VONV ranks 1st and COWS 45th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
COWS vs VONV
VONV −0.13pt a year
0.19%0.06%
VONV 97.7×the volume
7.94K776K
VONV +0.2pt
+23.0%+23.2%
COWS vs VONV Performance
+30.5%+30.6%
- COWS 0.19%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- COWS $45M
- VONV $21.7B
- COWS +30.5%
- VONV +30.6%, better
- COWS 1.27%
- VONV 1.51%, better
- COWS 42
- VONV 887
- COWS 7.94K sh
- VONV 776K sh, better
- COWS $40.26
- VONV $112.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COWS | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A71 | A96Higher |
| Mission | B69 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C50 | A89Higher |
| Tradability | C47 | B59Higher |
| Holdings | D36 | C49Higher |
| Durability | F13 | A92Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. COWS and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COWSB
VONVA
In short
COWS Lots of funds hunt cash cows. COWS wants proof: positive forward and trailing free cash flow yield, plus three straight years of dividend growth. Monthly payouts, 0.19% net of a waiver through January 28, 2027.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
COWS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and monthly income by generally tracking the Kelly US Cash Flow Dividend Leaders Index.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COWS vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COWS vs VONV Cost
Overpaying COWS vs VONV
$2,682
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COWS 0.19%
$3,952
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COWS | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $110 | $237 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $432 | $919 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $1,270 | $2,682 |
- 0.19%COWS
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
COWS 26th cheapest of 99 funds
COWS vs VONV Dividends
- COWS 1.27%
- VONV 1.51%, better
- COWS $0.52
- VONV $1.74
- COWS $0.05
- VONV $0.42
- COWS Oct 29, 2026
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- COWS Oct 30, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- COWS Monthly
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
COWS vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COWS 17.8%VONV 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- COWS 1.01VONV 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- COWS −24.8%VONV −18.9%
- Market sensitivity
- COWS 0.88VONV 0.85
COWS and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

