Skip to content

CRMX vs PANG

Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF

CRMXFCboe

Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF

PANGANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

PANG −0.73pt a year

CRMX1.49%PANG0.76%

Avg volume · 30D

CRMX 1.2×the volume

CRMX54.6KPANG44.6K

CRMX vs PANG Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

+0.8%CRMX−1.5%PANG

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. CRMX +0.8%. PANG −1.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.25%50%75%100%125%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CRMX 1.49%
PANG 0.76%, better
Fund size
CRMX $5M
PANG $9M
1Y total return
CRMX No data
PANG +76.3%
Holdings
CRMX 2
PANG 4
Avg volume (30D)
CRMX 54.6K sh, better
PANG 44.6K sh
NAV per share
CRMX $14.67
PANG $31.31
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CRMX: Cost 11, Risk 26, Mission 64, Tradability 34, Holdings not scored, Durability 51. PANG: Cost 70, Risk 74, Mission 94, Tradability 74, Holdings not scored, Durability 59.
Pillar letters and Scores for CRMX, PANG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCRMXPANG
Cost30% weightF11A70Higher
Mission25% weightB64A94Higher
Risk15% weightD26A74Higher
Tradability15% weightD34A74Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightC51B59Higher

Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CRMX and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Long Leveraged⁠

Category · 315 funds
See all 315 ›

PANG ranks 3rd and CRMX 298th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.

  1. Rank 1ATSMGLeverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETFScore 73
  2. Rank 2AUNHGLeverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETFScore 72
  3. Rank 3AOKTGLeverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 3APANGLeverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETFScore 70
  5. Rank 5BAMDGLeverage Shares 2x Long AMD Daily ETFScore 69
  6. Rank 298FAXTUT-REX 2X Long AXTI Daily Target ETFScore 23
  7. Rank 298FCRMXTradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETFScore 23
  8. Rank 298FGLXUT-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETFScore 23

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CRMXFTradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF

PANGALeverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF

In short

CRMX A one-session tool, not a holding: CRMX aims to deliver two times the daily move of Critical Metals Corp stock, up or down. One company, doubled, with the leverage reset every trading day.

PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.

Stated mandate

CRMX The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the daily performance of Critical Metals Corp. common shares. It is designed for a one-trading-day investment objective.

PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.

Why people hold it

  • CRMX No guesswork about the exposure: two times the daily move of Critical Metals Corp shares, written into the fund's own stated objective.
  • Leverage inside a normal brokerage ticket. It's a registered 1940 Act fund, so no margin account or borrowing on your end.
  • Geared access to a stock the leveraged shelf mostly skips. The top-graded names in this cohort cluster in mega-cap tech (AAPU, GGLL).
  • PANG Cheaper of the two 2x PANW funds: 0.76% flat versus 1.08% for PALU, and PALU's number is net of a waiver through September 1, 2027 (1.48% gross).direxion.com
  • That 0.76% also sits below the typical fee in the single-stock leveraged category, where costs usually run higher.
  • Hits its 200% daily target closely, one of the tighter implementations among hundreds of single-stock leveraged funds.
  • Leverage arrives inside a standard 1940 Act ETF: no margin agreement, no borrowing, no overnight position to roll yourself.leverageshares.com

Worth knowing

  • CRMX The fee runs high for the category: 1.49% a year, while the other 2x CRML fund, CRMU, charges less than half that.
  • The 2x target resets each day. Hold longer and compounding takes over, so multi-day results can land far from twice the stock's move for the stretch.
  • Young and small: launched in 2026, a modest asset base and moderate volume, so spreads and order size carry more weight than with the big leveraged names.
  • PANG Daily reset, not a 2x hold. Over weeks the returns compound, and a choppy stretch in PANW can leave the result far from double the move.leverageshares.com
  • One stock, twice the swing. An earnings miss or a cyber headline lands here with double the force, up or down.leverageshares.com
  • Smaller and more lightly traded than the giants of the category, so spreads can widen; limit orders earn their keep.

Full CRMX profile⁠

Full PANG profile⁠

CRMX vs PANG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CRMX vs PANG Cost

Overpaying CRMX vs PANG

$11,485

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CRMX 1.49%

    $26,141

  • PANG 0.76%

    $14,656

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CRMX 1.49%
  • PANG 0.76%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530CRMX $26,141PANG $14,656

Year by year

YearCRMXPANGOverpaying
10$2,574$1,353$1,221
20$9,464$5,142$4,322
30$26,141$14,656$11,485

Expense ratio

  • 1.49%CRMX
  • 0.76%PANG, cheaper
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
  • Median 0.97%

PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds

CRMX 263rd cheapest of 315 funds

CRMX vs PANG Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
CRMX None
PANG No data
Last payment
CRMX No data
PANG $1.30
Ex-dividend
CRMX No data
PANG Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
CRMX No data
PANG Jan 2, 2026
Frequency
CRMX No data
PANG Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

CRMXAll CRMX payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PANGIrregular · 1 paymentAll PANG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $1.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12026YTD

CRMX vs PANG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CRMX No dataPANG 128.2%since Apr 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CRMX No dataPANG 0.90since Apr 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CRMX No dataPANG −62.4%since Mar 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CRMX 9.23PANG 3.32

Popular comparisons

  • CRMXFvsTSMGA

    Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.49% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PANGAvsTSMGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CRMXFvsUNHGA

    Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.49% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PANGAvsUNHGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CRMXFvsOKTGA

    Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.49% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PANGAvsOKTGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.