PANG ranks 3rd and CRMG 11th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
CRMG vs PANG
8.4%by weight
PANG −0.02pt a year
0.78%0.76%
CRMG 70.5×the volume
3.15M44.6K
CRMG vs PANG Performance
−44.4%+91.6%
- CRMG 0.78%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- CRMG $37M
- PANG $9M
- CRMG −44.4%
- PANG +91.6%, better
- CRMG 5
- PANG 4
- CRMG 3.15M sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- CRMG $7.63
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CRMG | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A80 | A94Higher |
| Risk | B59 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | A93Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B65Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. CRMG and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CRMGB
PANGA
In short
CRMG A 2x daily Salesforce trade you can buy like any share. Leverage Shares prices it at 0.75%, under the 0.96% the big-name 2x single-stock funds charge, and the leverage resets every trading day.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
CRMG The Fund seeks pre-expense daily returns equal to twice the daily percentage change in Salesforce, Inc. common stock. It is not designed to pursue that objective over periods other than a single trading day.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CRMG vs PANG Holdings
How CRMG and PANG differ
8.4%
Shared holdings make up 11.5% of CRMG and 8.4% of PANG.
Level by level
- Holdings8.4%
Sector
No Sector split for CRMG and PANG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CRMGMore in PANG | CRMG | PANG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- CRMG211.4%
- PANG208.4%
- CRMG1
- PANG1
Asset class
- CRMG
- Equity
- PANG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in CRMG0
- In both1
- Only in PANG0
Only in CRMG
0 securities, 0.0% of CRMG by weight
Only in PANG
0 securities, 0.0% of PANG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in CRMGMore in PANG | CRMG | PANG |
|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | CRMG +3.02 points | 11.45% | 8.43% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CRMG vs PANG Cost
Overpaying CRMG vs PANG
$346
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CRMG 0.78%
$15,002
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CRMG | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,388 | $1,353 | $35 |
| 20 | $5,268 | $5,142 | $126 |
| 30 | $15,002 | $14,656 | $346 |
- 0.78%CRMG
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
CRMG 142nd cheapest of 315 funds
CRMG vs PANG Dividends
- CRMG None
- PANG
- CRMG
- PANG $1.30
- CRMG
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- CRMG
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- CRMG
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
CRMG vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CRMG 101.1%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- CRMG −0.11PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- CRMG −79.8%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- CRMG 0.43PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.78% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.