IWD ranks 4th and COWZ 28th of 40 funds in the US Value Index Category.
COWZ vs IWD
IWD −0.31pt a year
0.49%0.18%
IWD 2.0×the volume
987K2.01M
COWZ +0.2pt
+11.8%+11.6%
COWZ vs IWD Performance
+74.8%+72.9%
- COWZ 0.49%
- IWD 0.18%, better
- COWZ $19.8B
- IWD $83.2B
- COWZ +25.8%
- IWD +28.4%, better
- COWZ 1.91%, better
- IWD 1.37%
- COWZ 102
- IWD 874
- COWZ 987K sh
- IWD 2.01M sh, better
- COWZ $71.33
- IWD $258.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COWZ | IWD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F18 | B59Higher |
| Mission | B69 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C44 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | A87 | A96Higher |
| Holdings | C45Higher | C42 |
| Durability | C54 | A82Higher |
Rank among US Value Index funds
Same Category. COWZ and IWD are both graded against the same 40 US Value Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COWZC
IWDA
In short
COWZ Value measured in cash, not accounting bargains. COWZ ranks Russell 1000 large and mid caps by trailing free-cash-flow yield and holds the top 100, with financial companies screened out entirely.
IWD The original Russell 1000 Value tracker, live since 2000 and still one of the most traded ways to own the value half of US large caps. Roughly 900 stocks, followed closely, at a price that reflects the plumbing.
Stated mandate
COWZ The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Its rules-based index targets 100 U.S. large- and mid-cap companies selected from the Russell 1000 for high trailing free-cash-flow yield after screens for projected cash flow, earnings, and financial companies.
IWD The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks that may be undervalued relative to comparable companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COWZ vs IWD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COWZ vs IWD Cost
Overpaying COWZ vs IWD
$6,043
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COWZ 0.49%
$9,792
IWD 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COWZ | IWD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $328 | $555 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $1,281 | $2,113 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $3,749 | $6,043 |
- 0.49%COWZ
- 0.18%IWD, cheaper
- Middle half of US Value Index funds
- Median 0.20%
IWD 16th cheapest of 40 funds
COWZ 32nd cheapest of 40 funds
COWZ vs IWD Dividends
- COWZ 1.91%, better
- IWD 1.37%
- COWZ $1.36
- IWD $3.53
- COWZ $0.43
- IWD $0.93
- COWZ Sep 3, 2026
- IWD Sep 15, 2026
- COWZ Sep 8, 2026
- IWD Sep 18, 2026
- COWZ Quarterly
- IWD Quarterly
Distribution history
COWZ vs IWD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- COWZ
- IWD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COWZ 14.7%IWD 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- COWZ 0.82IWD 1.42, better
- Worst fall
- COWZ −22.0%IWD −19.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- COWZ 0.74IWD 0.85
COWZ and IWD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





