COTG ranks 3rd and LULG 21st of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
COTG vs LULG
LULG −0.02pt a year
0.77%0.75%
LULG 4.9×the volume
97.2K477K
COTG vs LULG Performance
+16.3%−68.6%
- COTG 0.77%
- LULG 0.75%, better
- COTG $9M
- LULG $6M
- COTG +16.3%, better
- LULG −68.6%
- COTG 4
- LULG 4
- COTG 97.2K sh
- LULG 477K sh, better
- COTG $15.32
- LULG $4.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COTG | LULG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B61 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A95Higher | A93 |
| Risk | A86Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | A77Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B56Higher | C52 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. COTG and LULG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COTGA
LULGB
In short
COTG Most single-stock leverage chases chips and crypto. COTG points it at a warehouse club, aiming to deliver 200% of Costco's daily move before fees, and resetting the clock every session.
LULG Leveraged single-stock ETFs mostly chase megacap tech. LULG points the same machinery at lululemon, aiming for 200% of the stock's daily move, and charges 0.75% to do it.
Stated mandate
COTG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation stock, before fees and expenses.
LULG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of lululemon athletica inc stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COTG vs LULG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COTG vs LULG Cost
Overpaying COTG vs LULG
$347
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COTG 0.77%
$14,829
LULG 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COTG | LULG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,371 | $1,336 | $35 |
| 20 | $5,205 | $5,078 | $127 |
| 30 | $14,829 | $14,482 | $347 |
- 0.77%COTG
- 0.75%LULG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
LULG 87th cheapest of 312 funds
COTG 135th cheapest of 312 funds
COTG vs LULG Dividends
- COTG None
- LULG None
Distribution history
COTG vs LULG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COTG 38.3%LULG
- Return per unit of risk
- COTG 0.12LULG
- Worst fall
- COTG −36.4%LULG −86.7%
- Market sensitivity
- COTG −0.04LULG −0.28
COTG and LULG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


