Skip to content

CSM vs ILCV

ProShares Large Cap Core Plus

CSMCCboe

iShares Morningstar Value ETF

ILCVANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ILCV −0.41pt a year

CSM0.45%ILCV0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

ILCV 5.0×the volume

CSM4.87KILCV24.4K

10Y return · a year

CSM +1.9pt

CSM+14.2%ILCV+12.3%

CSM vs ILCV Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+72.0%CSM+81.1%ILCV

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. CSM +72.0%. ILCV +81.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CSM 0.45%
ILCV 0.04%, better
Fund size
CSM $513M
ILCV $1.37B
1Y total return
CSM +11.3%
ILCV +21.0%, better
Yield (12M)
CSM 1.06%
ILCV 1.51%, better
Holdings
CSM 303
ILCV 375
Avg volume (30D)
CSM 4.87K sh
ILCV 24.4K sh, better
NAV per share
CSM $86.42
ILCV $109.27
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CSM: Cost 28, Risk 52, Mission 97, Tradability 45, Holdings 44, Durability 69. ILCV: Cost 99, Risk 90, Mission 82, Tradability 64, Holdings 39, Durability 82.
Pillar letters and Scores for CSM, ILCV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCSMILCV
Cost30% weightD28A99Higher
Mission25% weightA97HigherA82
Risk15% weightC52A90Higher
Tradability15% weightC45B64Higher
Holdings10% weightC44HigherD39
Durability5% weightB69A82Higher

Rank among US Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CSM and ILCV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Multifactor⁠

Category · 99 funds
See all 99 ›

ILCV ranks 2nd and CSM 50th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AVONVVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AILCViShares Morningstar Value ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 2AVYMVanguard High Dividend Yield ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 48BFYXFirst Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX FundScore 56
  5. Rank 50CCSMProShares Large Cap Core PlusScore 55
  6. Rank 50BPSCPrincipal U.S. Small-Cap Multi-Factor ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CSMCProShares Large Cap Core Plus

ILCVAiShares Morningstar Value ETF

In short

CSM A survivor of the 2009 130/30 craze. CSM runs 130% long a four-factor screen of big U.S. companies and 30% short, so net exposure lands near the market while the factor tilts get turned up.

ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.

Stated mandate

CSM The Fund seeks pre-expense investment results that track the UBS 130/30 Index. It uses equity securities and derivatives to maintain exposure to a rules-based, multi-factor portfolio of leading large-cap U.S. companies with 130% long and 30% short exposure.

ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.

Why people hold it

  • CSM The shorting is the whole point: 130% long, 30% short. Net exposure sits near 100% of the market, but the factor bets carry more weight than a long-only screen allows.
  • Four factors in one rulebook (value, growth, momentum, profitability) spread across roughly 300 large U.S. companies, so no single style is steering the whole portfolio.proshares.com
  • Long-short mechanics inside an ordinary 1940 Act ETF: no lockups, no accreditation, no K-1. It tracks a published benchmark, the UBS 130/30 Index, rather than a manager's hunches.
  • Trading since 2009, which is a long run for a long-short strategy. Most of the 130/30 wave that launched alongside it did not last. Distributions come quarterly.
  • ILCV Charges 0.04% a year against a 0.32% median for its factor peer group. Undercuts well-regarded rivals like VONV (0.06%) and FNDX (0.25%).
  • Value gets defined five ways: forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow and dividend yield. Wider lens than a single price-to-book screen.ishares.com
  • Spreads the bet across about 400 large- and mid-cap names and distributes quarterly.
  • Trading since 2004 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, it ranks among the strongest implementations in its factor cohort.

Worth knowing

  • CSM 0.45% a year is toward the high end for large-cap multifactor. Plain-vanilla peers like VONV (0.06%) and IUSG (0.04%) cost a fraction, though neither shorts anything.
  • One of the lighter-traded funds in its category, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the volume leaders in large-cap factor land.
  • The short sleeve cuts both ways: it adds borrow and derivative costs, and it drags when the market's lowest-ranked names are the ones running.
  • ILCV One of the quieter tickers in its category. Thin volume means spreads matter more here than on a mega-cap index fund, and limit orders are the usual tool.
  • Value-only by design. It skips the market's priciest growth leaders, so it moves differently from a total-market fund in both directions.ishares.com
  • Large and mid caps only. Small-cap value sits outside the mandate.

