IUSV ranks 3rd and COWZ 28th of 40 funds in the US Value Index Category.
COWZ vs IUSV
IUSV −0.45pt a year
0.49%0.04%
COWZ 1.7×the volume
987K575K
COWZ +0.3pt
+11.8%+11.5%
COWZ vs IUSV Performance
+74.8%+72.6%
- COWZ 0.49%
- IUSV 0.04%, better
- COWZ $19.8B
- IUSV $28.5B
- COWZ +25.8%, better
- IUSV +16.6%
- COWZ 1.91%, better
- IUSV 1.63%
- COWZ 102
- IUSV 734
- COWZ 987K sh, better
- IUSV 575K sh
- COWZ $71.33
- IUSV $115.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COWZ | IUSV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F18 | A96Higher |
| Mission | B69 | A88Higher |
| Risk | C44 | B64Higher |
| Tradability | A87Higher | A82 |
| Holdings | C45 | C48Higher |
| Durability | C54 | A79Higher |
Rank among US Value Index funds
Same Category. COWZ and IUSV are both graded against the same 40 US Value Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COWZC
IUSVA
In short
COWZ Value measured in cash, not accounting bargains. COWZ ranks Russell 1000 large and mid caps by trailing free-cash-flow yield and holds the top 100, with financial companies screened out entirely.
IUSV A value fund with a wider net: it tracks the S&P 900 Value Index, which screens S&P 500 and MidCap 400 stocks on book value, earnings and sales versus price. Roughly 700 names, 0.04% a year, running since 2000.
Stated mandate
COWZ The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Its rules-based index targets 100 U.S. large- and mid-cap companies selected from the Russell 1000 for high trailing free-cash-flow yield after screens for projected cash flow, earnings, and financial companies.
IUSV The fund seeks to track the S&P 900 Value Index, which represents large- and mid-capitalization U.S. value equities. Value characteristics are identified using book value, earnings, and sales relative to price.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COWZ vs IUSV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COWZ vs IUSV Cost
Overpaying COWZ vs IUSV
$8,943
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COWZ 0.49%
$9,792
IUSV 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COWZ | IUSV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $73 | $810 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $288 | $3,106 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $849 | $8,943 |
- 0.49%COWZ
- 0.04%IUSV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Value Index funds
- Median 0.20%
IUSV 3rd cheapest of 40 funds
COWZ 32nd cheapest of 40 funds
COWZ vs IUSV Dividends
- COWZ 1.91%, better
- IUSV 1.63%
- COWZ $1.36
- IUSV $1.89
- COWZ $0.43
- IUSV $0.49
- COWZ Sep 3, 2026
- IUSV Sep 15, 2026
- COWZ Sep 8, 2026
- IUSV Sep 18, 2026
- COWZ Quarterly
- IUSV Quarterly
Distribution history
COWZ vs IUSV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- COWZ
- IUSV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COWZ 14.7%IUSV 11.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- COWZ 0.82IUSV 1.15, better
- Worst fall
- COWZ −22.0%IUSV −17.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- COWZ 0.74IUSV 0.85
COWZ and IUSV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
