PANG ranks 3rd and CRWU 283rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
CRWU vs PANG
PANG −0.74pt a year
1.50%0.76%
CRWU 10.0×the volume
445K44.6K
CRWU vs PANG Performance
−94.1%+91.6%
- CRWU 1.50%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- CRWU $22M
- PANG $9M
- CRWU −94.1%
- PANG +91.6%, better
- CRWU 2
- PANG 4
- CRWU 445K sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- CRWU $15.37
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CRWU | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | D28 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B66Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. CRWU and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CRWUD
PANGA
In short
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CRWU vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CRWU vs PANG Cost
Overpaying CRWU vs PANG
$11,627
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CRWU 1.50%
$26,283
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CRWU | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,590 | $1,353 | $1,237 |
| 20 | $9,519 | $5,142 | $4,377 |
| 30 | $26,283 | $14,656 | $11,627 |
- 1.50%CRWU
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
CRWU 271st cheapest of 315 funds
CRWU vs PANG Dividends
- CRWU $4.28
- PANG $1.30
- CRWU Dec 24, 2025
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- CRWU Dec 26, 2025
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- CRWU Irregular
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
CRWU vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CRWU 167.9%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- CRWU −0.40PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- CRWU −96.3%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- CRWU 8.42PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.50% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.