Skip to content

CSM vs VYM

ProShares Large Cap Core Plus

CSMCCboe

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

VYMANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

VYM −0.41pt a year

CSM0.45%VYM0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

VYM 234.6×the volume

CSM4.87KVYM1.14M

10Y return · a year

CSM +2.2pt

CSM+14.2%VYM+12.0%

CSM vs VYM Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+72.0%CSM+74.3%VYM

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. CSM +72.0%. VYM +74.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CSM 0.45%
VYM 0.04%, better
Fund size
CSM $513M
VYM $95.8B
1Y total return
CSM +11.3%
VYM +19.3%, better
Yield (12M)
CSM 1.06%
VYM 2.24%, better
Holdings
CSM 303
VYM 601
Avg volume (30D)
CSM 4.87K sh
VYM 1.14M sh, better
NAV per share
CSM $86.42
VYM $163.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CSM: Cost 28, Risk 52, Mission 97, Tradability 45, Holdings 44, Durability 69. VYM: Cost 99, Risk 84, Mission 79, Tradability 61, Holdings 53, Durability 95.
Pillar letters and Scores for CSM, VYM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCSMVYM
Cost30% weightD28A99Higher
Mission25% weightA97HigherA79
Risk15% weightC52A84Higher
Tradability15% weightC45B61Higher
Holdings10% weightC44C53Higher
Durability5% weightB69A95Higher

Rank among US Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CSM and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Multifactor⁠

Category · 99 funds
See all 99 ›

VYM ranks 2nd and CSM 50th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AVONVVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AILCViShares Morningstar Value ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 2AVYMVanguard High Dividend Yield ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AIMCViShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 48BFYXFirst Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX FundScore 56
  6. Rank 50CCSMProShares Large Cap Core PlusScore 55
  7. Rank 50BPSCPrincipal U.S. Small-Cap Multi-Factor ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CSMCProShares Large Cap Core Plus

VYMAVanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

In short

CSM A survivor of the 2009 130/30 craze. CSM runs 130% long a four-factor screen of big U.S. companies and 30% short, so net exposure lands near the market while the factor tilts get turned up.

VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.

Stated mandate

CSM The Fund seeks pre-expense investment results that track the UBS 130/30 Index. It uses equity securities and derivatives to maintain exposure to a rules-based, multi-factor portfolio of leading large-cap U.S. companies with 130% long and 30% short exposure.

VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.

Why people hold it

  • CSM The shorting is the whole point: 130% long, 30% short. Net exposure sits near 100% of the market, but the factor bets carry more weight than a long-only screen allows.
  • Four factors in one rulebook (value, growth, momentum, profitability) spread across roughly 300 large U.S. companies, so no single style is steering the whole portfolio.proshares.com
  • Long-short mechanics inside an ordinary 1940 Act ETF: no lockups, no accreditation, no K-1. It tracks a published benchmark, the UBS 130/30 Index, rather than a manager's hunches.
  • Trading since 2009, which is a long run for a long-short strategy. Most of the 130/30 wave that launched alongside it did not last. Distributions come quarterly.
  • VYM Four basis points a year, against a peer-group median near 0.32%. Cheaper than cohort neighbors VONV (0.06%) and FNDX (0.25%).
  • Running since 2006 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, so ordinary orders tend to fill at tight spreads.
  • Simple mandate: track the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index of US common stocks screened on yield. No manager discretion, no options overlay, plain 1940-Act fund.vanguard.com
  • Pays quarterly, and among 100-plus value and multifactor rivals it stands as one of the strongest overall packages in the group.

Worth knowing

  • CSM 0.45% a year is toward the high end for large-cap multifactor. Plain-vanilla peers like VONV (0.06%) and IUSG (0.04%) cost a fraction, though neither shorts anything.
  • One of the lighter-traded funds in its category, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the volume leaders in large-cap factor land.
  • The short sleeve cuts both ways: it adds borrow and derivative costs, and it drags when the market's lowest-ranked names are the ones running.
  • VYM The screen is yield, not payout growth or dividend quality, so a company can qualify simply because its share price fell.
  • This is a value slice by design, tilted to established payers, so it behaves differently from a total US market fund.
  • Roughly 600 holdings, but weight leans toward the largest payers, so the top of the roster does more of the work than the count suggests.

