Skip to content

CSRE vs TMED

Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF

CSRECNYSE Arca

T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

TMEDANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

TMED −0.26pt a year

CSRE0.70%TMED0.44%

Avg volume · 30D

CSRE 24.5×the volume

CSRE182KTMED7.43K

CSRE vs TMED Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+13.3%CSRE+19.9%TMED

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. CSRE +13.3%. TMED +19.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%25%30%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CSRE 0.70%
TMED 0.44%, better
Fund size
CSRE $670M
TMED $34M
1Y total return
CSRE +13.3%
TMED +19.9%, better
Yield (12M)
CSRE 2.03%
TMED No data
Holdings
CSRE 46
TMED 112
Avg volume (30D)
CSRE 182K sh, better
TMED 7.43K sh
NAV per share
CSRE $28.07
TMED $34.31
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CSRE: Cost 32, Risk 67, Mission 83, Tradability 59, Holdings 54, Durability 41. TMED: Cost 82, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings 91, Durability 35.
Pillar letters and Scores for CSRE, TMED, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCSRETMED
Cost30% weightD32A82Higher
Mission25% weightA83Not scored
Risk15% weightB67HigherB55
Tradability15% weightB59B59
Holdings10% weightC54A91Higher
Durability5% weightC41HigherD35

Rank among US Active Sector funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CSRE and TMED are both graded against the same 35 US Active Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Sector⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

TMED ranks 2nd and CSRE 17th of 35 funds in the US Active Sector Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVREAvantis Real Estate ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2APSRInvesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 2ATMEDT. Rowe Price Health Care ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4BTRUTVanEck Technology TruSector ETFScore 69
  5. Rank 15CJTEKJPMorgan U.S. Tech Leaders ETFScore 50
  6. Rank 17CCSRECohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETFScore 48
  7. Rank 18CGTOPGoldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETFScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CSRECCohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF

TMEDAT. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

In short

CSRE Active real estate, run by a house that specializes in it. Cohen & Steers holds a tight book of listed property names picked bottom-up on relative value, not by index weight. Launched in 2025.

TMED No data

Stated mandate

CSRE The Fund seeks total return through publicly traded real estate securities. It is actively managed using a bottom-up, relative-value process to select investments.

TMED No data

Why people hold it

  • CSRE Genuinely active, not an index in disguise: a bottom-up, relative-value process using a proprietary valuation model to pick listed real estate securities.
  • Roughly 40 holdings, so a single conviction call carries real weight instead of being diluted across hundreds of names.
  • The portfolio lines up closely with what the prospectus promises: real estate equity, actively selected, no drift into whatever sector is hot.
  • Trades tightly for a fund this young, and distributions come on a quarterly schedule.

TMED No data

Worth knowing

  • CSRE 0.70% a year is above the typical active equity ETF, and a large multiple of low-cost core options like DFAU and DFAC. Active selection has to earn that gap.
  • Launched in 2025, so the live record is short and risk measures rest on thin history.
  • One sector, concentrated: property cycles and interest rates drive the ride here, on a very different path from a broad equity fund.

TMED No data

Full CSRE profile⁠

Full TMED profile⁠

CSRE vs TMED Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CSRE vs TMED Cost

Overpaying CSRE vs TMED

$4,754

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CSRE 0.70%

    $13,606

  • TMED 0.44%

    $8,852

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CSRE 0.70%
  • TMED 0.44%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530CSRE $13,606TMED $8,852

Year by year

YearCSRETMEDOverpaying
10$1,250$794$456
20$4,760$3,061$1,699
30$13,606$8,852$4,754

Expense ratio

  • 0.70%CSRE
  • 0.44%TMED, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Sector funds
  • Median 0.61%

TMED 7th cheapest of 35 funds

CSRE 24th cheapest of 35 funds

CSRE vs TMED Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
CSRE 2.03%
TMED No data
Payout (12M)
CSRE $0.58
TMED No data
Last payment
CSRE $0.13
TMED $0.16
Ex-dividend
CSRE Sep 29, 2026
TMED Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
CSRE Sep 30, 2026
TMED Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
CSRE Quarterly
TMED Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

CSREQuarterly · 7 paymentsAll CSRE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Mar 28, 2025 $0.16; Jun 27, 2025 $0.15; Sep 29, 2025 $0.18; Dec 15, 2025 $0.20; Mar 30, 2026 $0.11; Jun 29, 2026 $0.13; Sep 29, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD
TMEDIrregular · 1 paymentAll TMED payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD

CSRE vs TMED Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CSRE 13.7%since Mar 2025TMED 14.7%since Jul 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CSRE 0.29since Mar 2025TMED 1.50since Jul 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CSRE −13.0%since Feb 2025TMED −11.1%since Jun 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CSRE 0.51TMED 0.46

CSRE and TMED in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CSRECvsAVREA

    Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMEDAvsAVREA

    T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CSRECvsPSRA

    Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMEDAvsPSRA

    T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CSRECvsTRUTB

    Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF · VanEck Technology TruSector ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMEDAvsTRUTB

    T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF · VanEck Technology TruSector ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.