Skip to content

CPNS vs FLJJ

Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF – September

CPNSANYSE Arca

AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF

FLJJBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

CPNS −0.05pt a year

CPNS0.69%FLJJ0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

CPNS 12.2×the volume

CPNS6.93KFLJJ567

CPNS vs FLJJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+4.5%CPNS+8.7%FLJJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CPNS +4.5%. FLJJ +8.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CPNS 0.69%, better
FLJJ 0.74%
Fund size
CPNS $28M
FLJJ $9M
1Y total return
CPNS +4.5%
FLJJ +8.7%, better
Holdings
CPNS 3
FLJJ 2
Avg volume (30D)
CPNS 6.93K sh, better
FLJJ 567 sh
NAV per share
CPNS $28.44
FLJJ $34.62
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CPNS: Cost 78, Risk 75, Mission 91, Tradability 59, Holdings not scored, Durability 60. FLJJ: Cost 54, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 37, Durability 53.
Pillar letters and Scores for CPNS, FLJJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCPNSFLJJ
Cost30% weightA78HigherC54
Mission25% weightA91Not scored
Risk15% weightA75A76Higher
Tradability15% weightB59HigherC50
Holdings10% weightNot scoredD37
Durability5% weightB60HigherC53

Rank among Other Floor Protected funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CPNS and FLJJ are both graded against the same 18 Other Floor Protected funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Other Floor Protected⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

CPNS ranks 4th and FLJJ 9th of 18 funds in the Other Floor Protected Category.

  1. Rank 1ACPRYCalamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – JanuaryScore 78
  2. Rank 2ACPROCalamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – OctoberScore 76
  3. Rank 3AISWNAmplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (International)Score 74
  4. Rank 4ACPNSCalamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF – SeptemberScore 71
  5. Rank 4ACPRJCalamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – JulyScore 71
  6. Rank 7BXIJNFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - JuneScore 64
  7. Rank 9BFLJJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETFScore 58
  8. Rank 10CFLAOAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Floor5 Apr/Oct ETFScore 51

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CPNSACalamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF – September

FLJJBAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF

In short

CPNS Armor, not a cushion. CPNS uses options on the Nasdaq-100 to target 100% protection from losses over a one-year outcome period, before fees, and pays for that shield with a hard cap on the upside that resets every September.

FLJJ Most protected-outcome funds absorb your first 5% of losses. This one draws the line at 5% instead: FLEX options on the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, downside limited beyond 5%, upside capped, terms reset every six months.

Stated mandate

CPNS Seeks to provide positive price-return participation in the Nasdaq-100 up to a predetermined cap while protecting 100% of losses over the one-year outcome period, before fees and expenses.

FLJJ The Fund uses FLEX Options referencing the SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust to seek matching returns through an outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against losses beyond 5%.

Why people hold it

  • CPNS The whole design in one line: participate in Nasdaq-100 price gains up to a preset cap while aiming to protect 100% of losses over the one-year outcome period, before fees and expenses.calamos.com
  • Fee is 0.69% a year, below the median for Nasdaq-100 buffer and protection funds. In a strategy where the option budget sets your cap, a lower fee leaves more to spend on upside.
  • September is one vintage in a quarterly series (CPNM March, CPNJ June), so investors can stagger entry points instead of betting everything on one reset date.
  • Among the dozen-odd Nasdaq-100 protection and buffer funds we track, this one sits in the upper tier on cost and risk build quality.
  • FLJJ Floor, not buffer. The option package is built so losses past 5% don't reach you over the outcome period, instead of soaking up only the first slice of a drop.
  • Six-month outcome periods reset each January and July, so the terms get repriced twice a year rather than locked in for a full twelve months.
  • At 0.74%, it runs below the median fee in its protected-outcome group and under Innovator's SFLR at 0.89%, though the Calamos CPRJ/CPRY line sits at 0.69%.
  • Among the floor-style funds tracked here, this one lands in the upper half of the group on build quality and cost.

Worth knowing

  • CPNS The cap is the price of the armor. It is set at the start of each outcome period and changes with market conditions, and the stated outcomes assume holding from one reset date to the next.
  • It tracks Nasdaq-100 price return, so index dividends are not part of the deal, and the fund has not been a distribution payer.
  • A small, thinly traded fund since its 2024 launch, so bid-ask spreads and order size deserve attention at the point of trade.
  • FLJJ The cap is set by option pricing when each period begins, so the next one is not knowable ahead of time.
  • Small and lightly traded, so spreads can run wider than in mainstream index ETFs. Limit orders are the sane way in and out.
  • Floor and cap are engineered for a period held start to finish. Step in mid-period and your effective protection and upside differ from the headline terms.

Full CPNS profile⁠

Full FLJJ profile⁠

CPNS vs FLJJ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CPNS vs FLJJ Cost

Overpaying FLJJ vs CPNS

$878

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CPNS 0.69%

    $13,429

  • FLJJ 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CPNS 0.69%
  • FLJJ 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530FLJJ $14,307CPNS $13,429

Year by year

YearCPNSFLJJOverpaying
10$1,232$1,319$87
20$4,697$5,015$318
30$13,429$14,307$878

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%CPNS, cheaper
  • 0.74%FLJJ
  • Middle half of Other Floor Protected funds
  • Median 0.79%

CPNS 2nd cheapest of 18 funds

FLJJ 8th cheapest of 18 funds

CPNS vs FLJJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
CPNS None
FLJJ None

Distribution history

CPNSAll CPNS payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FLJJAll FLJJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CPNS vs FLJJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CPNS 2.9%since Oct 2024FLJJ 6.0%since Mar 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CPNS 0.67since Oct 2024FLJJ 1.09since Mar 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CPNS −4.0%since Sep 2024FLJJ −6.9%since Feb 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CPNS 0.21FLJJ 0.48

Popular comparisons

  • CPNSAvsCPRYA

    Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF – September · Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – January

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLJJBvsCPRYA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF · Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – January

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CPNSAvsCPROA

    Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF – September · Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – October

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLJJBvsCPROA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF · Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – October

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CPNSAvsISWNA

    Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF – September · Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (International)

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLJJBvsISWNA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF · Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (International)

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.