Full CSM profile⁠

Full ILCV profile⁠

CSM vs ILCV Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CSM vs ILCV Cost

Overpaying CSM vs ILCV

$8,192

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CSM 0.45%

    $9,041

  • ILCV 0.04%

    $849

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CSM 0.45%
  • ILCV 0.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530CSM $9,041ILCV $849

Year by year

YearCSMILCVOverpaying
10$812$73$739
20$3,128$288$2,840
30$9,041$849$8,192

Expense ratio

  • 0.45%CSM
  • 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.29%

ILCV cheapest of 99 funds

CSM 71st cheapest of 99 funds

CSM vs ILCV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CSM 1.06%
ILCV 1.51%, better
Payout (12M)
CSM $0.91
ILCV $1.65
Last payment
CSM $0.21
ILCV $0.42
Ex-dividend
CSM Sep 23, 2026
ILCV Sep 15, 2026
Paid on
CSM Sep 29, 2026
ILCV Sep 18, 2026
Frequency
CSM Quarterly
ILCV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

CSMQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll CSM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.09; Jun 21, 2017 $0.09; Sep 27, 2017 $0.13; Dec 26, 2017 $0.11; Mar 21, 2018 $0.08; Jun 20, 2018 $0.11; Sep 26, 2018 $0.12; Dec 26, 2018 $0.15; Mar 20, 2019 $0.10; Jun 25, 2019 $0.15; Sep 25, 2019 $0.13; Dec 24, 2019 $0.16; Mar 25, 2020 $0.14; Jun 24, 2020 $0.12; Sep 23, 2020 $0.11; Dec 23, 2020 $0.14; Mar 23, 2021 $0.11; Jun 22, 2021 $0.10; Sep 22, 2021 $0.09; Dec 23, 2021 $0.14; Mar 23, 2022 $0.13; Jun 22, 2022 $0.14; Sep 21, 2022 $0.14; Dec 22, 2022 $0.20; Mar 22, 2023 $0.14; Jun 21, 2023 $0.15; Sep 20, 2023 $0.14; Dec 20, 2023 $0.21; Mar 20, 2024 $0.15; Jun 26, 2024 $0.17; Sep 25, 2024 $0.16; Dec 23, 2024 $0.22; Mar 26, 2025 $0.17; Jun 25, 2025 $0.20; Sep 24, 2025 $0.20; Dec 24, 2025 $0.26; Mar 25, 2026 $0.21; Jun 24, 2026 $0.23; Sep 23, 2026 $0.21. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
ILCVQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll ILCV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.28; Jun 27, 2017 $0.30; Sep 26, 2017 $0.31; Dec 19, 2017 $0.34; Mar 22, 2018 $0.33; Jun 26, 2018 $0.35; Sep 26, 2018 $0.34; Dec 17, 2018 $0.39; Mar 20, 2019 $0.35; Jun 17, 2019 $0.34; Sep 24, 2019 $0.44; Dec 16, 2019 $0.45; Mar 25, 2020 $0.44; Jun 15, 2020 $0.40; Sep 23, 2020 $0.41; Dec 14, 2020 $0.40; Mar 25, 2021 $0.36; Jun 10, 2021 $0.25; Sep 24, 2021 $0.39; Dec 13, 2021 $0.40; Mar 24, 2022 $0.33; Jun 9, 2022 $0.27; Sep 26, 2022 $0.47; Dec 13, 2022 $0.40; Mar 23, 2023 $0.36; Jun 7, 2023 $0.30; Sep 26, 2023 $0.45; Dec 20, 2023 $0.48; Mar 21, 2024 $0.35; Jun 11, 2024 $0.37; Sep 25, 2024 $0.46; Dec 17, 2024 $0.43; Mar 18, 2025 $0.38; Jun 16, 2025 $0.40; Sep 16, 2025 $0.40; Dec 16, 2025 $0.48; Mar 17, 2026 $0.36; Jun 15, 2026 $0.39; Sep 15, 2026 $0.42. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

CSM vs ILCV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • CSM
  • ILCV
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: CSM −23.8% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CSM 12.6%ILCV 10.7%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CSM 1.38ILCV 1.57, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CSM −23.8%ILCV −18.6%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CSM 0.97ILCV 0.82

Popular comparisons

  • CSMCvsVONVA

    ProShares Large Cap Core Plus · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ILCVAvsVONVA

    iShares Morningstar Value ETF · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CSMCvsVYMA

    ProShares Large Cap Core Plus · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ILCVAvsVYMA

    iShares Morningstar Value ETF · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CSMCvsIMCVA

    ProShares Large Cap Core Plus · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ILCVAvsIMCVA

    iShares Morningstar Value ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.