PANG ranks 3rd and COTG 5th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
COTG vs PANG
PANG −0.01pt a year
0.77%0.76%
COTG 2.2×the volume
98.8K44.6K
COTG vs PANG Performance
+13.5%+76.3%
- COTG 0.77%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- COTG $10M
- PANG $9M
- COTG +13.5%
- PANG +76.3%, better
- COTG 4
- PANG 4
- COTG 98.8K sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- COTG $14.21
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COTG | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A91 | A94Higher |
| Risk | A85Higher | A74 |
| Tradability | A77Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B55 | B59Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. COTG and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COTGB
PANGA
In short
COTG Most single-stock leverage chases chips and crypto. COTG points it at a warehouse club, aiming to deliver 200% of Costco's daily move before fees, and resetting the clock every session.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
COTG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation stock, before fees and expenses.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COTG vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COTG vs PANG Cost
Overpaying COTG vs PANG
$173
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COTG 0.77%
$14,829
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COTG | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,371 | $1,353 | $18 |
| 20 | $5,205 | $5,142 | $63 |
| 30 | $14,829 | $14,656 | $173 |
- 0.77%COTG
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
COTG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
COTG vs PANG Dividends
- COTG None
- PANG
- COTG
- PANG $1.30
- COTG
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- COTG
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- COTG
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
COTG vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COTG 38.3%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- COTG 0.12PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- COTG −36.4%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- COTG −0.04PANG 3.32
COTG and PANG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
