Skip to content

CERY vs PIT

State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

CERYANYSE Arca

VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF

PITCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

CERY −0.27pt a year

CERY0.28%PIT0.55%

Avg volume · 30D

CERY 3.9×the volume

CERY216KPIT55.9K

CERY vs PIT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+43.1%CERY+64.7%PIT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CERY +43.1%. PIT +64.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CERY 0.28%, better
PIT 0.55%
Fund size
CERY $1.27B
PIT $512M
1Y total return
CERY +43.1%
PIT +64.7%, better
Yield (12M)
CERY 3.59%
PIT 5.58%, better
Holdings
CERY 12
PIT 5
Avg volume (30D)
CERY 216K sh, better
PIT 55.9K sh
NAV per share
CERY $39.89
PIT $84.58
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CERY: Cost 84, Risk 66, Mission not scored, Tradability 78, Holdings not scored, Durability 64. PIT: Cost 61, Risk 44, Mission not scored, Tradability 48, Holdings not scored, Durability 45.
Pillar letters and Scores for CERY, PIT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCERYPIT
Cost30% weightA84HigherB61
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB66HigherC44
Tradability15% weightA78HigherC48
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB64HigherC45

Rank among Broad Commodity Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CERY and PIT are both graded against the same 21 Broad Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Broad Commodity Futures⁠

Category · 21 funds
See all 21 ›

CERY ranks 1st and PIT 8th of 21 funds in the Broad Commodity Futures Category.

  1. Rank 1ACERYState Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2ACMDYiShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETFScore 69
  3. Rank 8CCOMDirexion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETFScore 53
  4. Rank 8CPITVanEck Commodity Strategy ETFScore 53
  5. Rank 10CHGERHarbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER)Score 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CERYAState Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

PITCVanEck Commodity Strategy ETF

In short

CERY Broad commodity exposure without the K-1 envelope. CERY tracks Bloomberg's Enhanced Roll Yield index, a rules-based long-only basket held through synthetic futures, and charges 0.28% in a category where the typical fee is far higher.

PIT Most broad commodity funds hand the wheel to an index. PIT is VanEck's active take: a compact book of commodity futures where a manager picks the exposures, priced below the typical fund in its group.

Stated mandate

CERY The fund seeks to track the Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Total Return Index, which represents diversified, long-only exposure to broad commodities through synthetic futures positions.

PIT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio focused primarily on commodity futures and related commodity instruments.

Why people hold it

  • CERY Costs 0.28% a year against a category norm nearer 0.68%. Fees bite hard in commodity futures funds, where there are no dividends to paper over the drag.
  • Tracks Bloomberg's Enhanced Roll Yield index: rules-based, long-only commodity exposure via synthetic futures. Roll mechanics come from index design, not a manager's call.ssga.com
  • Built as a 1940 Act fund, so shareholders get a 1099 rather than the partnership K-1 that many commodity futures vehicles send.ssga.com
  • Sits with BCI and BCD at the low-fee end of the broad commodity futures group and rates among the strongest implementations in it.
  • PIT Active by design: roughly 30 futures and commodity-linked positions picked by VanEck's team instead of a fixed index recipe, with a stated goal of long-term capital appreciation.
  • 0.55% a year sits below the typical broad commodity futures fund, so the active mandate does not carry an active price tag relative to the group.
  • Exposure runs through exchange-traded commodity futures and commodity-linked instruments rather than bars in a vault, so there is no physical metal or barrel to store.
  • Lands in the upper half of the broad commodity futures basket group on the fundamentals: cost, tradability and structure.

Worth knowing

  • CERY Launched in 2024, so the record is short. The roll rules have not been tested across a full commodity cycle yet.
  • Long-only by design. There is no short side, so a broad commodity downturn passes straight through to the fund.
  • Distributions come once or twice a year. This is commodity price exposure, not a paycheck.
  • PIT Commodity futures swing on weather, supply shocks and the dollar, and there are no stocks or bonds in here to soften a drawdown.
  • Index-tracking rivals cost less: BCI at 0.26% and CMDY at 0.29% against 0.55% here. Active management is the thing you are paying the gap for.
  • A December 2022 launch with distributions once or twice a year at most: short history, capital-appreciation mandate, not an income stream.

Full CERY profile⁠

Full PIT profile⁠

CERY vs PIT Holdings

How CERY and PIT differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CERY and 0.0% of PIT.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classCommodities100%

Sector

No Sector split for CERY and PIT.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for CERY.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CERY99.4%
  • PIT100.0%

Securities held

  • CERY3
  • PIT1

Asset class

CERY
Commodities
PIT
Commodities

Holdings

  • Only in CERY3
  • In both0
  • Only in PIT1

Only in CERY

3 securities, 19.6% of CERY by weight

  • Treasury Bill 12/26 0.000009.20%
  • Treasury Bill 11/26 0.000007.22%
  • Trs USD Berytr3.18%

Only in PIT

1 security, 95.5% of PIT by weight

  • United States Treasury Bill95.50%

Weight gaps

CERY and PIT share no securities.

All 9 CERY holdings⁠All 34 PIT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CERY vs PIT Cost

Overpaying PIT vs CERY

$5,149

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CERY 0.28%

    $5,755

  • PIT 0.55%

    $10,904

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CERY 0.28%
  • PIT 0.55%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530PIT $10,904CERY $5,755

Year by year

YearCERYPITOverpaying
10$509$988$479
20$1,976$3,790$1,814
30$5,755$10,904$5,149

Expense ratio

  • 0.28%CERY, cheaper
  • 0.55%PIT
  • Middle half of Broad Commodity Futures funds
  • Median 0.68%

CERY 3rd cheapest of 21 funds

PIT 8th cheapest of 21 funds

CERY vs PIT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CERY 3.59%
PIT 5.58%, better
Payout (12M)
CERY $1.43
PIT $4.71
Last payment
CERY $1.43
PIT $4.71
Ex-dividend
CERY Dec 29, 2025
PIT Dec 22, 2025
Paid on
CERY Dec 31, 2025
PIT Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
CERY Annual
PIT Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CERYAnnual · 2 paymentsAll CERY payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2024 $0.14; Dec 29, 2025 $1.43. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD
PITAnnual · 3 paymentsAll PIT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2023 $2.96; Dec 23, 2024 $1.70; Dec 22, 2025 $4.71. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

CERY vs PIT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CERY 14.0%since Oct 2024PIT 17.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CERY 1.41since Oct 2024PIT 1.10
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CERY −14.3%since Sep 2024PIT −17.2%since Dec 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CERY 0.03PIT 1.13

CERY and PIT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CERYAvsCMDYA

    State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF · iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.28% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PITCvsCMDYA

    VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF · iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CERYAvsCOMBA

    State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF · GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.28% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PITCvsCOMBA

    VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF · GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CERYAvsSDMFB

    State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF · Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.28% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PITCvsSDMFB

    VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF · Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.