TSMG ranks 1st and CRWG 37th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
CRWG vs TSMG
1.3%by weight
TSMG −0.01pt a year
0.77%0.76%
CRWG 49.7×the volume
3.43M69K
CRWG vs TSMG Performance
−94.5%+40.8%
- CRWG 0.77%
- TSMG 0.76%, better
- CRWG $97M
- TSMG $28M
- CRWG −94.5%
- TSMG +40.8%, better
- CRWG 6
- TSMG 5
- CRWG 3.43M sh, better
- TSMG 69K sh
- CRWG $6.37
- TSMG $33.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CRWG | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A96Higher | A79 |
| Risk | D28 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | A91Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B67 | B67 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. CRWG and TSMG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CRWGB
TSMGA
In short
CRWG A 2x daily play on CoreWeave, the GPU landlord of the AI buildout. CRWG resets its leverage every day, costs 0.77%, and trades more briskly than most single-stock leverage funds.
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
CRWG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of CoreWeave, Inc. common stock, before fees and expenses.
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CRWG vs TSMG Holdings
How CRWG and TSMG differ
1.3%
Shared holdings make up 12.4% of TSMG and 1.3% of CRWG.
Level by level
- Holdings1.3%
Sector
No Sector split for CRWG and TSMG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CRWGMore in TSMG | CRWG | TSMG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- CRWG201.3%
- TSMG212.4%
- CRWG1
- TSMG1
Asset class
- CRWG
- Equity
- TSMG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in CRWG0
- In both1
- Only in TSMG0
Only in CRWG
0 securities, 0.0% of CRWG by weight
Only in TSMG
0 securities, 0.0% of TSMG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in CRWGMore in TSMG | CRWG | TSMG |
|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | TSMG +11.14 points | 1.27% | 12.41% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CRWG vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying CRWG vs TSMG
$173
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CRWG 0.77%
$14,829
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CRWG | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,371 | $1,353 | $18 |
| 20 | $5,205 | $5,142 | $63 |
| 30 | $14,829 | $14,656 | $173 |
- 0.77%CRWG
- 0.76%TSMG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
TSMG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
CRWG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
CRWG vs TSMG Dividends
- CRWG $2.00
- TSMG $2.73
- CRWG Dec 30, 2025
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- CRWG Jan 2, 2026
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- CRWG Irregular
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
CRWG vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CRWG 171.2%TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- CRWG −0.30TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- CRWG −96.5%TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- CRWG 8.50TSMG 3.81
Popular comparisons
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.