad Commodity Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. COMB and FTGC are both graded against the same 22 Broad Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Broad Commodity Futures⁠

Category · 22 funds
See all 22 ›

COMB ranks 3rd and FTGC 12th of 22 funds in the Broad Commodity Futures Category.

  1. Rank 1ACERYState Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 2ABCIabrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETFScore 73
  3. Rank 3BCMDYiShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETFScore 69
  4. Rank 3BCOMBGraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 69
  5. Rank 5BSDMFSimplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETFScore 67
  6. Rank 11CHGERHarbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER)Score 51
  7. Rank 12CFTGCFirst Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy FundScore 48
  8. Rank 12CNBCMNeuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETFScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

COMBBGraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF

FTGCCFirst Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund

In short

COMB The cheapest ticket in the K-1-free commodity aisle: 0.25% for a broad basket of energy, metals, grain and livestock futures, wrapped so your tax packet is a Form 1099 instead of a Schedule K-1.

FTGC The broad-commodity fund that picks its own weights. Running since 2013, it sizes futures by volatility instead of copying a production-weighted index, and holds them through a Cayman subsidiary so tax time brings a 1099, not a K-1.

Stated mandate

COMB The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation mainly through exposure to commodity futures markets.

FTGC The Fund seeks total returns through commodity exposure while aiming for a relatively stable risk profile.

Why people hold it

  • COMB At 0.25%, the lowest fee among the category's top-scoring broad commodity funds (BCI 0.26%, CERY 0.28%, CMDY 0.29%, BCD 0.30%) and below the category median.
  • Gains its futures exposure through a wholly owned Cayman subsidiary, so the fund is designed to be taxed like a conventional fund and issue a 1099, not a K-1.sec.gov
  • Benchmarked to the Bloomberg Commodity Index: about 30 positions across energy, metals, agriculture and livestock, with index rules capping any commodity group at 33%.bbhub.io
  • Live since 2017, long enough to have run through a full commodity boom and bust, and it sits in the top quartile of its peer group.
  • FTGC Genuinely active: weightings across roughly 40 commodity positions are rebalanced in an attempt to stabilize risk levels, not fixed by the production-and-liquidity math behind traditional index baskets.sec.gov
  • Futures exposure sits inside a wholly-owned Cayman subsidiary so the fund can stay within 1940 Act tax limits, which means ordinary fund reporting on a 1099 rather than a partnership K-1.sec.gov
  • One of the longer-tenured actively managed commodity ETFs, live since 2013, now a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively.
  • Distributions come quarterly, and the fund measures itself against the Bloomberg Commodity Index, so the manager's calls can be judged against the standard broad basket.

Worth knowing

  • COMB Thinly traded next to the category's household names, so spreads can widen. Matters most on bigger orders.
  • Returns ride the futures curve, not spot prices. Rolling contracts forward can add to or subtract from the move in a commodity's headline price.graniteshares.com
  • Actively managed rather than a strict index clone, with Treasury bills as collateral and cash paid out annually or semiannually, not monthly.graniteshares.com
  • FTGC Active judgment carries an active price: 0.98% a year against a 0.72% median for broad commodity futures funds, with index-tracking rivals like BCI (0.26%) and CMDY (0.29%) far cheaper.
  • Risk-based weighting means the sector mix can sit well away from a production-weighted benchmark, so results can diverge from the standard commodity index in either direction.sec.gov
  • The prospectus is blunt that commodity-linked derivatives may be considered speculative and can fluctuate widely on macro and commodity-specific shocks. A stable risk profile is the aim, not a promise.sec.gov

Full COMB profile⁠

Full FTGC profile⁠

COMB vs FTGC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

COMB vs FTGC Cost

Overpaying FTGC vs COMB

$13,203

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • COMB 0.25%

    $5,159

  • FTGC 0.98%

    $18,362

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • COMB 0.25%
  • FTGC 0.98%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FTGC $18,362COMB $5,159

Year by year

YearCOMBFTGCOverpaying
10$455$1,729$1,274
20$1,769$6,504$4,735
30$5,159$18,362$13,203

Expense ratio

  • 0.25%COMB, cheaper
  • 0.98%FTGC
  • Middle half of Broad Commodity Futures funds
  • Median 0.67%

COMB 2nd cheapest of 22 funds

FTGC 20th cheapest of 22 funds

COMB vs FTGC Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
COMB 7.22%
FTGC 15.09%, better
Payout (12M)
COMB $1.91
FTGC $4.37
Last payment
COMB $1.91
FTGC $0.13
Ex-dividend
COMB Dec 29, 2025
FTGC Sep 24, 2026
Paid on
COMB Dec 31, 2025
FTGC Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
COMB Annual
FTGC Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

COMBAnnual · 9 paymentsAll COMB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2017 $0.05; Dec 28, 2018 $0.22; Dec 30, 2019 $0.36; Dec 30, 2020 $0.02; Dec 30, 2021 $4.06; Dec 28, 2022 $6.94; Dec 13, 2023 $1.13; Dec 27, 2024 $0.49; Dec 29, 2025 $1.91. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD
FTGCQuarterly · 22 paymentsAll FTGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 22 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 21, 2017 $0.25; Mar 22, 2018 $0.0095; Dec 18, 2018 $0.13; Dec 13, 2019 $0.15; Dec 23, 2021 $1.66; Jun 24, 2022 $0.0073; Dec 15, 2022 $2.53; Mar 24, 2023 $0.16; Jun 27, 2023 $0.19; Sep 22, 2023 $0.19; Dec 15, 2023 $0.21; Mar 21, 2024 $0.16; Jun 27, 2024 $0.20; Sep 26, 2024 $0.19; Dec 17, 2024 $0.18; Mar 27, 2025 $0.14; Jun 26, 2025 $0.15; Sep 25, 2025 $0.16; Dec 16, 2025 $3.66; Mar 26, 2026 $0.41; Jun 25, 2026 $0.17; Sep 24, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD

COMB vs FTGC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • COMB
  • FTGC
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: COMB −26.5% · May 2023. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
COMB 14.2%FTGC 13.4%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
COMB 0.73FTGC 0.90, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
COMB −26.5%FTGC −22.6%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
COMB 1.00FTGC 0.92

Popular comparisons

  • COMBBvsCERYA

    GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF · State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTGCCvsCERYA

    First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund · State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • COMBBvsBCIA

    GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF · abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTGCCvsBCIA

    First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund · abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • COMBBvsCMDYB

    GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF · iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTGCCvsCMDYB

    First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund · iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.