PANG ranks 3rd and CRWG 37th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
CRWG vs PANG
PANG −0.01pt a year
0.77%0.76%
CRWG 76.8×the volume
3.43M44.6K
CRWG vs PANG Performance
−94.5%+91.6%
- CRWG 0.77%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- CRWG $97M
- PANG $9M
- CRWG −94.5%
- PANG +91.6%, better
- CRWG 6
- PANG 4
- CRWG 3.43M sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- CRWG $6.37
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CRWG | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A96Higher | A94 |
| Risk | D28 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | A91Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B67Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. CRWG and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CRWGB
PANGA
In short
CRWG A 2x daily play on CoreWeave, the GPU landlord of the AI buildout. CRWG resets its leverage every day, costs 0.77%, and trades more briskly than most single-stock leverage funds.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
CRWG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of CoreWeave, Inc. common stock, before fees and expenses.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CRWG vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CRWG vs PANG Cost
Overpaying CRWG vs PANG
$173
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CRWG 0.77%
$14,829
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CRWG | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,371 | $1,353 | $18 |
| 20 | $5,205 | $5,142 | $63 |
| 30 | $14,829 | $14,656 | $173 |
- 0.77%CRWG
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
CRWG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
CRWG vs PANG Dividends
- CRWG $2.00
- PANG $1.30
- CRWG Dec 30, 2025
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- CRWG Jan 2, 2026
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- CRWG Irregular
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
CRWG vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CRWG 171.2%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- CRWG −0.30PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- CRWG −96.5%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- CRWG 8.50PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.