Skip to content

CMDY vs FTGC

iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF

CMDYBNYSE Arca

First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund

FTGCCNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

CMDY −0.69pt a year

CMDY0.29%FTGC0.98%

Avg volume · 30D

FTGC 5.8×the volume

CMDY90.3KFTGC523K

5Y return · a year

FTGC +3.5pt

CMDY+8.7%FTGC+12.2%

CMDY vs FTGC Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+51.6%CMDY+77.8%FTGC

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. CMDY +51.6%. FTGC +77.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%40%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CMDY 0.29%, better
FTGC 0.98%
Fund size
CMDY $713M
FTGC $3.24B
1Y total return
CMDY +26.2%
FTGC +29.5%, better
Yield (12M)
CMDY 10.47%
FTGC 15.09%, better
Holdings
CMDY 99
FTGC 35
Avg volume (30D)
CMDY 90.3K sh
FTGC 523K sh, better
NAV per share
CMDY $60.42
FTGC $29.07
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CMDY: Cost 84, Risk 54, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 83, Durability 68. FTGC: Cost 7, Risk 71, Mission not scored, Tradability 84, Holdings 67, Durability 87.
Pillar letters and Scores for CMDY, FTGC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCMDYFTGC
Cost30% weightA84HigherF7
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC54A71Higher
Tradability15% weightC50A84Higher
Holdings10% weightA83HigherB67
Durability5% weightB68A87Higher

Rank among Broad Commodity Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CMDY and FTGC are both graded against the same 22 Broad Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Broad Commodity Futures⁠

Category · 22 funds
See all 22 ›

CMDY ranks 3rd and FTGC 12th of 22 funds in the Broad Commodity Futures Category.

  1. Rank 1ACERYState Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 2ABCIabrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETFScore 73
  3. Rank 3BCMDYiShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETFScore 69
  4. Rank 3BCOMBGraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 69
  5. Rank 11CHGERHarbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER)Score 51
  6. Rank 12CFTGCFirst Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy FundScore 48
  7. Rank 12CNBCMNeuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETFScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CMDYBiShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF

FTGCCFirst Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund

In short

CMDY Commodities without the worst of the futures math. CMDY tracks the Roll Select version of the Bloomberg commodity index, where contract choice is written into the rules to ease rolling costs, and charges 0.29% to do it.

FTGC The broad-commodity fund that picks its own weights. Running since 2013, it sizes futures by volatility instead of copying a production-weighted index, and holds them through a Cayman subsidiary so tax time brings a 1099, not a K-1.

Stated mandate

CMDY The fund seeks to track an index representing a broad range of commodity exposures, using enhanced roll selection on a total-return basis.

FTGC The Fund seeks total returns through commodity exposure while aiming for a relatively stable risk profile.

Why people hold it

  • CMDY The name is the strategy. Enhanced roll selection is baked into the index it tracks, so which futures contract to hold is a rule, not an afterthought.
  • 0.29% a year sits in the low-fee tier of broad commodity funds, next to BCI, CERY and BCD, and well under what the category typically charges.
  • One ticker, a broad basket of roughly 60 futures positions, run on a total-return basis that counts collateral income alongside commodity price moves.
  • Live since 2018 under the iShares roof, and one of the stronger implementations in its broad-basket commodity peer group.
  • FTGC Genuinely active: weightings across roughly 40 commodity positions are rebalanced in an attempt to stabilize risk levels, not fixed by the production-and-liquidity math behind traditional index baskets.sec.gov
  • Futures exposure sits inside a wholly-owned Cayman subsidiary so the fund can stay within 1940 Act tax limits, which means ordinary fund reporting on a 1099 rather than a partnership K-1.sec.gov
  • One of the longer-tenured actively managed commodity ETFs, live since 2013, now a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively.
  • Distributions come quarterly, and the fund measures itself against the Bloomberg Commodity Index, so the manager's calls can be judged against the standard broad basket.

