Skip to content

COTG vs SNAG

Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF

COTGANasdaq

Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF

SNAGCNasdaq

Overlap

9.7%by weight

Expense ratio

SNAG −0.02pt a year

COTG0.77%SNAG0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

COTG 1.7×the volume

COTG97.2KSNAG56.6K

COTG vs SNAG Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+35.9%COTG−75.3%SNAG

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. COTG +35.9%. SNAG −75.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%−25%0%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
COTG 0.77%
SNAG 0.75%, better
Fund size
COTG $9M
SNAG $1M
1Y total return
COTG +16.3%
SNAG No data
Holdings
COTG 4
SNAG 5
Avg volume (30D)
COTG 97.2K sh, better
SNAG 56.6K sh
NAV per share
COTG $15.32
SNAG $4.13
52W range

ETF.net Grade

COTG: Cost 61, Risk 86, Mission 95, Tradability 77, Holdings not scored, Durability 56. SNAG: Cost 70, Risk 50, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings not scored, Durability 41.
Pillar letters and Scores for COTG, SNAG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCOTGSNAG
Cost30% weightB61A70Higher
Mission25% weightA95Not scored
Risk15% weightA86HigherC50
Tradability15% weightA77HigherC45
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB56HigherC41

Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. COTG and SNAG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Long Leveraged⁠

Category · 312 funds
See all 312 ›

COTG ranks 3rd and SNAG 124th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.

  1. Rank 1AUNHGLeverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETFScore 74
  2. Rank 2ATSMGLeverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETFScore 73
  3. Rank 3ACOTGLeverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 3AOKTGLeverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETFScore 70
  5. Rank 124CSMTGLeverage Shares 2X Long SMTC Daily ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 124CSNAGLeverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 124CSNDCCorgi SNDK 2x Daily ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

COTGALeverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF

SNAGCLeverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF

In short

COTG Most single-stock leverage chases chips and crypto. COTG points it at a warehouse club, aiming to deliver 200% of Costco's daily move before fees, and resetting the clock every session.

SNAG No data

Stated mandate

COTG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation stock, before fees and expenses.

SNAG No data

Why people hold it

  • COTG A plain mandate, plainly stated: 200% of Costco's daily move, before fees and expenses. No index to second-guess, no stock-picking layered on top.leverageshares.com
  • Costs less than the typical fund in the 2x single-stock crowd, and there's no temporary waiver holding that number down.
  • It has tracked its 2x daily target closely since its 2025 launch, putting it among the stronger implementations in a crowded peer group.

SNAG No data

Worth knowing

  • COTG Daily reset. Hold past one session and compounding takes over, so multi-week results can drift well away from 2x Costco. The issuer frames it as a tactical, often single-day tool.leverageshares.com
  • One stock, doubled. A single earnings print lands twice as hard on the day, with no second holding to cushion it.
  • Not one of the category's most heavily traded names, so the spread and the order type are worth a look.

SNAG No data

Full COTG profile⁠

Full SNAG profile⁠

COTG vs SNAG Holdings

How COTG and SNAG differ

Overlap by weight

9.7%

Shared holdings make up 12.4% of COTG and 9.7% of SNAG.

About this figure: COTG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.

SNAG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.

Level by level

  • Holdings1 in both9.7%
  • Asset classStocks100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for COTG and SNAG.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in COTG and SNAG, widest gap first
CountryMore in COTGMore in SNAGGap
United StatesSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • COTG212.3%
  • SNAG209.7%

Securities held

  • COTG1
  • SNAG1

Asset class

COTG
Stocks
SNAG
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in COTG0
  • In both1
  • Only in SNAG0

Only in COTG

0 securities, 0.0% of COTG by weight

Only in SNAG

0 securities, 0.0% of SNAG by weight

Weight gaps

All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in COTG and SNAG, widest gap first
HoldingMore in COTGMore in SNAGGap
First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040COTG +2.70 points

All 4 COTG holdings⁠All 5 SNAG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

COTG vs SNAG Cost

Overpaying COTG vs SNAG

$347

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • COTG 0.77%

    $14,829

  • SNAG 0.75%

    $14,482

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • COTG 0.77%
  • SNAG 0.75%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530COTG $14,829SNAG $14,482

Year by year

YearCOTGSNAGOverpaying
10$1,371$1,336$35
20$5,205$5,078$127
30$14,829$14,482$347

Expense ratio

  • 0.77%COTG
  • 0.75%SNAG, cheaper
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
  • Median 0.97%

SNAG 87th cheapest of 312 funds

COTG 135th cheapest of 312 funds

COTG vs SNAG Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
COTG None
SNAG None

Distribution history

COTGAll COTG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SNAGAll SNAG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

COTG vs SNAG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
COTG 38.3%since Oct 2025SNAG No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
COTG 0.12since Oct 2025SNAG No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
COTG −36.4%since Sep 2025SNAG No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
COTG −0.04SNAG 5.94

COTG and SNAG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • COTGAvsUNHGA

    Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SNAGCvsUNHGA

    Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • COTGAvsTSMGA

    Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SNAGCvsTSMGA

    Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • COTGAvsOKTGA

    Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SNAGCvsOKTGA

    Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.