PANG ranks 3rd and CRMX 298th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
CRMX vs PANG
PANG −0.73pt a year
1.49%0.76%
CRMX 1.2×the volume
54.6K44.6K
CRMX vs PANG Performance
+0.8%−1.5%
- CRMX 1.49%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- CRMX $5M
- PANG $9M
- CRMX
- PANG +76.3%
- CRMX 2
- PANG 4
- CRMX 54.6K sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- CRMX $14.67
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CRMX | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A70Higher |
| Mission | B64 | A94Higher |
| Risk | D26 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | D34 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C51 | B59Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. CRMX and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CRMXF
PANGA
In short
CRMX A one-session tool, not a holding: CRMX aims to deliver two times the daily move of Critical Metals Corp stock, up or down. One company, doubled, with the leverage reset every trading day.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
CRMX The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the daily performance of Critical Metals Corp. common shares. It is designed for a one-trading-day investment objective.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CRMX vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CRMX vs PANG Cost
Overpaying CRMX vs PANG
$11,485
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CRMX 1.49%
$26,141
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CRMX | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,574 | $1,353 | $1,221 |
| 20 | $9,464 | $5,142 | $4,322 |
| 30 | $26,141 | $14,656 | $11,485 |
- 1.49%CRMX
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
CRMX 263rd cheapest of 315 funds
CRMX vs PANG Dividends
- CRMX None
- PANG
- CRMX
- PANG $1.30
- CRMX
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- CRMX
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- CRMX
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
CRMX vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CRMX PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- CRMX PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- CRMX PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- CRMX 9.23PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.49% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.