Worth knowing

  • CMDY Moderately traded rather than a volume monster. Spreads can run wider than the mega-cap index funds, which shows up most on large or hurried orders.
  • It is structured as a commodity pool, not a plain stock fund, so the tax paperwork and reporting work differently. Check the details before filing season.
  • Distributions land annually or semiannually, not monthly, and the roll rule addresses futures mechanics only. Commodity prices still swing hard on their own.
  • FTGC Active judgment carries an active price: 0.98% a year against a 0.72% median for broad commodity futures funds, with index-tracking rivals like BCI (0.26%) and CMDY (0.29%) far cheaper.
  • Risk-based weighting means the sector mix can sit well away from a production-weighted benchmark, so results can diverge from the standard commodity index in either direction.sec.gov
  • The prospectus is blunt that commodity-linked derivatives may be considered speculative and can fluctuate widely on macro and commodity-specific shocks. A stable risk profile is the aim, not a promise.sec.gov

Full CMDY profile⁠

Full FTGC profile⁠

CMDY vs FTGC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CMDY vs FTGC Cost

Overpaying FTGC vs CMDY

$12,410

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CMDY 0.29%

    $5,952

  • FTGC 0.98%

    $18,362

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CMDY 0.29%
  • FTGC 0.98%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FTGC $18,362CMDY $5,952

Year by year

YearCMDYFTGCOverpaying
10$527$1,729$1,202
20$2,044$6,504$4,460
30$5,952$18,362$12,410

Expense ratio

  • 0.29%CMDY, cheaper
  • 0.98%FTGC
  • Middle half of Broad Commodity Futures funds
  • Median 0.67%

CMDY 5th cheapest of 22 funds

FTGC 20th cheapest of 22 funds

CMDY vs FTGC Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
CMDY 10.47%
FTGC 15.09%, better
Payout (12M)
CMDY $6.29
FTGC $4.37
Last payment
CMDY $6.29
FTGC $0.13
Ex-dividend
CMDY Dec 16, 2025
FTGC Sep 24, 2026
Paid on
CMDY Dec 19, 2025
FTGC Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
CMDY Annual
FTGC Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

CMDYAnnual · 8 paymentsAll CMDY payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2018 $0.76; Dec 16, 2019 $1.00; Dec 14, 2020 $0.07; Dec 13, 2021 $7.96; Dec 13, 2022 $2.17; Dec 20, 2023 $2.40; Dec 17, 2024 $2.01; Dec 16, 2025 $6.29. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD
FTGCQuarterly · 22 paymentsAll FTGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 22 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 21, 2017 $0.25; Mar 22, 2018 $0.0095; Dec 18, 2018 $0.13; Dec 13, 2019 $0.15; Dec 23, 2021 $1.66; Jun 24, 2022 $0.0073; Dec 15, 2022 $2.53; Mar 24, 2023 $0.16; Jun 27, 2023 $0.19; Sep 22, 2023 $0.19; Dec 15, 2023 $0.21; Mar 21, 2024 $0.16; Jun 27, 2024 $0.20; Sep 26, 2024 $0.19; Dec 17, 2024 $0.18; Mar 27, 2025 $0.14; Jun 26, 2025 $0.15; Sep 25, 2025 $0.16; Dec 16, 2025 $3.66; Mar 26, 2026 $0.41; Jun 25, 2026 $0.17; Sep 24, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD

CMDY vs FTGC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • CMDY
  • FTGC
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: CMDY −26.6% · Feb 2024. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CMDY 13.1%, betterFTGC 13.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CMDY 0.79FTGC 0.90, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CMDY −26.6%FTGC −22.6%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CMDY 0.90FTGC 0.92

Popular comparisons

  • CMDYBvsCERYA

    iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF · State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTGCCvsCERYA

    First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund · State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CMDYBvsBCIA

    iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF · abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTGCCvsBCIA

    First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund · abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CMDYBvsCOMBB

    iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF · GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTGCCvsCOMBB

    First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund · GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.