UNHG ranks 2nd and CRMX 298th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
CRMX vs UNHG
UNHG −0.72pt a year
1.49%0.77%
UNHG 13.3×the volume
54.6K726K
CRMX vs UNHG Performance
+14.4%−8.1%
- CRMX 1.49%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- CRMX $6M
- UNHG $63M
- CRMX
- UNHG +11.9%
- CRMX 2
- UNHG 5
- CRMX 54.6K sh
- UNHG 726K sh, better
- CRMX $16.45
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CRMX | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | B60Higher |
| Mission | B64 | A90Higher |
| Risk | D26 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | D34 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C51 | B66Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. CRMX and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CRMXF
UNHGA
In short
CRMX A one-session tool, not a holding: CRMX aims to deliver two times the daily move of Critical Metals Corp stock, up or down. One company, doubled, with the leverage reset every trading day.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
CRMX The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the daily performance of Critical Metals Corp. common shares. It is designed for a one-trading-day investment objective.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CRMX vs UNHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CRMX vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying CRMX vs UNHG
$11,312
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CRMX 1.49%
$26,141
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CRMX | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,574 | $1,371 | $1,203 |
| 20 | $9,464 | $5,205 | $4,259 |
| 30 | $26,141 | $14,829 | $11,312 |
- 1.49%CRMX
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
CRMX 263rd cheapest of 315 funds
CRMX vs UNHG Dividends
- CRMX None
- UNHG
- CRMX
- UNHG $1.90
- CRMX
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- CRMX
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- CRMX
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
CRMX vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CRMX UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- CRMX UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- CRMX UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- CRMX 9.23UNHG 5.53
Popular comparisons
- 1.49% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.