COTG ranks 3rd and CRWL 110th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
COTG vs CRWL
COTG −0.90pt a year
0.77%1.67%
CRWL 1.4×the volume
97.2K140K
COTG vs CRWL Performance
+16.3%+72.0%
- COTG 0.77%, better
- CRWL 1.67%
- COTG $9M
- CRWL $47M
- COTG +16.3%
- CRWL +72.0%, better
- COTG 4
- CRWL 2
- COTG 97.2K sh
- CRWL 140K sh, better
- COTG $15.32
- CRWL $65.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COTG | CRWL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B61Higher | F2 |
| Mission | A95 | A99Higher |
| Risk | A86Higher | A74 |
| Tradability | A77 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B56 | A78Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. COTG and CRWL are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COTGA
CRWLC
In short
COTG Most single-stock leverage chases chips and crypto. COTG points it at a warehouse club, aiming to deliver 200% of Costco's daily move before fees, and resetting the clock every session.
CRWL A one-day trade on CrowdStrike. CRWL aims to deliver twice CRWD's daily move, resets every night, and makes no claim on any longer stretch. GraniteShares has run it since 2024, and it has stayed close to that 2x daily target.
Stated mandate
COTG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation stock, before fees and expenses.
CRWL The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily percentage change of CrowdStrike Holdings Inc.'s common stock, before fees and expenses. The objective is measured daily and is not intended to track twice the cumulative return over periods longer than one day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COTG vs CRWL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COTG vs CRWL Cost
Overpaying CRWL vs COTG
$13,808
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COTG 0.77%
$14,829
CRWL 1.67%
$28,637
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COTG | CRWL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,371 | $2,863 | $1,492 |
| 20 | $5,205 | $10,445 | $5,240 |
| 30 | $14,829 | $28,637 | $13,808 |
- 0.77%COTG, cheaper
- 1.67%CRWL
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
COTG 135th cheapest of 312 funds
CRWL 305th cheapest of 312 funds
COTG vs CRWL Dividends
- COTG None
- CRWL None
Distribution history
COTG vs CRWL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COTG 38.3%CRWL 134.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- COTG 0.12CRWL 0.90
- Worst fall
- COTG −36.4%CRWL −65.0%
- Market sensitivity
- COTG −0.04CRWL 4.67
COTG and CRWL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.67% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.67% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.67% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

