Skip to content
etf.net

CRMX vs TSMG

Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF

CRMXFCboe

Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

TSMGANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

TSMG −0.73pt a year

CRMX1.49%TSMG0.76%

Avg volume · 30D

TSMG 1.3×the volume

CRMX54.6KTSMG69K

CRMX vs TSMG Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+14.4%CRMX−4.6%TSMG

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CRMX +14.4%. TSMG −4.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.50%75%100%125%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CRMX 1.49%
TSMG 0.76%, better
Fund size
CRMX $6M
TSMG $28M
1Y total return
CRMX No data
TSMG +40.8%
Holdings
CRMX 2
TSMG 5
Avg volume (30D)
CRMX 54.6K sh
TSMG 69K sh, better
NAV per share
CRMX $16.45
TSMG $33.77
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CRMX: Cost 11, Risk 26, Mission 64, Tradability 34, Holdings not scored, Durability 51. TSMG: Cost 70, Risk 84, Mission 79, Tradability 74, Holdings not scored, Durability 67.
Pillar letters and Scores for CRMX, TSMG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCRMXTSMG
Cost30% weightF11A70Higher
Mission25% weightB64A79Higher
Risk15% weightD26A84Higher
Tradability15% weightD34A74Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightC51B67Higher

Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CRMX and TSMG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Long Leveraged⁠

Category · 315 funds
See all 315 ›

TSMG ranks 1st and CRMX 298th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.

  1. Rank 1ATSMGLeverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETFScore 73
  2. Rank 2AUNHGLeverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETFScore 72
  3. Rank 298FAXTUT-REX 2X Long AXTI Daily Target ETFScore 23
  4. Rank 298FCRMXTradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETFScore 23
  5. Rank 298FGLXUT-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETFScore 23

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CRMXFTradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF

TSMGALeverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

In short

CRMX A one-session tool, not a holding: CRMX aims to deliver two times the daily move of Critical Metals Corp stock, up or down. One company, doubled, with the leverage reset every trading day.

TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.

Stated mandate

CRMX The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the daily performance of Critical Metals Corp. common shares. It is designed for a one-trading-day investment objective.

TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • CRMX No guesswork about the exposure: two times the daily move of Critical Metals Corp shares, written into the fund's own stated objective.
  • Leverage inside a normal brokerage ticket. It's a registered 1940 Act fund, so no margin account or borrowing on your end.
  • Geared access to a stock the leveraged shelf mostly skips. The top-graded names in this cohort cluster in mega-cap tech (AAPU, GGLL).
  • TSMG Charges 0.75% a year, undercutting the 0.96% on Direxion's 2x single-stock funds such as AAPU and GGLL.leverageshares.com
  • The milder gear on the leveraged shelf: it targets double TSM's daily move, not triple.leverageshares.com
  • Leverage arrives inside a regular 1940 Act ETF. No margin agreement, no lender, and your exposure is capped at what you put in.leverageshares.com
  • Hits its stated daily target tightly, and rates among the stronger builds in a crowded field of 2x and 3x single-stock funds.

Worth knowing

  • CRMX The fee runs high for the category: 1.49% a year, while the other 2x CRML fund, CRMU, charges less than half that.
  • The 2x target resets each day. Hold longer and compounding takes over, so multi-day results can land far from twice the stock's move for the stretch.
  • Young and small: launched in 2026, a modest asset base and moderate volume, so spreads and order size carry more weight than with the big leveraged names.
  • TSMG The leverage resets every day. Hold longer and compounding takes over, so multi-day results can drift well away from twice TSM's move, especially in choppy markets.leverageshares.com
  • One stock, one industry. Everything rides on Taiwan Semiconductor, doubled, so company-specific news lands twice as hard.
  • Young and small: launched in January 2025, and it sits among the smaller, less heavily traded names on the leveraged shelf, which can widen spreads.

Full CRMX profile⁠

Full TSMG profile⁠

CRMX vs TSMG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CRMX vs TSMG Cost

Overpaying CRMX vs TSMG

$11,485

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CRMX 1.49%

    $26,141

  • TSMG 0.76%

    $14,656

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CRMX 1.49%
  • TSMG 0.76%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530CRMX $26,141TSMG $14,656

Year by year

YearCRMXTSMGOverpaying
10$2,574$1,353$1,221
20$9,464$5,142$4,322
30$26,141$14,656$11,485

Expense ratio

  • 1.49%CRMX
  • 0.76%TSMG, cheaper
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
  • Median 0.97%

TSMG 131st cheapest of 315 funds

CRMX 263rd cheapest of 315 funds

CRMX vs TSMG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
CRMX None
TSMG No data
Last payment
CRMX No data
TSMG $2.73
Ex-dividend
CRMX No data
TSMG Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
CRMX No data
TSMG Jan 2, 2026
Frequency
CRMX No data
TSMG Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

CRMXAll CRMX payments⁠

No distribution history available.

TSMGIrregular · 1 paymentAll TSMG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $2.73. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502026YTD

CRMX vs TSMG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CRMX No dataTSMG 77.9%since Feb 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CRMX No dataTSMG 0.97since Feb 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CRMX No dataTSMG −63.7%since Jan 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CRMX 9.23TSMG 3.81

Popular comparisons

  • CRMXFvsUNHGA

    Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.49% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TSMGAvsUNHGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CRMXFvsOKTGA

    Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.49% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TSMGAvsOKTGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CRMXFvsPANGA

    Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.49% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TSMGAvsPANGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.