CMDY ranks 2nd and PIT 8th of 21 funds in the Broad Commodity Futures Category.
CMDY vs PIT
0.0%by weight
CMDY −0.26pt a year
0.29%0.55%
CMDY 1.6×the volume
90.8K55.9K
PIT +10.1pt
+14.9%+25.0%
CMDY vs PIT Performance
+32.5%+64.7%
- CMDY 0.29%, better
- PIT 0.55%
- CMDY $743M
- PIT $512M
- CMDY +32.5%
- PIT +64.7%, better
- CMDY 9.96%, better
- PIT 5.58%
- CMDY 108
- PIT 5
- CMDY 90.8K sh, better
- PIT 55.9K sh
- CMDY $63.21
- PIT $84.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CMDY | PIT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | B61 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C52Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | C47 | C48Higher |
| Holdings | A85 | |
| Durability | B67Higher | C45 |
Rank among Broad Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. CMDY and PIT are both graded against the same 21 Broad Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CMDYA
PITC
In short
CMDY Commodities without the worst of the futures math. CMDY tracks the Roll Select version of the Bloomberg commodity index, where contract choice is written into the rules to ease rolling costs, and charges 0.29% to do it.
PIT Most broad commodity funds hand the wheel to an index. PIT is VanEck's active take: a compact book of commodity futures where a manager picks the exposures, priced below the typical fund in its group.
Stated mandate
CMDY The fund seeks to track an index representing a broad range of commodity exposures, using enhanced roll selection on a total-return basis.
PIT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio focused primarily on commodity futures and related commodity instruments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CMDY vs PIT Holdings
How CMDY and PIT differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CMDY and 0.0% of PIT.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
- Country89.7%
Sector
No Sector split for PIT.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CMDYMore in PIT | CMDY | PIT |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | PIT +10.3 points | 89.7% | 100.0% |
| Canada | CMDY +4.7 points | 4.7% | 0.0% |
| Singapore | CMDY +1.7 points | 1.6% | 0.0% |
| Australia | CMDY +1.4 points | 1.4% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | CMDY +1.2 points | 1.2% | 0.0% |
| Sweden | CMDY +1.2 points | 1.2% | 0.0% |
| Finland | CMDY +0.3 points | 0.3% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- CMDY28.2%
- PIT100.0%
- CMDY52
- PIT1
Asset class
- CMDY
- Commodities
- PIT
- Commodities
Holdings
- Only in CMDY52
- In both0
- Only in PIT1
Only in CMDY
52 securities, 91.1% of CMDY by weight
- Treasury Bill26.35%
- Spire Inc 144A2.29%
- Procter & Gamble Company (The) 144A2.15%
- Extra Space Storage Lp 144A2.02%
- Florida Power and Light Co2.02%
- Concord Minutemen Capital Co 144A1.96%
- Archer Daniels Midland 144A1.92%
- Bunge Ltd Finance Corp 144A1.90%
- Fidelity Natl Info Serv 144A1.89%
- Ntt Finance Americas Inc 144A1.89%
- American Honda Finance Corporation1.89%
- Crh America Finance Inc 144A1.85%
- Glencore Funding Llc 144A1.81%
- Penske Truck Leasing Co Lp 144A1.77%
- Nutrien Ltd 144A1.70%
- Mitsubishi Hc Fin Amer 144A1.68%
- Dbs Bank Ltd 144A1.65%
- Columbia Funding Company Llc 144A1.59%
- Ppg Industries Inc.1.57%
- Macquarie Group Ltd 144A1.37%
- Sheffield Receivables Corp 144A1.36%
- Lseg Us Fin Corp 144A1.34%
- Komatsu Finance America Inc. 144A1.34%
- Enbridge (Us) Inc 144A1.29%
- Brookfield Corporate Treasury Ltd 144A1.24%
- American Electric Power Company In 144A1.19%
- Parker Hannifin Corp 144A1.18%
- Bay Square Funding Llc 144A1.18%
- Compo Funding Co Llc 144A1.18%
- Reckitt Benckiser Tsy 144A1.17%
- Marubeni Finance America 144A1.17%
- Svenska Handelsbanken Ab 144A1.16%
- Ontario (Province Of)1.14%
- Dte Electric Co1.12%
- Vw Credit Inc 144A1.09%
- Ionic Iv1.07%
- Glencove Funding Llc 144A1.04%
- Ionic Funding Llc Series Iii1.03%
- Koch Companies Llc0.94%
- Aquitaine Funding Company Llc 144A0.94%
- Reliance Funding Co Llc 144A0.91%
- Gotham Funding 144A0.81%
- Bennington Stark Cap Co 144A0.79%
- Tokeneke Funding Co Llc 144A0.76%
- Rtx Corp 144A0.64%
- Enbridge Inc 144A0.60%
- Virginia Electric and Power Compan0.54%
- Sumitomo Corp of America0.40%
- Helvetica Funding Co Llc 144A0.40%
- Nordea Bank Abp 144A0.34%
Only in PIT
1 security, 95.5% of PIT by weight
- United States Treasury Bill95.50%
Weight gaps
CMDY and PIT share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CMDY vs PIT Cost
Overpaying PIT vs CMDY
$4,952
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CMDY 0.29%
$5,952
PIT 0.55%
$10,904
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CMDY | PIT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $988 | $461 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $3,790 | $1,746 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $10,904 | $4,952 |
- 0.29%CMDY, cheaper
- 0.55%PIT
- Middle half of Broad Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.68%
CMDY 4th cheapest of 21 funds
PIT 8th cheapest of 21 funds
CMDY vs PIT Dividends
- CMDY 9.96%, better
- PIT 5.58%
- CMDY $6.29
- PIT $4.71
- CMDY $6.29
- PIT $4.71
- CMDY Dec 16, 2025
- PIT Dec 22, 2025
- CMDY Dec 19, 2025
- PIT Dec 26, 2025
- CMDY Annual
- PIT Annual
Distribution history
CMDY vs PIT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CMDY 13.1%, betterPIT 17.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- CMDY 0.79PIT 1.10, better
- Worst fall
- CMDY −26.6%PIT −17.2%
- Market sensitivity
- CMDY 0.90PIT 1.13
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.