TSMG ranks 2nd and SNAG 124th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
SNAG vs TSMG
9.7%by weight
SNAG −0.01pt a year
0.75%0.76%
TSMG 1.2×the volume
56.6K68.1K
SNAG vs TSMG Performance
−75.3%+27.7%
- SNAG 0.75%, better
- TSMG 0.76%
- SNAG $1M
- TSMG $24M
- SNAG
- TSMG +40.3%
- SNAG 5
- TSMG 6
- SNAG 56.6K sh
- TSMG 68.1K sh, better
- SNAG $4.13
- TSMG $28.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SNAG | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A70 |
| Mission | A75 | |
| Risk | C50 | A82Higher |
| Tradability | C45 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C41 | B66Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. SNAG and TSMG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SNAGC
TSMGA
In short
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SNAG vs TSMG Holdings
How SNAG and TSMG differ
9.7%
Shared holdings make up 11.0% of TSMG and 9.7% of SNAG.
About this figure: SNAG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
TSMG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Holdings9.7%
Sector
No Sector split for SNAG and TSMG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in SNAGMore in TSMG | Gap | SNAG | TSMG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- SNAG209.7%
- TSMG211.0%
- SNAG1
- TSMG2
Asset class
- SNAG
- Stocks
- TSMG
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in SNAG0
- In both1
- Only in TSMG1
Only in SNAG
0 securities, 0.0% of SNAG by weight
Only in TSMG
1 security, 10.1% of TSMG by weight
- 874039100 Swp10.06%
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in SNAGMore in TSMG | Gap | SNAG | TSMG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | TSMG +1.32 points | 9.66% | 10.98% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SNAG vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying TSMG vs SNAG
$174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SNAG 0.75%
$14,482
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SNAG | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,353 | $17 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $5,142 | $64 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $14,656 | $174 |
- 0.75%SNAG, cheaper
- 0.76%TSMG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
SNAG 87th cheapest of 312 funds
TSMG 131st cheapest of 312 funds
SNAG vs TSMG Dividends
- SNAG None
- TSMG
- SNAG
- TSMG $2.73
- SNAG
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- SNAG
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- SNAG
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
SNAG vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SNAG TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- SNAG TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- SNAG TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- SNAG 5.94TSMG 3.98
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.