CMDY ranks 3rd and FTGC 12th of 22 funds in the Broad Commodity Futures Category.
CMDY vs FTGC
CMDY −0.69pt a year
0.29%0.98%
FTGC 5.8×the volume
90.3K523K
FTGC +3.5pt
+8.7%+12.2%
CMDY vs FTGC Performance
+51.6%+77.8%
- CMDY 0.29%, better
- FTGC 0.98%
- CMDY $713M
- FTGC $3.24B
- CMDY +26.2%
- FTGC +29.5%, better
- CMDY 10.47%
- FTGC 15.09%, better
- CMDY 99
- FTGC 35
- CMDY 90.3K sh
- FTGC 523K sh, better
- CMDY $60.42
- FTGC $29.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CMDY | FTGC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | F7 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C54 | A71Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | A83Higher | B67 |
| Durability | B68 | A87Higher |
Rank among Broad Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. CMDY and FTGC are both graded against the same 22 Broad Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CMDYB
FTGCC
In short
CMDY Commodities without the worst of the futures math. CMDY tracks the Roll Select version of the Bloomberg commodity index, where contract choice is written into the rules to ease rolling costs, and charges 0.29% to do it.
FTGC The broad-commodity fund that picks its own weights. Running since 2013, it sizes futures by volatility instead of copying a production-weighted index, and holds them through a Cayman subsidiary so tax time brings a 1099, not a K-1.
Stated mandate
CMDY The fund seeks to track an index representing a broad range of commodity exposures, using enhanced roll selection on a total-return basis.
FTGC The Fund seeks total returns through commodity exposure while aiming for a relatively stable risk profile.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CMDY vs FTGC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CMDY vs FTGC Cost
Overpaying FTGC vs CMDY
$12,410
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CMDY 0.29%
$5,952
FTGC 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CMDY | FTGC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $1,729 | $1,202 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $6,504 | $4,460 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $18,362 | $12,410 |
- 0.29%CMDY, cheaper
- 0.98%FTGC
- Middle half of Broad Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.67%
CMDY 5th cheapest of 22 funds
FTGC 20th cheapest of 22 funds
CMDY vs FTGC Dividends
- CMDY 10.47%
- FTGC 15.09%, better
- CMDY $6.29
- FTGC $4.37
- CMDY $6.29
- FTGC $0.13
- CMDY Dec 16, 2025
- FTGC Sep 24, 2026
- CMDY Dec 19, 2025
- FTGC Sep 30, 2026
- CMDY Annual
- FTGC Quarterly
Distribution history
CMDY vs FTGC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CMDY
- FTGC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CMDY 13.1%, betterFTGC 13.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- CMDY 0.79FTGC 0.90, better
- Worst fall
- CMDY −26.6%FTGC −22.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CMDY 0.90FTGC 0.92
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.