ILCV ranks 2nd and CSM 50th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
CSM vs ILCV
ILCV −0.41pt a year
0.45%0.04%
ILCV 5.0×the volume
4.87K24.4K
CSM +1.9pt
+14.2%+12.3%
CSM vs ILCV Performance
+72.0%+81.1%
- CSM 0.45%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- CSM $513M
- ILCV $1.37B
- CSM +11.3%
- ILCV +21.0%, better
- CSM 1.06%
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- CSM 303
- ILCV 375
- CSM 4.87K sh
- ILCV 24.4K sh, better
- CSM $86.42
- ILCV $109.27
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CSM | ILCV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D28 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A97Higher | A82 |
| Risk | C52 | A90Higher |
| Tradability | C45 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | C44Higher | D39 |
| Durability | B69 | A82Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. CSM and ILCV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CSMC
ILCVA
In short
CSM A survivor of the 2009 130/30 craze. CSM runs 130% long a four-factor screen of big U.S. companies and 30% short, so net exposure lands near the market while the factor tilts get turned up.
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
Stated mandate
CSM The Fund seeks pre-expense investment results that track the UBS 130/30 Index. It uses equity securities and derivatives to maintain exposure to a rules-based, multi-factor portfolio of leading large-cap U.S. companies with 130% long and 30% short exposure.
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CSM vs ILCV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CSM vs ILCV Cost
Overpaying CSM vs ILCV
$8,192
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CSM 0.45%
$9,041
ILCV 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CSM | ILCV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $73 | $739 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $288 | $2,840 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $849 | $8,192 |
- 0.45%CSM
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
CSM 71st cheapest of 99 funds
CSM vs ILCV Dividends
- CSM 1.06%
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- CSM $0.91
- ILCV $1.65
- CSM $0.21
- ILCV $0.42
- CSM Sep 23, 2026
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- CSM Sep 29, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- CSM Quarterly
- ILCV Quarterly
Distribution history
CSM vs ILCV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CSM
- ILCV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CSM 12.6%ILCV 10.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CSM 1.38ILCV 1.57, better
- Worst fall
- CSM −23.8%ILCV −18.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CSM 0.97ILCV 0.82
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.