Skip to content

CSM vs VONV

ProShares Large Cap Core Plus

CSMCCboe

Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

VONVANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

VONV −0.39pt a year

CSM0.45%VONV0.06%

Avg volume · 30D

VONV 158.9×the volume

CSM4.87KVONV774K

10Y return · a year

CSM +2.2pt

CSM+14.2%VONV+12.0%

CSM vs VONV Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+72.0%CSM+73.8%VONV

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. CSM +72.0%. VONV +73.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CSM 0.45%
VONV 0.06%, better
Fund size
CSM $513M
VONV $23.3B
1Y total return
CSM +11.3%
VONV +28.5%, better
Yield (12M)
CSM 1.06%
VONV 1.53%, better
Holdings
CSM 303
VONV 873
Avg volume (30D)
CSM 4.87K sh
VONV 774K sh, better
NAV per share
CSM $86.42
VONV $113.44
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CSM: Cost 28, Risk 52, Mission 97, Tradability 45, Holdings 44, Durability 69. VONV: Cost 96, Risk 86, Mission 100, Tradability 60, Holdings 49, Durability 93.
Pillar letters and Scores for CSM, VONV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCSMVONV
Cost30% weightD28A96Higher
Mission25% weightA97A100Higher
Risk15% weightC52A86Higher
Tradability15% weightC45B60Higher
Holdings10% weightC44C49Higher
Durability5% weightB69A93Higher

Rank among US Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CSM and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Multifactor⁠

Category · 99 funds
See all 99 ›

VONV ranks 1st and CSM 50th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AVONVVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AILCViShares Morningstar Value ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 48BFYXFirst Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX FundScore 56
  4. Rank 50CCSMProShares Large Cap Core PlusScore 55
  5. Rank 50BPSCPrincipal U.S. Small-Cap Multi-Factor ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CSMCProShares Large Cap Core Plus

VONVAVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

In short

CSM A survivor of the 2009 130/30 craze. CSM runs 130% long a four-factor screen of big U.S. companies and 30% short, so net exposure lands near the market while the factor tilts get turned up.

VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.

Stated mandate

CSM The Fund seeks pre-expense investment results that track the UBS 130/30 Index. It uses equity securities and derivatives to maintain exposure to a rules-based, multi-factor portfolio of leading large-cap U.S. companies with 130% long and 30% short exposure.

VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.

Why people hold it

  • CSM The shorting is the whole point: 130% long, 30% short. Net exposure sits near 100% of the market, but the factor bets carry more weight than a long-only screen allows.
  • Four factors in one rulebook (value, growth, momentum, profitability) spread across roughly 300 large U.S. companies, so no single style is steering the whole portfolio.proshares.com
  • Long-short mechanics inside an ordinary 1940 Act ETF: no lockups, no accreditation, no K-1. It tracks a published benchmark, the UBS 130/30 Index, rather than a manager's hunches.
  • Trading since 2009, which is a long run for a long-short strategy. Most of the 130/30 wave that launched alongside it did not last. Distributions come quarterly.
  • VONV 0.06% a year, a fraction of the typical fee among factor ETFs. On a rules-based value index there is little room for cleverness, so cost does most of the work.vanguard.com
  • Full replication, not sampling: it owns the index's roughly 900 names and has stayed tightly aligned with the Russell 1000 Value benchmark since launching in 2010.
  • Same Russell benchmark as pricier rivals for less: the Goldman MarketBeta version (GVUS) charges 0.12% to track the identical value index.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, among the easiest in its group to get in and out of, and it distributes quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • CSM 0.45% a year is toward the high end for large-cap multifactor. Plain-vanilla peers like VONV (0.06%) and IUSG (0.04%) cost a fraction, though neither shorts anything.
  • One of the lighter-traded funds in its category, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the volume leaders in large-cap factor land.
  • The short sleeve cuts both ways: it adds borrow and derivative costs, and it drags when the market's lowest-ranked names are the ones running.
  • VONV One screen, one style. Value only, with no quality or momentum overlay, so the ride follows the value side of the market wherever it goes.vanguard.com
  • This is the entire value bucket, not a best-ideas portfolio. About 900 holdings means results hug the large-cap value category rather than stray from it.
  • Cheaper exists nearby: Vanguard's VYM charges 0.04%, but it screens for dividend yield, a different portfolio than a Russell value index.

