TSDD ranks 2nd and SKHZ 3rd of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
SKHZ vs TSDD
0.0%by weight
SKHZ −0.23pt a year
0.75%0.98%
TSDD 5.8×the volume
1.9M11M
SKHZ vs TSDD Performance
−15.5%−46.0%
- SKHZ 0.75%, better
- TSDD 0.98%
- SKHZ $4M
- TSDD $31M
- SKHZ
- TSDD −24.7%
- SKHZ
- TSDD 10.55%
- SKHZ 2
- TSDD 1
- SKHZ 1.9M sh
- TSDD 11M sh, better
- SKHZ $11.21
- TSDD $6.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SKHZ | TSDD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A94 |
| Mission | A98 | |
| Risk | A75Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | A71 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | F20 | A72Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. SKHZ and TSDD are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SKHZA
TSDDA
In short
TSDD Tesla bears pick their dosage; this is the double. TSDD aims for -2x TSLA's move each day, reset daily, at 0.95% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026. Designed as a short-term tool, not a buy-and-forget holding.
Stated mandate
TSDD The fund seeks daily results before fees and expenses equal to negative 200% of the daily percentage change in Tesla's common stock. It is designed as a short-term inverse leveraged vehicle.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SKHZ vs TSDD Holdings
How SKHZ and TSDD differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of SKHZ and 0.0% of TSDD.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for SKHZ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in SKHZMore in TSDD | SKHZ | TSDD |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- SKHZ199.9%
- TSDD199.9%
- SKHZ1
- TSDD1
Asset class
- SKHZ
- Equity
- TSDD
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in SKHZ1
- In both0
- Only in TSDD1
Only in SKHZ
1 security, 54.6% of SKHZ by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204054.56%
Only in TSDD
1 security, 100% of TSDD by weight
- Tsla199.89%
Weight gaps
SKHZ and TSDD share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SKHZ vs TSDD Cost
Overpaying TSDD vs SKHZ
$3,880
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SKHZ 0.75%
$14,482
TSDD 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SKHZ | TSDD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,729 | $393 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $6,504 | $1,426 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $18,362 | $3,880 |
- 0.75%SKHZ, cheaper
- 0.98%TSDD
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
SKHZ cheapest of 43 funds
TSDD 5th cheapest of 43 funds
SKHZ vs TSDD Dividends
- SKHZ
- TSDD 10.55%
- SKHZ None
- TSDD $0.65
- SKHZ
- TSDD $0.65
- SKHZ
- TSDD Dec 29, 2025
- SKHZ
- TSDD Dec 31, 2025
- SKHZ
- TSDD Irregular
Distribution history
SKHZ vs TSDD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SKHZ TSDD 100.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- SKHZ TSDD −0.87
- Worst fall
- SKHZ TSDD −99.1%
- Market sensitivity
- SKHZ 0.00TSDD −2.40
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.