TSMG ranks 1st and CRWU 283rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
CRWU vs TSMG
TSMG −0.74pt a year
1.50%0.76%
CRWU 6.4×the volume
445K69K
CRWU vs TSMG Performance
−94.1%+40.8%
- CRWU 1.50%
- TSMG 0.76%, better
- CRWU $22M
- TSMG $28M
- CRWU −94.1%
- TSMG +40.8%, better
- CRWU 2
- TSMG 5
- CRWU 445K sh, better
- TSMG 69K sh
- CRWU $15.37
- TSMG $33.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CRWU | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A79 | |
| Risk | D28 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B66 | B67Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. CRWU and TSMG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CRWUD
TSMGA
In short
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CRWU vs TSMG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CRWU vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying CRWU vs TSMG
$11,627
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CRWU 1.50%
$26,283
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CRWU | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,590 | $1,353 | $1,237 |
| 20 | $9,519 | $5,142 | $4,377 |
| 30 | $26,283 | $14,656 | $11,627 |
- 1.50%CRWU
- 0.76%TSMG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
TSMG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
CRWU 271st cheapest of 315 funds
CRWU vs TSMG Dividends
- CRWU $4.28
- TSMG $2.73
- CRWU Dec 24, 2025
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- CRWU Dec 26, 2025
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- CRWU Irregular
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
CRWU vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CRWU 167.9%TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- CRWU −0.40TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- CRWU −96.3%TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- CRWU 8.42TSMG 3.81
Popular comparisons
- 1.50% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.