Full CSM profile⁠

Full VYM profile⁠

CSM vs VYM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CSM vs VYM Cost

Overpaying CSM vs VYM

$8,192

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CSM 0.45%

    $9,041

  • VYM 0.04%

    $849

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CSM 0.45%
  • VYM 0.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530CSM $9,041VYM $849

Year by year

YearCSMVYMOverpaying
10$812$73$739
20$3,128$288$2,840
30$9,041$849$8,192

Expense ratio

  • 0.45%CSM
  • 0.04%VYM, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.29%

VYM cheapest of 99 funds

CSM 71st cheapest of 99 funds

CSM vs VYM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CSM 1.06%
VYM 2.24%, better
Payout (12M)
CSM $0.91
VYM $3.68
Last payment
CSM $0.21
VYM $0.89
Ex-dividend
CSM Sep 23, 2026
VYM Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
CSM Sep 29, 2026
VYM Sep 22, 2026
Frequency
CSM Quarterly
VYM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

CSMQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll CSM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.09; Jun 21, 2017 $0.09; Sep 27, 2017 $0.13; Dec 26, 2017 $0.11; Mar 21, 2018 $0.08; Jun 20, 2018 $0.11; Sep 26, 2018 $0.12; Dec 26, 2018 $0.15; Mar 20, 2019 $0.10; Jun 25, 2019 $0.15; Sep 25, 2019 $0.13; Dec 24, 2019 $0.16; Mar 25, 2020 $0.14; Jun 24, 2020 $0.12; Sep 23, 2020 $0.11; Dec 23, 2020 $0.14; Mar 23, 2021 $0.11; Jun 22, 2021 $0.10; Sep 22, 2021 $0.09; Dec 23, 2021 $0.14; Mar 23, 2022 $0.13; Jun 22, 2022 $0.14; Sep 21, 2022 $0.14; Dec 22, 2022 $0.20; Mar 22, 2023 $0.14; Jun 21, 2023 $0.15; Sep 20, 2023 $0.14; Dec 20, 2023 $0.21; Mar 20, 2024 $0.15; Jun 26, 2024 $0.17; Sep 25, 2024 $0.16; Dec 23, 2024 $0.22; Mar 26, 2025 $0.17; Jun 25, 2025 $0.20; Sep 24, 2025 $0.20; Dec 24, 2025 $0.26; Mar 25, 2026 $0.21; Jun 24, 2026 $0.23; Sep 23, 2026 $0.21. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
VYMQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VYM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.56; Jun 23, 2017 $0.60; Sep 20, 2017 $0.60; Dec 21, 2017 $0.64; Mar 26, 2018 $0.61; Jun 22, 2018 $0.63; Sep 26, 2018 $0.67; Dec 24, 2018 $0.74; Mar 25, 2019 $0.65; Jun 17, 2019 $0.62; Sep 24, 2019 $0.79; Dec 23, 2019 $0.78; Mar 10, 2020 $0.55; Jun 22, 2020 $0.84; Sep 21, 2020 $0.71; Dec 21, 2020 $0.81; Mar 22, 2021 $0.66; Jun 21, 2021 $0.75; Sep 20, 2021 $0.75; Dec 20, 2021 $0.94; Mar 21, 2022 $0.66; Jun 21, 2022 $0.85; Sep 19, 2022 $0.77; Dec 19, 2022 $0.97; Mar 20, 2023 $0.72; Jun 20, 2023 $0.88; Sep 18, 2023 $0.78; Dec 18, 2023 $1.10; Mar 15, 2024 $0.66; Jun 21, 2024 $1.02; Sep 20, 2024 $0.85; Dec 20, 2024 $0.96; Mar 21, 2025 $0.85; Jun 20, 2025 $0.86; Sep 19, 2025 $0.84; Dec 19, 2025 $0.95; Mar 20, 2026 $0.86; Jun 18, 2026 $0.98; Sep 18, 2026 $0.89. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

CSM vs VYM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • CSM
  • VYM
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: CSM −23.8% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CSM 12.6%VYM 11.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CSM 1.38VYM 1.38Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CSM −23.8%VYM −15.9%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CSM 0.97VYM 0.75

CSM and VYM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CSMCvsVONVA

    ProShares Large Cap Core Plus · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsVONVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CSMCvsILCVA

    ProShares Large Cap Core Plus · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsILCVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CSMCvsIMCVA

    ProShares Large Cap Core Plus · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsIMCVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.