Skip to content

COMB vs PIT

GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF

COMBANYSE Arca

VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF

PITCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

COMB −0.30pt a year

COMB0.25%PIT0.55%

Avg volume · 30D

PIT 1.4×the volume

COMB39.2KPIT55.9K

3Y return · a year

PIT +10.2pt

COMB+14.8%PIT+25.0%

COMB vs PIT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+35.3%COMB+64.7%PIT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. COMB +35.3%. PIT +64.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
COMB 0.25%, better
PIT 0.55%
Fund size
COMB $159M
PIT $512M
1Y total return
COMB +35.3%
PIT +64.7%, better
Yield (12M)
COMB 6.88%, better
PIT 5.58%
Holdings
COMB 28
PIT 5
Avg volume (30D)
COMB 39.2K sh
PIT 55.9K sh, better
NAV per share
COMB $27.90
PIT $84.58
52W range

ETF.net Grade

COMB: Cost 93, Risk 52, Mission not scored, Tradability 48, Holdings not scored, Durability 30. PIT: Cost 61, Risk 44, Mission not scored, Tradability 48, Holdings not scored, Durability 45.
Pillar letters and Scores for COMB, PIT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCOMBPIT
Cost30% weightA93HigherB61
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC52HigherC44
Tradability15% weightC48C48
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightD30C45Higher

Rank among Broad Commodity Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. COMB and PIT are both graded against the same 21 Broad Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Broad Commodity Futures⁠

Category · 21 funds
See all 21 ›

COMB ranks 3rd and PIT 8th of 21 funds in the Broad Commodity Futures Category.

  1. Rank 1ACERYState Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2ACMDYiShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETFScore 69
  3. Rank 3ACOMBGraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 68
  4. Rank 4BSDMFSimplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETFScore 67
  5. Rank 8CCOMDirexion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETFScore 53
  6. Rank 8CPITVanEck Commodity Strategy ETFScore 53
  7. Rank 10CHGERHarbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER)Score 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

COMBAGraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF

PITCVanEck Commodity Strategy ETF

In short

COMB The cheapest ticket in the K-1-free commodity aisle: 0.25% for a broad basket of energy, metals, grain and livestock futures, wrapped so your tax packet is a Form 1099 instead of a Schedule K-1.

PIT Most broad commodity funds hand the wheel to an index. PIT is VanEck's active take: a compact book of commodity futures where a manager picks the exposures, priced below the typical fund in its group.

Stated mandate

COMB The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation mainly through exposure to commodity futures markets.

PIT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio focused primarily on commodity futures and related commodity instruments.

Why people hold it

  • COMB At 0.25%, the lowest fee among the category's top-scoring broad commodity funds (BCI 0.26%, CERY 0.28%, CMDY 0.29%, BCD 0.30%) and below the category median.
  • Gains its futures exposure through a wholly owned Cayman subsidiary, so the fund is designed to be taxed like a conventional fund and issue a 1099, not a K-1.sec.gov
  • Benchmarked to the Bloomberg Commodity Index: about 30 positions across energy, metals, agriculture and livestock, with index rules capping any commodity group at 33%.bbhub.io
  • Live since 2017, long enough to have run through a full commodity boom and bust, and it sits in the top quartile of its peer group.
  • PIT Active by design: roughly 30 futures and commodity-linked positions picked by VanEck's team instead of a fixed index recipe, with a stated goal of long-term capital appreciation.
  • 0.55% a year sits below the typical broad commodity futures fund, so the active mandate does not carry an active price tag relative to the group.
  • Exposure runs through exchange-traded commodity futures and commodity-linked instruments rather than bars in a vault, so there is no physical metal or barrel to store.
  • Lands in the upper half of the broad commodity futures basket group on the fundamentals: cost, tradability and structure.

Worth knowing

  • COMB Thinly traded next to the category's household names, so spreads can widen. Matters most on bigger orders.
  • Returns ride the futures curve, not spot prices. Rolling contracts forward can add to or subtract from the move in a commodity's headline price.graniteshares.com
  • Actively managed rather than a strict index clone, with Treasury bills as collateral and cash paid out annually or semiannually, not monthly.graniteshares.com
  • PIT Commodity futures swing on weather, supply shocks and the dollar, and there are no stocks or bonds in here to soften a drawdown.
  • Index-tracking rivals cost less: BCI at 0.26% and CMDY at 0.29% against 0.55% here. Active management is the thing you are paying the gap for.
  • A December 2022 launch with distributions once or twice a year at most: short history, capital-appreciation mandate, not an income stream.

Full COMB profile⁠

Full PIT profile⁠

COMB vs PIT Holdings

How COMB and PIT differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of COMB and 0.0% of PIT.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classCommodities100%

Sector

No Sector split for COMB and PIT.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for COMB.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • COMB78.2%
  • PIT100.0%

Securities held

  • COMB27
  • PIT1

Asset class

COMB
Commodities
PIT
Commodities

Holdings

  • Only in COMB27
  • In both0
  • Only in PIT1

Only in COMB

27 securities, 93.3% of COMB by weight

  • US TBill 02/18/202724.88%
  • US TBill 04/15/202718.54%
  • Brent Crude Oil Jan276.32%

Only in PIT

1 security, 95.5% of PIT by weight

  • United States Treasury Bill95.50%

Weight gaps

COMB and PIT share no securities.

All 33 COMB holdings⁠All 34 PIT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

COMB vs PIT Cost

Overpaying PIT vs COMB

$5,745

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • COMB 0.25%

    $5,159

  • PIT 0.55%

    $10,904

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • COMB 0.25%
  • PIT 0.55%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530PIT $10,904COMB $5,159

Year by year

YearCOMBPITOverpaying
10$455$988$533
20$1,769$3,790$2,021
30$5,159$10,904$5,745

Expense ratio

  • 0.25%COMB, cheaper
  • 0.55%PIT
  • Middle half of Broad Commodity Futures funds
  • Median 0.68%

COMB 2nd cheapest of 21 funds

PIT 8th cheapest of 21 funds

COMB vs PIT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
COMB 6.88%, better
PIT 5.58%
Payout (12M)
COMB $1.91
PIT $4.71
Last payment
COMB $1.91
PIT $4.71
Ex-dividend
COMB Dec 29, 2025
PIT Dec 22, 2025
Paid on
COMB Dec 31, 2025
PIT Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
COMB Annual
PIT Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

COMBAnnual · 9 paymentsAll COMB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2017 $0.05; Dec 28, 2018 $0.22; Dec 30, 2019 $0.36; Dec 30, 2020 $0.02; Dec 30, 2021 $4.06; Dec 28, 2022 $6.94; Dec 13, 2023 $1.13; Dec 27, 2024 $0.49; Dec 29, 2025 $1.91. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD
PITAnnual · 3 paymentsAll PIT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2023 $2.96; Dec 23, 2024 $1.70; Dec 22, 2025 $4.71. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD

COMB vs PIT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
COMB 14.2%, betterPIT 17.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
COMB 0.73PIT 1.10, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
COMB −26.5%PIT −17.2%since Dec 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
COMB 1.00PIT 1.13

Popular comparisons

  • COMBAvsCERYA

    GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF · State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PITCvsCERYA

    VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF · State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • COMBAvsCMDYA

    GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF · iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PITCvsCMDYA

    VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF · iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • COMBAvsSDMFB

    GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF · Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PITCvsSDMFB

    VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF · Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.