CONI ranks 23rd and SKHZ 27th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
CONI vs SKHZ
0.0%by weight
SKHZ −0.96pt a year
1.71%0.75%
SKHZ 7.2×the volume
263K1.9M
CONI vs SKHZ Performance
−27.2%−14.7%
- CONI 1.71%
- SKHZ 0.75%, better
- CONI $10M
- SKHZ $4M
- CONI +11.2%
- SKHZ
- CONI 1.51%
- SKHZ
- CONI 1
- SKHZ 2
- CONI 263K sh
- SKHZ 1.9M sh, better
- CONI $36.53
- SKHZ $11.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CONI | SKHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F7 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B56 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | B55 | A71Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B57Higher | F20 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. CONI and SKHZ are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CONIC
SKHZA
In short
CONI The heavier short on Coinbase. CONI aims for -2 times COIN's move each day, where most single-stock bear funds stop at -1x. Cost is 1.15% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026, and the exposure resets daily.
Stated mandate
CONI The Fund seeks daily inverse results equal to -2 times the daily percentage change of Coinbase Global Inc.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CONI vs SKHZ Holdings
How CONI and SKHZ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CONI and 0.0% of SKHZ.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for SKHZ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CONIMore in SKHZ | CONI | SKHZ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- CONI199.9%
- SKHZ200.0%
- CONI1
- SKHZ1
Asset class
- CONI
- Leveraged/Inverse
- SKHZ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in CONI1
- In both0
- Only in SKHZ1
Only in CONI
1 security, 100% of CONI by weight
- Coin199.92%
Only in SKHZ
1 security, 46.4% of SKHZ by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204046.40%
Weight gaps
CONI and SKHZ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CONI vs SKHZ Cost
Overpaying CONI vs SKHZ
$14,693
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CONI 1.71%
$29,175
SKHZ 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CONI | SKHZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,927 | $1,336 | $1,591 |
| 20 | $10,659 | $5,078 | $5,581 |
| 30 | $29,175 | $14,482 | $14,693 |
- 1.71%CONI
- 0.75%SKHZ, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
SKHZ cheapest of 43 funds
CONI 39th cheapest of 43 funds
CONI vs SKHZ Dividends
- CONI 1.51%
- SKHZ
- CONI $0.60
- SKHZ None
- CONI $0.60
- SKHZ
- CONI Dec 29, 2025
- SKHZ
- CONI Dec 31, 2025
- SKHZ
- CONI Annual
- SKHZ
Distribution history
CONI vs SKHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CONI 112.3%SKHZ
- Return per unit of risk
- CONI −0.46SKHZ
- Worst fall
- CONI −96.2%SKHZ
- Market sensitivity
- CONI −4.23SKHZ 0.00
Popular comparisons
- 1.71% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.71% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.71% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.