Full CSM profile⁠

Full VONV profile⁠

CSM vs VONV Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CSM vs VONV Cost

Overpaying CSM vs VONV

$7,771

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CSM 0.45%

    $9,041

  • VONV 0.06%

    $1,270

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CSM 0.45%
  • VONV 0.06%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530CSM $9,041VONV $1,270

Year by year

YearCSMVONVOverpaying
10$812$110$702
20$3,128$432$2,696
30$9,041$1,270$7,771

Expense ratio

  • 0.45%CSM
  • 0.06%VONV, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.29%

VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds

CSM 71st cheapest of 99 funds

CSM vs VONV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CSM 1.06%
VONV 1.53%, better
Payout (12M)
CSM $0.91
VONV $1.74
Last payment
CSM $0.21
VONV $0.42
Ex-dividend
CSM Sep 23, 2026
VONV Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
CSM Sep 29, 2026
VONV Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
CSM Quarterly
VONV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

CSMQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll CSM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.09; Jun 21, 2017 $0.09; Sep 27, 2017 $0.13; Dec 26, 2017 $0.11; Mar 21, 2018 $0.08; Jun 20, 2018 $0.11; Sep 26, 2018 $0.12; Dec 26, 2018 $0.15; Mar 20, 2019 $0.10; Jun 25, 2019 $0.15; Sep 25, 2019 $0.13; Dec 24, 2019 $0.16; Mar 25, 2020 $0.14; Jun 24, 2020 $0.12; Sep 23, 2020 $0.11; Dec 23, 2020 $0.14; Mar 23, 2021 $0.11; Jun 22, 2021 $0.10; Sep 22, 2021 $0.09; Dec 23, 2021 $0.14; Mar 23, 2022 $0.13; Jun 22, 2022 $0.14; Sep 21, 2022 $0.14; Dec 22, 2022 $0.20; Mar 22, 2023 $0.14; Jun 21, 2023 $0.15; Sep 20, 2023 $0.14; Dec 20, 2023 $0.21; Mar 20, 2024 $0.15; Jun 26, 2024 $0.17; Sep 25, 2024 $0.16; Dec 23, 2024 $0.22; Mar 26, 2025 $0.17; Jun 25, 2025 $0.20; Sep 24, 2025 $0.20; Dec 24, 2025 $0.26; Mar 25, 2026 $0.21; Jun 24, 2026 $0.23; Sep 23, 2026 $0.21. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
VONVQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VONV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.21; Jun 28, 2017 $0.29; Sep 27, 2017 $0.34; Dec 14, 2017 $0.34; Mar 22, 2018 $0.24; Jun 28, 2018 $0.32; Sep 26, 2018 $0.33; Dec 13, 2018 $0.35; Mar 25, 2019 $0.29; Jun 21, 2019 $0.32; Sep 26, 2019 $0.38; Dec 16, 2019 $0.39; Mar 26, 2020 $0.36; Jun 25, 2020 $0.32; Sep 11, 2020 $0.28; Dec 17, 2020 $0.39; Mar 26, 2021 $0.26; Jun 29, 2021 $0.27; Sep 29, 2021 $0.33; Dec 16, 2021 $0.37; Mar 24, 2022 $0.30; Jun 29, 2022 $0.37; Sep 28, 2022 $0.38; Dec 15, 2022 $0.42; Mar 23, 2023 $0.32; Jun 23, 2023 $0.35; Sep 21, 2023 $0.39; Dec 19, 2023 $0.46; Mar 21, 2024 $0.33; Jun 27, 2024 $0.39; Sep 26, 2024 $0.44; Dec 23, 2024 $0.44; Mar 25, 2025 $0.38; Jun 20, 2025 $0.40; Sep 24, 2025 $0.40; Dec 22, 2025 $0.49; Mar 24, 2026 $0.41; Jun 18, 2026 $0.41; Sep 23, 2026 $0.42. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

CSM vs VONV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • CSM
  • VONV
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: CSM −23.8% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CSM 12.6%VONV 12.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CSM 1.38VONV 1.43, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CSM −23.8%VONV −18.9%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CSM 0.97VONV 0.85

CSM and VONV in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CSMCvsILCVA

    ProShares Large Cap Core Plus · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsILCVA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CSMCvsVYMA

    ProShares Large Cap Core Plus · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsVYMA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CSMCvsIMCVA

    ProShares Large Cap Core Plus · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsIMCVA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.