Skip to content

COTG vs LULG

Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF

COTGANasdaq

Leverage Shares 2x Long LULU Daily ETF

LULGBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

LULG −0.02pt a year

COTG0.77%LULG0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

LULG 4.9×the volume

COTG97.2KLULG477K

COTG vs LULG Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+16.3%COTG−68.6%LULG

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. COTG +16.3%. LULG −68.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%−25%0%50%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
COTG 0.77%
LULG 0.75%, better
Fund size
COTG $9M
LULG $6M
1Y total return
COTG +16.3%, better
LULG −68.6%
Holdings
COTG 4
LULG 4
Avg volume (30D)
COTG 97.2K sh
LULG 477K sh, better
NAV per share
COTG $15.32
LULG $4.86
52W range

ETF.net Grade

COTG: Cost 61, Risk 86, Mission 95, Tradability 77, Holdings not scored, Durability 56. LULG: Cost 70, Risk 50, Mission 93, Tradability 74, Holdings not scored, Durability 52.
Pillar letters and Scores for COTG, LULG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCOTGLULG
Cost30% weightB61A70Higher
Mission25% weightA95HigherA93
Risk15% weightA86HigherC50
Tradability15% weightA77HigherA74
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB56HigherC52

Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. COTG and LULG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Long Leveraged⁠

Category · 312 funds
See all 312 ›

COTG ranks 3rd and LULG 21st of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.

  1. Rank 1AUNHGLeverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETFScore 74
  2. Rank 2ATSMGLeverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETFScore 73
  3. Rank 3ACOTGLeverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 3AOKTGLeverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETFScore 70
  5. Rank 21BKLAGLeverage Shares 2X Long KLAC Daily ETFScore 64
  6. Rank 21BLULGLeverage Shares 2x Long LULU Daily ETFScore 64
  7. Rank 21BSNDGLeverage Shares 2X Long SNDK Daily ETFScore 64

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

COTGALeverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF

LULGBLeverage Shares 2x Long LULU Daily ETF

In short

COTG Most single-stock leverage chases chips and crypto. COTG points it at a warehouse club, aiming to deliver 200% of Costco's daily move before fees, and resetting the clock every session.

LULG Leveraged single-stock ETFs mostly chase megacap tech. LULG points the same machinery at lululemon, aiming for 200% of the stock's daily move, and charges 0.75% to do it.

Stated mandate

COTG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation stock, before fees and expenses.

LULG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of lululemon athletica inc stock, before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • COTG A plain mandate, plainly stated: 200% of Costco's daily move, before fees and expenses. No index to second-guess, no stock-picking layered on top.leverageshares.com
  • Costs less than the typical fund in the 2x single-stock crowd, and there's no temporary waiver holding that number down.
  • It has tracked its 2x daily target closely since its 2025 launch, putting it among the stronger implementations in a crowded peer group.
  • LULG 0.75% a year, below the typical leveraged single-stock fund and under the 0.96% Direxion charges on 2x bull products like AAPU and GGLL.
  • The mandate is narrow and literal: 200% of lululemon's daily performance, before fees. No stock picking, no discretion, one job.leverageshares.com
  • It has hewed closely to that stated daily target, and stands among the stronger implementations in a crowded leveraged single-stock cohort.
  • Standard 1940 Act ETF wrapper, so the leverage arrives inside an ordinary brokerage account with no margin loan to service and no options to roll.leverageshares.com

Worth knowing

  • COTG Daily reset. Hold past one session and compounding takes over, so multi-week results can drift well away from 2x Costco. The issuer frames it as a tactical, often single-day tool.leverageshares.com
  • One stock, doubled. A single earnings print lands twice as hard on the day, with no second holding to cushion it.
  • Not one of the category's most heavily traded names, so the spread and the order type are worth a look.
  • LULG The 2x target resets daily. Hold past a session and compounding takes over, so multi-day results can drift well away from twice the stock's move.
  • Everything rides on one apparel retailer. An earnings miss or a guidance cut lands here at double strength, with no other holdings to soften it.
  • Launched in November 2025, so there is little history to judge it on, and it pays no distributions. Returns come from price alone.

Full COTG profile⁠

Full LULG profile⁠

COTG vs LULG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

COTG vs LULG Cost

Overpaying COTG vs LULG

$347

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • COTG 0.77%

    $14,829

  • LULG 0.75%

    $14,482

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • COTG 0.77%
  • LULG 0.75%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530COTG $14,829LULG $14,482

Year by year

YearCOTGLULGOverpaying
10$1,371$1,336$35
20$5,205$5,078$127
30$14,829$14,482$347

Expense ratio

  • 0.77%COTG
  • 0.75%LULG, cheaper
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
  • Median 0.97%

LULG 87th cheapest of 312 funds

COTG 135th cheapest of 312 funds

COTG vs LULG Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
COTG None
LULG None

Distribution history

COTGAll COTG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

LULGAll LULG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

COTG vs LULG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
COTG 38.3%since Oct 2025LULG No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
COTG 0.12since Oct 2025LULG No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
COTG −36.4%since Sep 2025LULG −86.7%since Nov 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
COTG −0.04LULG −0.28

COTG and LULG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • COTGAvsUNHGA

    Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LULGBvsUNHGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long LULU Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • COTGAvsTSMGA

    Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LULGBvsTSMGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long LULU Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • COTGAvsOKTGA

    Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LULGBvsOKTGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long LULU Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.